Trump_is_Mentally_fit Posted Wednesday at 04:29 PM Posted Wednesday at 04:29 PM Hegseth=WhiskeyLeaks 2
Doc Posted Wednesday at 04:39 PM Posted Wednesday at 04:39 PM 2 hours ago, BillsFanNC said: 🎯 Trump at minimum admitted a mistake was made in a situation that by contrast doesn't hold a friggin candle to a decision that led to 13 Marines losing their life. Someone should have been accidentally looped-into that disastrous failure... 2 hours ago, B-Man said: Has the Staffer Who Put Jeffrey Goldberg on the Signal Chat Been Exposed? by Matt Margolis Democrats were in faux outrage mode in the wake of a report by Jeffrey Goldberg of The Atlantic that he was mistakenly included in a chat on Signal with senior Trump administration officials discussing a planned military strike on Houthi rebels in Yemen. Goldberg described the chat as containing “classified” information; however, that is untrue. So while this wasn’t the scandal that Democrats hoped it would be, the big question that remains is how Goldberg ended up in the chat on Signal in the first place. According to President Trump, they know that it was a staffer of National Security Advisor Mike Waltz. https://pjmedia.com/matt-margolis/2025/03/25/has-the-staffer-who-put-jeffrey-goldberg-on-the-signal-chat-been-exposed-n4938269 I'm wondering if this wasn't done intentionally. That person needs to be fired at a minimum. 1
BillsFanNC Posted Wednesday at 04:57 PM Posted Wednesday at 04:57 PM Boom. So, let’s me get this straight. The Atlantic released the so-called “war plans” and those “plans” include: No names. No targets. No locations. No units. No routes. No sources. No methods. And no classified information. Those are some really ***** war plans. This only proves one thing: Jeff Goldberg has never seen a war plan or an “attack plan” (as he now calls it). Not even close. As I type this, my team and I are traveling the INDOPACOM region, meeting w/ Commanders (the guys who make REAL “war plans”) and talking to troops. We will continue to do our job, while the media does what it does best: peddle hoaxes. 1
The Frankish Reich Posted Wednesday at 05:03 PM Posted Wednesday at 05:03 PM 6 minutes ago, BillsFanNC said: Boom. So, let’s me get this straight. The Atlantic released the so-called “war plans” and those “plans” include: No names. No targets. No locations. No units. No routes. No sources. No methods. And no classified information. Those are some really ***** war plans. This only proves one thing: Jeff Goldberg has never seen a war plan or an “attack plan” (as he now calls it). Not even close. As I type this, my team and I are traveling the INDOPACOM region, meeting w/ Commanders (the guys who make REAL “war plans”) and talking to troops. We will continue to do our job, while the media does what it does best: peddle hoaxes. I'm sure that CIA Intel officer will be thrilled! 5 minutes ago, B-Man said: It will "work" in that it exposes the clownish lack of experience and judgement of Trump 2.0's version of the "best people." This didn't happen with Mattis, Kelly, McMaster, etc. Remember "my generals?" Now we have "my Fox weekend commenters." 2
Roundybout Posted Wednesday at 05:32 PM Posted Wednesday at 05:32 PM Another goddamn unqualified moron gets caught being a goddamn unqualified moron 2 1 1
Big Blitz Posted Wednesday at 05:33 PM Posted Wednesday at 05:33 PM (edited) 32 minutes ago, The Frankish Reich said: I'm sure that CIA Intel officer will be thrilled! It will "work" in that it exposes the clownish lack of experience and judgement of Trump 2.0's version of the "best people." This didn't happen with Mattis, Kelly, McMaster, etc. Remember "my generals?" Now we have "my Fox weekend commenters." Those clowns all led military failures. Those clowns led the Afghanistan withdrawal and the surrender of Iraq. If this administration’s biggest mistake is somehow allowing a journalist who has the defense team on speed dial into a non classified group chat, awesome. Allegedly. Not a foreign actor. Not a threat to the country. They weren’t hacked. They did nothing nefarious. They followed protocol. They just so happened to “invite” an anti Trump “journalist” into a chat. Suuuuure. And he stuck around - so much integrity. 1 of 2 things happened. This wasn’t them this was absolutely setup by someone to get Goldberg in there - they know it that’s why Waltz still has a job. That or, they wanted the discussion leaked and deliberately let the guy they knew would do so into the chat. And you see a defense team in complete command and control operate a successful strike on the enemy. If that’s the “dumbest” thing we do while kicking the correct **s around the world sign me up. Edited Wednesday at 05:36 PM by Big Blitz
BillsFanNC Posted Wednesday at 05:39 PM Posted Wednesday at 05:39 PM That "CIA asset" was Ratcliffe's friggin chief of staff. Deep undercover and now exposed!
Big Blitz Posted Wednesday at 05:42 PM Posted Wednesday at 05:42 PM Just now, BillsFanNC said: That "CIA asset" was Ratcliffe's friggin chief of staff. Deep undercover and now exposed! The 24 - 48 hour rule. It doesn’t just apply to Trump. It’s with anything Democrats and their media sycophants drop. CIA DIRECTOR RATCLIFFE: "Yesterday I spent 4 HOURS answering questions from senators as a result of that article intimating that I transmitted classified information. Those messages were revealed today - I did NOT transmit classified information." "The reporter, who I don't know, intentionally intended it to indicate that. That reporter also indicated I released the name of an undercover CIA operative... in fact, I released the name of my CHIEF OF STAFF, who is not operating undercover. That was deliberately false and MISLEADING." "The mission was a remarkable success - because that's what did happen, not what COULD have happened." 1 1
BillsFanNC Posted Wednesday at 05:43 PM Posted Wednesday at 05:43 PM A glowing review of treason from guess who? Jeffrey Goldberg. Reliable indeed. 1 1
Roundybout Posted Wednesday at 05:45 PM Posted Wednesday at 05:45 PM 3 minutes ago, Big Blitz said: The 24 - 48 hour rule. It doesn’t just apply to Trump. It’s with anything Democrats and their media sycophants drop. CIA DIRECTOR RATCLIFFE: "Yesterday I spent 4 HOURS answering questions from senators as a result of that article intimating that I transmitted classified information. Those messages were revealed today - I did NOT transmit classified information." "The reporter, who I don't know, intentionally intended it to indicate that. That reporter also indicated I released the name of an undercover CIA operative... in fact, I released the name of my CHIEF OF STAFF, who is not operating undercover. That was deliberately false and MISLEADING." "The mission was a remarkable success - because that's what did happen, not what COULD have happened." You are such an unbelievable **** for this administration that it’s shocking.
Big Blitz Posted Wednesday at 05:55 PM Posted Wednesday at 05:55 PM (edited) 11 minutes ago, Roundybout said: You are such an unbelievable **** for this administration that it’s shocking. You're arguing with someone who gave little attention or care to the Hillary emails, Hunter Biden laptop, and Joe Biden classified docs story. Barely any care. I do not see the same being true with those scandals on the left that are breathlessly hoping to turn this absolutely nothing burger into something it isn’t. If you wanted this to be something, Comey should have said Hillary’s use of a private server was indeed a problem or crime. Instead, we might now actually know why she used a private server. Edited Wednesday at 05:57 PM by Big Blitz
Motorin' Posted Wednesday at 06:09 PM Posted Wednesday at 06:09 PM 28 minutes ago, Big Blitz said: Those clowns all led military failures. Those clowns led the Afghanistan withdrawal and the surrender of Iraq. If this administration’s biggest mistake is somehow allowing a journalist who has the defense team on speed dial into a non classified group chat, awesome. Allegedly. Not a foreign actor. Not a threat to the country. They weren’t hacked. They did nothing nefarious. They followed protocol. They just so happened to “invite” an anti Trump “journalist” into a chat. Suuuuure. And he stuck around - so much integrity. 1 of 2 things happened. This wasn’t them this was absolutely setup by someone to get Goldberg in there - they know it that’s why Waltz still has a job. That or, they wanted the discussion leaked and deliberately let the guy they knew would do so into the chat. And you see a defense team in complete command and control operate a successful strike on the enemy. If that’s the “dumbest” thing we do while kicking the correct **s around the world sign me up. I mean, if they had fomented a revolution and sent an American Ambassador to an unguarded outpost to be murdered. That would be understandable. If they had outsourced the exit plan security to the Taliban and got 13 American soldiers killed, that would be forgivable... But adding an American journalist to an encrypted text group and divulging general points about an imminent attack that ended up being highly successful? Unforgivable. The worst blunder in American history. The editor of the Atlantic could have been a trans-ethnic agent mole for the Houthi rebels, which could have conceivably alerted his countryman to watch out for F18's somewhere in the vicinity of Yemen. Thank God no American was killed by Houthi rebels in the middle of the night, the Democrats would have to give Mike Waltz a medal. 3
stevestojan Posted Wednesday at 06:10 PM Posted Wednesday at 06:10 PM (edited) 2 hours ago, BillsFanNC said: He's been here a long time.... early 2000's era. So was I, and he somehow thinks it's "weird" that a GenXer remembers this: Circa 2003ish pornboy, and bullstojan is a loooonnnnnggg way from a porn star, fluffer maybe. Anyway, during those days he spent his entire workday on here stealing from his employer (porn industry related) while spamming the main board with mundane, uninteresting tales from his life. He became such a clown around here that the powers that be changed the curse filter for shlit = stevestojan. So if you typed shlit (minus the l) it came out as stevestojan in your post. Imagine what a clown act you'd have to be to get the mods to do that? Also it's super weird that I and every single other poster who was here during that time would remember it, right? Anyway, thats why his appropriate moniker is bullstojan. He also likes to use references that were never funny in the first place as if they continue to be funny the 50th time. I'm guessing he must have been staring into some wood paneling in his youth while getting pegged in the ass. To correct this, in college to pay for Ramen, I worked for a collection company that followed up on losers who sat in dank, wood panel lined dens who spent too much time with what was an early version of onlyfans. We had one user, maybe BillsFanSC (something close to that, but it was eons ago so I might be off a bit) who was our top spender. He was pathetic, like all the rest, but he had a particularly weird fetish, so it sticks in my memory. Dude posts endless Twitter posts, then replies to himself 45 times in the same thread (while his two lapdogs give him that sweet sweet thumbs up) but finds my over-posting from 25 years ago to be “too much.” The difference for me was I turned 22, graduated college, and didn’t need to LAMP all day, every day, like our wood panel fanatic boomer still does. Oh, this is too fun. Edited Wednesday at 06:13 PM by stevestojan
sherpa Posted Wednesday at 06:12 PM Posted Wednesday at 06:12 PM 1 hour ago, The Frankish Reich said: It will "work" in that it exposes the clownish lack of experience and judgement of Trump 2.0's version of the "best people." This didn't happen with Mattis, Kelly, McMaster, etc. Remember "my generals?" Now we have "my Fox weekend commenters." I have a completely different view on this. The issue is a major screw up. No doubt about it. Admit it. Fix it. But, the strike was successful and the mistake had no consequence. On the other hand, the strategic policy of defending against drones and missiles at massive cost, instead of launching an offensive strike to eliminate the threat, to the point of the US military being concerned about inventory, was an idiotic policy, as expressed by the on scene commander. 1
ScotSHO Posted Wednesday at 06:13 PM Posted Wednesday at 06:13 PM 1 minute ago, Motorin' said: I mean, if they had fomented a revolution and sent an American Ambassador to an unguarded outpost to be murdered. That would be understandable. If they had outsourced the exit plan security to the Taliban and got 13 American soldiers killed, that would be forgivable... But adding an American journalist to an encrypted text group and divulging general points about an imminent attack that ended up being highly successful? Unforgivable. The worst blunder in American history. The editor of the Atlantic could have been a trans-ethnic agent mole for the Houthi rebels, which could have conceivably alerted his countryman to watch out for F18's somewhere in the vicinity of Yemen. Thank God no American was killed by Houthi rebels in the middle of the night, the Democrats would have to give Mike Waltz a medal. ROundy, Al Frankish and the remainder of the smarter humans don't care about results, they care about FEELINGS. How many time do we have to remind you. Their brains are just bigger & better than ours.
Roundybout Posted Wednesday at 06:24 PM Posted Wednesday at 06:24 PM 9 minutes ago, ScotSHO said: ROundy, Al Frankish and the remainder of the smarter humans don't care about results, they care about FEELINGS. How many time do we have to remind you. Their brains are just bigger & better than ours. I love how you think a gigantic national security breach is just “feelings.”
Motorin' Posted Wednesday at 06:26 PM Posted Wednesday at 06:26 PM 15 minutes ago, stevestojan said: To correct this, in college to pay for Ramen, I worked for a collection company that followed up on losers who sat in dank, wood panel lined dens who spent too much time with what was an early version of onlyfans. We had one user, maybe BillsFanSC (something close to that, but it was eons ago so I might be off a bit) who was our top spender. He was pathetic, like all the rest, but he had a particularly weird fetish, so it sticks in my memory. Dude posts endless Twitter posts, then replies to himself 45 times in the same thread (while his two lapdogs give him that sweet sweet thumbs up) but finds my over-posting from 25 years ago to be “too much.” The difference for me was I turned 22, graduated college, and didn’t need to LAMP all day, every day, like our wood panel fanatic boomer still does. Oh, this is too fun. Did they really make your username replace the word sh!t whenever it was posted?
Trump_is_Mentally_fit Posted Wednesday at 06:27 PM Posted Wednesday at 06:27 PM 13 minutes ago, sherpa said: I have a completely different view on this. The issue is a major screw up. No doubt about it. Admit it. Fix it. Fire the drunk that made the mistake? Or let him alone to do some other total screw up?
Recommended Posts