Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
Just now, Big Blitz said:


 

If it’s great for you it’s great for all us!

 

MAGA!!!  
 

We told you!  Welcome aboard!  We love to laugh to.  

uh huh.  it's a nursery school rhyme for you morons.  that's the iq the propagandists are targeting.  they know their audience.

  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted
1 minute ago, Big Blitz said:


 

If it’s great for you it’s great for all us!

 

MAGA!!!  
 

We told you!  Welcome aboard!  We love to laugh to.  

Clowns.  Amateur hour in the white house. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted

And no Jeff, they weren’t irresponsible with material!  Why didn’t you just exit the chat?  Show us why this was so detrimental to national security.  Show the intel.  He can’t.  
 

The farthest thing from an enemy of America that would put troops in harms way was in this chat.  And you stayed because???  
 

Was that what you were told to?  
 

The administration was being nefarious?  Sold out to Putin in a group chat?  Sold out America?   Nope.  Exact opposite.  

 

 

 

  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted
23 minutes ago, sherpa said:

 

The information was not leaked to the Houthis, at least not by any credible report, so it had no impact.

The strike was extremely successful.

It was a clear screw up, but conjecture without evidence, ie., any real harm, is being used for political purposes.

I give them one major screw up.

 

But....The major screw up was not getting offensive re the Houthis in the first place, and that was entirely on Biden Inc.

Requested by the fleet commander and refused, so we defended $300 drones with $1 million missiles, to the point of drawing down those weapons to dangerous levels.

Eventually, an F-18 was shot down by our own forces, and it was damn near miraculous that a second one, in close trail, was not.

 

How do you know that?  Who is the senior R who said that the Chinese/Russians had the info in advance?  How do we know they didn’t tip them?   And how do we know it can’t be used against us in the future?  Loose lips sink ships. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted

They were so outraged about Hillary's emails, yet ironically chose to communicate through Signal—an app notorious for its popularity among adulterers and drug dealers.

 

 

 

 

Posted
32 minutes ago, JDHillFan said:

Search results for “scum”

 

the good doctor 58

Sherpa 0


 

Search results for “Nazi”

 

the good doctor 194

Sherpa 27 - not one of which was used in a name-calling manner. 
 

Please don’t disrespect this gentleman that served his country proudly by comparing him to an over-emotional loon. 

 

Well, he doesn't call me names, so I guess I haven't kept tally.

 

Anyway, you actually can be a value-added poster, when you choose to be ... resist the temptation to join the Zero Marginal Value crowd!

Posted
14 minutes ago, Big Blitz said:

And no Jeff, they weren’t irresponsible with material!  Why didn’t you just exit the chat?  Show us why this was so detrimental to national security.  Show the intel.  He can’t.  
 

The farthest thing from an enemy of America that would put troops in harms way was in this chat.  And you stayed because???  
 

Was that what you were told to?  
 

The administration was being nefarious?  Sold out to Putin in a group chat?  Sold out America?   Nope.  Exact opposite.  

 

 

 

i think he's trying to be an actual ethical journalist.  I know how counterintuitive that is to propaganda reading maga's.

2 minutes ago, The Frankish Reich said:

Well, he doesn't call me names, so I guess I haven't kept tally.

 

Anyway, you actually can be a value-added poster, when you choose to be ... resist the temptation to join the Zero Marginal Value crowd!

if you had nazi or scummy tendencies, I'd definitely let you know.  You don't.

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Agree 1
Posted
4 minutes ago, Joe Ferguson forever said:

i think he's trying to be an actual ethical journalist.  I know how counterintuitive that is to propaganda reading maga's.

 


 

Suckers and Losers.  

Posted
39 minutes ago, Big Blitz said:


 

So if I’m not playing conspiracy theorist - based on what I know of the app - Waltz very well mistakingly added him thinking he was someone else. 
 

While, bad, it’s an American war hawk journalist.  My belief is had this been any other administration he says nothing about this.  That reporters learn things before hand all the time.  And say nothing. 
 

It’s Trump.  So he’ll be glad to. 
 

His b.s. trying to play the high road “unlike this administration I care about our national security interests or secrets” or whatever the hell he said.  
 

He’s lying. 

 

Okay, but let's take this a bit further. 

 

Why is some random reporter from The Atlantic finding out about a special military operation before CONGRESS does? 

Posted (edited)
2 minutes ago, Big Blitz said:


 

Suckers and Losers.  

are we talking personal scorecards or political teams?  cuz I'd say we're winning personally and near the end of the first quarter as a team....

Edited by Joe Ferguson forever
Posted
10 minutes ago, Big Blitz said:


 

No lies detected 

 


Reinforced in the texts.  

 

"Hey I found that guy who has been aggressively flirting with my wife having sex with her! I'm so glad he's consistent with his messaging!"

Posted
6 minutes ago, The Frankish Reich said:

Well, he doesn't call me names, so I guess I haven't kept tally.

 

Anyway, you actually can be a value-added poster, when you choose to be ... resist the temptation to join the Zero Marginal Value crowd!

The posters that you have drawn a parallel between - one has a manner that is measured. The other calls people he disagrees with nazis and scum. It doesn’t take a tally of anything to know that. Just have to pay the slightest bit of attention. 
 

Also - thank you for recognizing my potential. It’s all I’ve ever wanted. 

Posted
4 minutes ago, Roundybout said:

 

Okay, but let's take this a bit further. 

 

Why is some random reporter from The Atlantic finding out about a special military operation before CONGRESS does? 


 


Ok then.  

  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted
1 minute ago, The Frankish Reich said:

goes to show, you don't need to be intelligent to be a special forces soldier, a congressman or a cabinet secretary.  maybe he got knocked in the head a few times too many.

×
×
  • Create New...