Ghost of BiB Posted June 30, 2005 Share Posted June 30, 2005 I'm sure someone will say "Rommel...I've heard of him!" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chilly Posted June 30, 2005 Share Posted June 30, 2005 Penis Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VABills Posted June 30, 2005 Share Posted June 30, 2005 Sun Tzu. Any real warrior knows that. Those two are amateurs in comparison. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tux of Borg Posted June 30, 2005 Share Posted June 30, 2005 Wasn't it General Tso, who fought and slaughtered Muslims during the 19th century rebellion in China. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VABills Posted June 30, 2005 Share Posted June 30, 2005 Wasn't it General Tso, who fought and slaughtered Muslims during the 19th century rebellion in China. 371456[/snapback] No that's the stuff I order at Tony Changs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ghost of BiB Posted June 30, 2005 Author Share Posted June 30, 2005 No that's the stuff I order at Tony Changs. 371457[/snapback] Keep with the program I know it's complicated, but the auto-answer is not Chesty Puller. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ghost of BiB Posted June 30, 2005 Author Share Posted June 30, 2005 Wasn't it General Tso, who fought and slaughtered Muslims during the 19th century rebellion in China. 371456[/snapback] No, he made chicken. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EC-Bills Posted June 30, 2005 Share Posted June 30, 2005 Hmm... Since Kirk > Picard.... Gudarian > Rummel... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VABills Posted June 30, 2005 Share Posted June 30, 2005 Keep with the program I know it's complicated, but the auto-answer is not Chesty Puller. 371460[/snapback] Puller was far better then them. In fact SunTzu is his only rival in history. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EC-Bills Posted June 30, 2005 Share Posted June 30, 2005 Puller was far better then them. In fact SunTzu is his only rival in history. 371465[/snapback] I like Sun Tzu! It was always a challenge going against him in The Ancient Art of War computer game Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ghost of BiB Posted June 30, 2005 Author Share Posted June 30, 2005 Hmm... Since Kirk > Picard.... Gudarian > Rummel... 371463[/snapback] You understand, grasshopper. Basic math. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EC-Bills Posted June 30, 2005 Share Posted June 30, 2005 You understand, grasshopper. Basic math. 371467[/snapback] I may be slow but I do eventually catch on Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crap Throwing Monkey Posted June 30, 2005 Share Posted June 30, 2005 Pfff. Tukachevsky's not an option? For that matter, where the hell's Genghis Khan? He introduced all the basic principles long before Guderian or anyone else. Hell, Genghis Khan was coordinating multiple forces along multiple operational axes separated by hundreds of miles in the 13th Century...it took the rest of the world seven hundred years to even approach that standard. I'd like to see Guderian coordinate the encirclement of Kiev with flags and bonfires... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ghost of BiB Posted June 30, 2005 Author Share Posted June 30, 2005 Pfff. Tukachevsky's not an option? For that matter, where the hell's Genghis Khan? He introduced all the basic principles long before Guderian or anyone else. Hell, Genghis Khan was coordinating multiple forces along multiple operational axes separated by hundreds of miles in the 13th Century...it took the rest of the world seven hundred years to even approach that standard. I'd like to see Guderian coordinate the encirclement of Kiev with flags and bonfires... 371486[/snapback] Nice deflection. No argument, so you jump on something totally irrelevant. WHO actually forwarded Armor theory in Germany through the late 20's and early 30's? AND who made it work? Huh. Wasn't Tukachevsky. He was a reactive and learned from Heinz. Guedarian > Rommel Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VABills Posted June 30, 2005 Share Posted June 30, 2005 Pfff. Tukachevsky's not an option? For that matter, where the hell's Genghis Khan? He introduced all the basic principles long before Guderian or anyone else. Hell, Genghis Khan was coordinating multiple forces along multiple operational axes separated by hundreds of miles in the 13th Century...it took the rest of the world seven hundred years to even approach that standard. I'd like to see Guderian coordinate the encirclement of Kiev with flags and bonfires... 371486[/snapback] This was from a guy whose services best Generals were a nutcase who started the Korean War because he didn't follow orders and stop, and the Supreme Commander who later became president even though he finished last in his class at West Point. You expect him to know what a good general is? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ghost of BiB Posted June 30, 2005 Author Share Posted June 30, 2005 Puller was far better then them. In fact SunTzu is his only rival in history. 371465[/snapback] Shut up. We're not talking to you. I forget why. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crap Throwing Monkey Posted June 30, 2005 Share Posted June 30, 2005 Nice deflection. No argument, so you jump on something totally irrelevant. WHO actually forwarded Armor theory in Germany through the late 20's and early 30's? AND who made it work? Huh. Wasn't Tukachevsky. He was a reactive and learned from Heinz. Guedarian > Rommel 371495[/snapback] Tukachevsky was a reactive that learned from Guderian? Uh, sure...that must be why the Soviets were conducting massed armor maneuvers coordinated with CAS and airborne operations at the brigade and division levels while Guderian was playing soldier with mere handfuls of civilian autos in lieu of the yet-to-be-delivered PzKw-I... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crap Throwing Monkey Posted June 30, 2005 Share Posted June 30, 2005 This was from a guy whose services best Generals were a nutcase who started the Korean War because he didn't follow orders and stop, and the Supreme Commander who later became president even though he finished last in his class at West Point. You expect him to know what a good general is? 371497[/snapback] Yeah, shut up. Chesty Puller is second only to Sun Tzu? Who's third on that list, BF? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
/dev/null Posted June 30, 2005 Share Posted June 30, 2005 Patton > * Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ghost of BiB Posted June 30, 2005 Author Share Posted June 30, 2005 Tukachevsky was a reactive that learned from Guderian? Uh, sure...that must be why the Soviets were conducting massed armor maneuvers coordinated with CAS and airborne operations at the brigade and division levels while Guderian was playing soldier with mere handfuls of civilian autos in lieu of the yet-to-be-delivered PzKw-I... 371507[/snapback] You're having a French moment again. BTW, can you decipher Bills last on Korea? This was from a guy whose services best Generals were a nutcase who started the Korean War because he didn't follow orders and stop, and the Supreme Commander who later became president even though he finished last in his class at West Point. You expect him to know what a good general is? I thought he only saw Star Wars once. Did he like it? Or was he always hung on Yoda? (one of those understanding eye to eye things) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts