boyst Posted 23 hours ago Posted 23 hours ago 32 minutes ago, JGMcD2 said: Totally agree, would be an absolute shame for us to treat this human being like a human being. The audacity. not my point. my point is that this should be in addition to him being the best player on the board. it should have absolutely no bearing on decisions if he can play football. there are only two things that matter when we draft a cornerback: 1) can he play the position better than anyone else on the board? 2) did he bring a notebook to the meeting? if either of those are yes, we run to the podium. 2 Quote
MrEpsYtown Posted 23 hours ago Posted 23 hours ago 1 hour ago, boyst said: I don't need a *~~😇😇Feel♥️Good♥️Story😇😇~~*. I need a hard nosed football player. Good for this dude but play ball. Need more content for the Hallmark movie 2 Quote
mannc Posted 23 hours ago Posted 23 hours ago I wonder if interviews of draft-eligible players have any value at all…it seems possible that a team that conducted no interviews and just based their board on tape evaluation might be better off… Quote
boyst Posted 23 hours ago Posted 23 hours ago (edited) 36 minutes ago, MrEpsYtown said: Need more content for the Hallmark movie the scene is a cold winter day in Lackawanna. A young couple stops in to visit a coffee shop and this is where we meet Phil, a recently appointed partner at the NYC brokering house of William and Randolph Duke who coaches the NYC blind basketball league after being a 4 year letterman at Penn. Phil's soon to be wife, Juliette is a writer after having multiple injuries preventing her from dancing after her 2 years at Juliard where she left to go Barnard. They are making plans for a nice getaway to Niagara on the Lake and finally roll into town to stop at family bakery where Kyle has returned home to help his grandparents run without telling her he was failing college at Oswego and has a pending drug charge for pills in his car. He is still a nice guy and won at least two hacky sack battles in college. Still, he is a nice guy with charming good looks. ...long story short Kyle convinces Juliet to take over the cookie business with him and begin her writing there with absolutely no business experience. Phil goes back to NYC and finds a 10/10 who isn't cracked out in fantasy land and lives happily ever after while Juliet deals with Kyle 10 years later, a bankrupt cookie shop, 2 kids, and kyle promising he will leave the casino by 11pm. Edited 23 hours ago by boyst 5 Quote
SoonerBillsFan Posted 23 hours ago Posted 23 hours ago 24 minutes ago, boyst said: the scene is a cold winter day in Lackawanna. A young couple stops in to visit a coffee shop and this is where we meet Phil, a recently appointed partner at the NYC brokering house of William and Randolph Duke who coaches the NYC blind basketball league after being a 4 year letterman at Penn. Phil's soon to be wife, Juliette is a writer after having multiple injuries preventing her from dancing after her 2 years at Juliard where she left to go Barnard. They are making plans for a nice getaway to Niagara on the Lake and finally roll into town to stop at family bakery where Kyle has returned home to help his grandparents run without telling her he was failing college at Oswego and has a pending drug charge for pills in his car. He is still a nice guy and won at least two hacky sack battles in college. Still, he is a nice guy with charming good looks. ...long story short Kyle convinces Juliet to take over the cookie business with him and begin her writing there with absolutely no business experience. Phil goes back to NYC and finds a 10/10 who isn't cracked out in fantasy land and lives happily ever after while Juliet deals with Kyle 10 years later, a bankrupt cookie shop, 2 kids, and Phil promising he will leave the casino by 11pm. I vote to pull your man card. 5 Quote
The Jokeman Posted 19 hours ago Posted 19 hours ago 4 hours ago, mannc said: I wonder if interviews of draft-eligible players have any value at all…it seems possible that a team that conducted no interviews and just based their board on tape evaluation might be better off… Until you draft a QB that can't recall your 9 worded calls to tell the X WR to run a A route, your slot guy run run a C and your TE and Oline to slide protection to the left for a screen to the FB and instead takes a sack because he was waiting for the TE to run a a route. 2 Quote
mannc Posted 19 hours ago Posted 19 hours ago 15 minutes ago, The Jokeman said: Until you draft a QB that can't recall your 9 worded calls to tell the X WR to run a A route, your slot guy run run a C and your TE and Oline to slide protection to the left for a screen to the FB and instead takes a sack because he was waiting for the TE to run a a route. My comment was sort of tongue-in-cheek, but still, I wonder how many teams fall irrationally in love with a college player because of his interview, or vice versa. Professional football just doesn’t seem like job where your “interview” should matter much… 1 2 Quote
The Jokeman Posted 18 hours ago Posted 18 hours ago 6 minutes ago, mannc said: My comment was sort of tongue-in-cheek, but still, I wonder how many teams fall irrationally in love with a college player because of his interview, or vice versa. Professional football just doesn’t seem like job where your “interview” should matter much… Yes/no I mean football as much about talent but also self drive, fitting in with coaches/teammates etc. it's why drafting is no easy task as many variables. If it was black and white somebody would find the formula eventually. Quote
nosejob Posted 17 hours ago Posted 17 hours ago 5 hours ago, boyst said: not my point. my point is that this should be in addition to him being the best player on the board. it should have absolutely no bearing on decisions if he can play football. there are only two things that matter when we draft a cornerback: 1) can he play the position better than anyone else on the board? 2) did he bring a notebook to the meeting? if either of those are yes, we run to the podium. I like to look at INTs in college and a senior as well. Who was that kid we drafted that had a ton as a rookie? That I think we traded to NO? Quote
boyst Posted 15 hours ago Posted 15 hours ago 2 hours ago, nosejob said: I like to look at INTs in college and a senior as well. Who was that kid we drafted that had a ton as a rookie? That I think we traded to NO? Nickel robey, jabari greer 1 Quote
gonzo1105 Posted 15 hours ago Posted 15 hours ago Amos or Revel would be a home run for the Bills and their CB spot in this draft 5 Quote
4merper4mer Posted 14 hours ago Posted 14 hours ago 42 minutes ago, boyst said: Nickel robey, jabari greer 42 minutes ago, boyst said: Nickel robey, jabari greer I think Jairus Byrd. 1 3 Quote
wppete Posted 13 hours ago Posted 13 hours ago 2 hours ago, gonzo1105 said: Amos or Revel would be a home run for the Bills and their CB spot in this draft I really like Revel. Then go DT in the 2nd and 4th round. 1 Quote
LEBills Posted 12 hours ago Posted 12 hours ago 4 hours ago, Warriorspikes51 said: If you look at the DTs that were all pro or pro bowl over the last decade, a vast majority of them either had 5 sacks in a season by their third year in college or ran a sub 5.0 40 at over 295 pounds. CJ West is the only DT in the draft to hit both. He is going to be a stud. 1 2 1 Quote
Richard Noggin Posted 11 hours ago Posted 11 hours ago 10 hours ago, SoonerBillsFan said: I vote to pull your man card. Wha? That writeup was a perfectly realistic adaptation of the standard Hallmark fantasy, with one exception: the favorable glossing of who Phil ends up with back in NYC is unrealistic, as that superficial, transactional partnership is likely destined for rapid uncoupling. Tariff-related market plunges plus a crypto pump-and-dump betrayal conspire to derail Phil's career and portfolio, and the 10/10 didn't sign up for a non-destination wedding or "SEC interviews." 5 hours ago, nosejob said: I like to look at INTs in college and a senior as well. Who was that kid we drafted that had a ton as a rookie? That I think we traded to NO? Byrd. (It's been said already, but Jairus Byrd had an insanely fortuitous INT count as a rookie, and was surprisingly (as I look back) still productive in 4/5 years with Buffalo. He was NOT traded, however. It was that dang foot, wasn't it?) 1 1 1 Quote
Aross3415 Posted 6 hours ago Posted 6 hours ago Has there been many rumors of Buffalo possibly drafting a safety? I feel like we could definitely upgrade that position… im thinking maybe 3-4th round but Buffalo should definitely look at JJ Roberts from Marshall University. He is a great player and leader… At his pro day he tested great and is one of the top safetys in this years draft… Ran a 4.41 and would be a great addition… 1 Quote
nosejob Posted 4 hours ago Posted 4 hours ago 9 hours ago, 4merper4mer said: I think Jairus Byrd. Thank you! Quote
The Jokeman Posted 4 hours ago Posted 4 hours ago 1 hour ago, Aross3415 said: Has there been many rumors of Buffalo possibly drafting a safety? I feel like we could definitely upgrade that position… im thinking maybe 3-4th round but Buffalo should definitely look at JJ Roberts from Marshall University. He is a great player and leader… At his pro day he tested great and is one of the top safetys in this years draft… Ran a 4.41 and would be a great addition… Well Hamlin and Forrest are here on one year deals and Bishop is still a question mark. I can see adding one on day 3 to fill the back end of the roster for this year and be a backup in 2026. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.