schoolhouserock Posted 12 hours ago Posted 12 hours ago My dislike of the Chefs has reached the same level as my dislike for the Patriots***. Quote
DabillsDaBillsDaBills Posted 12 hours ago Posted 12 hours ago 1 hour ago, That's No Moon said: If you choose to believe that was the end you go ahead. You're one of the people who probably lays the previous year on Bass as well. They had the ball at midfield with time and couldn't convert. That KC then finished running out the clock in a game they were already winning is irrelevant. The offense needed to score, had time, and field position and didn't. Again. This matters to me because if you asked me which part of the team I had the most faith in I would have said the offense. Hands down. Get them the ball and they can make it happen. Well, this is two years in a row that side of the ball came up short in the biggest moment. My faith has not been justified. It's not irrelevant though. There was 1:54 left and we had all 3 timeouts. If we had forced a 3 and out (assuming 3 run plays) the offense would have 1:40 left to try and score. Instead the DEF folded like a cheap suit (again) and allowed 2 first downs. Only THEN was the game over and KC could kill the clock. We've set expectations so low on the DEF side of the ball in playoff games that nobody cares when they fail. It's fully expected. If I'm assigning blame for the last 2 losses to the Chiefs I'd say 2023: 90% DEF 5% Bass 5% OFF 2024: 90% DEF 10% OFF The Offense hasn't been perfect in the last 2 losses and they did fail to score on their last possession. However, they put together very strong games against a top defense. The DEF has gotten absolutely trounced by a very mediocre Chiefs offense. 1 2 Quote
That's No Moon Posted 12 hours ago Posted 12 hours ago Just now, DabillsDaBillsDaBills said: It's not irrelevant though. There was 1:54 left and we had all 3 timeouts. If we had forced a 3 and out (assuming 3 run plays) the offense would have 1:40 left to try and score. Instead the DEF folded like a cheap suit (again) and allowed 2 first downs. Only THEN was the game over and KC could kill the clock. We've set expectations so low on the DEF side of the ball in playoff games that nobody cares when they fail. It's fully expected. If I'm assigning blame for the last 2 losses to the Chiefs I'd say 2023: 90% DEF 5% Bass 5% OFF 2024: 90% DEF 10% OFF The Offense hasn't been perfect in the last 2 losses and they did fail to score on their last possession. However, they put together very strong games against a top defense. The DEF has gotten absolutely trounced by a very mediocre Chiefs offense. You can feel however you want. The strength of the team is the offense. It needs to act like it. 30 points a game until it matters most. 1 Quote
mcjeff215 Posted 12 hours ago Posted 12 hours ago Quite honestly, I remember wondering whether they spent the night before hitting the sauce. From the first drive, I was apprehensive. That might be unfair of me, but they seem to show up entirely different when playing on the edge of where they’ve been before. Still happy with the ride and looking forward to it all again. I have no reason to believe this season won’t be as successful. Quote
HappyDays Posted 12 hours ago Posted 12 hours ago I remain discouraged that Andy Reid treats our defense like a scout team in every single playoff matchup. They spent the entire 1st half marching up and down the field uncontested, which is pretty much what they've done every other time. I see no practical reason to be optimistic that this outcome is ever going to change under McDermott, but I have no choice but to wait and see what happens. 3 Quote
ShakAttack Posted 12 hours ago Posted 12 hours ago I don't think about it much anymore, but when I do, it still hurts as a huge missed opportunity. It really all comes down to, by the time Josh Allen retired, will that have been the closest we ever got to a Super Bowl? Hopefully not, but if it is, then yeah, it'll still suck to think about 10+ years later imo. Quote
DapperCam Posted 12 hours ago Posted 12 hours ago I still feel the same way as the day after it happened. Proud of our offense for putting up the most points against the Chiefs of any team for the past 2 seasons.* Disappointed in our defense for allowing the most points to the Chiefs of any team all year.* It was a resounding success on offense and a total failure on defense. Simple as that. * Not counting week 17 vs Broncos where they played all backups. Eagles scored more in the Super Bowl, but it hadn’t happened yet. 1 Quote
Gregg Posted 11 hours ago Posted 11 hours ago 4 minutes ago, ShakAttack said: I don't think about it much anymore, but when I do, it still hurts as a huge missed opportunity. It really all comes down to, by the time Josh Allen retired, will that have been the closest we ever got to a Super Bowl? Hopefully not, but if it is, then yeah, it'll still suck to think about 10+ years later imo. Maybe Terry will get tired of falling short in the playoffs and decide to clean house. I am not saying after this season but if 2 or 3 years go by and now Allen is in his early thirties and still no Super Bowl appearance/championship then maybe then. I know the pitchforks and knives will be out in full force for both Beane and McDermott to be replaced if that is the case. Quote
Matt_In_NH Posted 11 hours ago Posted 11 hours ago 3 hours ago, HamptonBillsfan said: Why would you say that it was so close Very simple, because it was 3 hours ago, HamptonBillsfan said: The NFL is finally changing the way ball placement is implemented using technology as opposed to elderly, out of shape officials running in from 20 yds away to place a ball that was obscured by 6 or 8 giant humans. No they are not Quote
HappyDays Posted 11 hours ago Posted 11 hours ago 7 hours ago, ProcessTruster said: did not get the breaks that the winner of the tournament typically gets. We recovered every single fumble and Mahomes randomly dropped the ball as an unforced error. Bass made all his kicks. How many breaks do you expect us to get? Quote
Orlando Buffalo Posted 10 hours ago Posted 10 hours ago Two points- the Bills were a much better matchup for Eagles than Chiefs because our Oline is very good. second - the "missed" first down I have watched at least 50 times since that day and to miss it initially was terrible, literally top 5 worst calls ever, but to miss it on review tells me the officials are not primarily interested in calling games properly. 1 Quote
Royale with Cheese Posted 10 hours ago Posted 10 hours ago The one "positive" that I can take from this is our defense wasn't good enough to slow down the Eagles much. I think they would have controlled the ball the whole game and a 5th Super Bowl loss without 1 win would be worse than losing to the Chiefs in the playoffs IMO. We weren't built to stop the Eagles either. 1 1 Quote
HamptonBillsfan Posted 10 hours ago Posted 10 hours ago 54 minutes ago, Matt_In_NH said: Very simple, because it was No they are not You can hold onto the idea of it being a good placement if you wish or being to close to complain about but you’d be in the vast minority. Every Sports talk host nationally complained about the bungled call. Why don’t you smarten up and ask google or The NY Times if the NFL is changing the ball placement operation to incorporate technology. Surprised you missed that. You sound like a disgruntled Pats fan. Quote
DapperCam Posted 10 hours ago Posted 10 hours ago 7 minutes ago, Royale with Cheese said: The one "positive" that I can take from this is our defense wasn't good enough to slow down the Eagles much. I think they would have controlled the ball the whole game and a 5th Super Bowl loss without 1 win would be worse than losing to the Chiefs in the playoffs IMO. We weren't built to stop the Eagles either. Our defense wasn't built to stop anybody. But our offense was really good with a great offensive line. I bet a Bills - Eagles SB would have been a one score game, unlike the cathartic beatdown we witnessed. 1 Quote
Jrb1979 Posted 10 hours ago Posted 10 hours ago 1 hour ago, HappyDays said: I remain discouraged that Andy Reid treats our defense like a scout team in every single playoff matchup. They spent the entire 1st half marching up and down the field uncontested, which is pretty much what they've done every other time. I see no practical reason to be optimistic that this outcome is ever going to change under McDermott, but I have no choice but to wait and see what happens. Agreed. My biggest issue is how there isn't much difference in what the Bills do on offense or defense during the regular season and the playoffs. You look at the Chiefs and how they dial up some unexpected plays for the playoffs. My other issue is the idea that cause they only lost by 3 points that just a few player upgrades, some luck and some calls go there way is all that's needed to make a Super Bowl. I can't get there, cause I'm of the belief you need more that just an elite QB to not only get it a Super Bowl but win one. The fact they have been very reluctant to mortgage the future to get some of those elite playmakers doesn't give me much hope that the outcome will change. Quote
Doc Brown Posted 9 hours ago Posted 9 hours ago 8 hours ago, SoCal Deek said: I still say Kincaid just had to catch the damn ball. Kind of a microcosm of the season. Outperform expectations just to get to a spot where we lose to the Chiefs again in nearly the exact same way we lost at least the last two Chief playoff games. A heck of an athlete play by Kincaid to stop on a dime and adjust to the ball just to have it go through his hands. Lake Erie curse. Quote
Matt_In_NH Posted 9 hours ago Posted 9 hours ago (edited) 56 minutes ago, HamptonBillsfan said: You can hold onto the idea of it being a good placement if you wish or being to close to complain about but you’d be in the vast minority. Every Sports talk host nationally complained about the bungled call. Why don’t you smarten up and ask google or The NY Times if the NFL is changing the ball placement operation to incorporate technology. Surprised you missed that. You sound like a disgruntled Pats fan. Go back and read what I wrote please. Did I not say I think he got it? They are not using technology to spot the ball. They are using it instead of chains to determine line of gain. There is a difference. Here is what Google said, smart guy: "The NFL will use technology for virtual line-to-gain measurements next season, but officials will continue to spot the ball". Next time get a clue before you blast off Edited 9 hours ago by Matt_In_NH Quote
Pecker Posted 9 hours ago Posted 9 hours ago Refs screwed us. coaching was bush league allen didn’t play his best no talent around Allen hurts. Quote
HamptonBillsfan Posted 9 hours ago Posted 9 hours ago 1 minute ago, Matt_In_NH said: Go back and read what I wrote please. Did I not say I think he got it? They are not using technology to spot the ball. They are using it instead of chains to determine line of gain. There is a difference. Semantics, if they’re using technology to determine line to gain, it’s because officials are not doing it correctly and game changing screw ups are compromising results. You made it sound like since it was so close Bills fans shouldn’t use it as an excuse. If officials didn’t butcher the call do you think the NFL would have announced the change before even proposing it in front of the competition committee? Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.