Joe Ferguson forever Posted March 21 Posted March 21 (edited) 3 minutes ago, sherpa said: I would have no way of knowing that, but I am not worried about Musk I should have added that I do know a great deal about Naval Aviation and at sea tactics. Left that out. so, no more expertise on this subject than say, someone like me....and less than the WSJ and NYT Edited March 21 by Joe Ferguson forever
sherpa Posted March 21 Posted March 21 5 minutes ago, Joe Ferguson forever said: so, no more expertise on this subject than say, someone like me....and less than the WSJ and NYT I don't know what subject your are referring too, but if it Chinese military plans, I believe I am far more informed than you. Not specifics, but general process of how these things go. And, yes, more informed that the WSJ and NYT, who know nothing. If you are referring to the others I have brought up, far more informed. 1
Orlando Buffalo Posted March 21 Posted March 21 (edited) 28 minutes ago, Joe Ferguson forever said: so, no more expertise on this subject than say, someone like me....and less than the WSJ and NYT Why do you believe the NYT or WSJ know more than I do about global war planning? I spoke with a friend who was in the Pentagon war planning in 2015, about 2 weeks ago. I would bet I have more honest info that the NYT Edited March 21 by Orlando Buffalo 1
Niagara Bill Posted March 22 Posted March 22 4 hours ago, Orlando Buffalo said: Elon Musk isn't the best and brightest? I can't imagine your list of the "best and brightest"- but I think you will be disappointed to know that in Florida we recognize the "best and brightest" for ally and I receive it each and every year, with a ton of room to spare. They need to add trustworthy and he goes to the bottom of the list 1
SectionC3 Posted March 22 Posted March 22 4 hours ago, Orlando Buffalo said: Elon Musk isn't the best and brightest? I can't imagine your list of the "best and brightest"- but I think you will be disappointed to know that in Florida we recognize the "best and brightest" for ally and I receive it each and every year, with a ton of room to spare. This is too easy. Hoax. 2
Orlando Buffalo Posted March 22 Posted March 22 44 minutes ago, Niagara Bill said: They need to add trustworthy and he goes to the bottom of the list Elon Musk has been more open about DOGE then any dept has been in a long time. To argue that point makes you sound stupid. 46 minutes ago, SectionC3 said: This is too easy. Hoax. Why are you just trolling me? The last few posts I have posted you have responded with mentally stunted, juvenile responses without one bit of any intelligence. Is this what being liberal means now? 1
Joe Ferguson forever Posted March 22 Posted March 22 (edited) 51 minutes ago, SectionC3 said: This is too easy. Hoax. yes, but he's a teacher and a child psychologist and a prolific poster on a Bills message board. Those credentials are indeed impressive. Too bad about his syntax and grammar... and transparency? the courts thankfully, intervene again (isn't it weird how primarily financial publications are worried?) https://www.forbes.com/sites/siladityaray/2025/03/11/federal-judge-rules-doge-must-disclose-records-about-its-operation-to-comply-with-federal-transparency-law/ losers don't care... Edited March 22 by Joe Ferguson forever
Joe Ferguson forever Posted March 22 Posted March 22 (edited) 2 hours ago, sherpa said: I don't know what subject your are referring too, but if it Chinese military plans, I believe I am far more informed than you. Not specifics, but general process of how these things go. And, yes, more informed that the WSJ and NYT, who know nothing. If you are referring to the others I have brought up, far more informed. why? splain...cuz you were a pilot? or were you CIA? C'mon. you can say. All that's coming out because trump wants the "deep state" revealed. but now you're a virginia wine producer. musta heard some great stuff in the tasting room. but you're not interested... Edited March 22 by Joe Ferguson forever
sherpa Posted March 22 Posted March 22 2 minutes ago, Joe Ferguson forever said: why? splain...cuz you were a pilot? or were you CIA? C'mon. you can say. All that's coming out because trump wants the "deep state" revealed. but you're not interested... No. And I have no idea what you mean when you you claim that "Trump wants the deep state revealed," and I'm not concerned about any explanation. That seems to be part of this nonsense that you and the other two post that provides nothing of interest. My disagreeing with claims made by you and the other two don't matter. What matters is that Elon Musk has absolutely nothing to do with US military plans/policy re China. To think he does is the stuff of mad men, 1
Joe Ferguson forever Posted March 22 Posted March 22 1 minute ago, sherpa said: No. And I have no idea what you mean when you you claim that "Trump wants the deep state revealed," and I'm not concerned about any explanation. That seems to be part of this nonsense that you and the other two post that provides nothing of interest. My disagreeing with claims made by you and the other two don't matter. What matters is that Elon Musk has absolutely nothing to do with US military plans/policy re China. To think he does is the stuff of mad men, Mad men was either a good tv show or the current US administration. So you weren't CIA. Didn't think so. I'd have more respect if you were. What I mean is that many of your compatriots find this stuff conspiratorial. and you don't object. cuz you're not interested. except in musk who you see as benign despite obvious conflict of interests especially regarding global military calculus. you're analytical til you're not.
sherpa Posted March 22 Posted March 22 48 minutes ago, Joe Ferguson forever said: Mad men was either a good tv show or the current US administration. So you weren't CIA. Didn't think so. I'd have more respect if you were. What I mean is that many of your compatriots find this stuff conspiratorial. and you don't object. cuz you're not interested. except in musk who you see as benign despite obvious conflict of interests especially regarding global military calculus. you're analytical til you're not. We have talked about this before. I was never CIA. I applied, got through the first two hoops, but got an offer that was better in a different industry. Musk doesn't worry me. I think he is genuinely trying to bring a fresh approach to am immensely constipated and dysfunctional behemoth, but has no personal financial goals. Not worried about him at all. What I do worry about are lunatics like AOC, Bernie and that moron VP candidate though I think his idiocy has been exposed. Those policies have never worked anywhere, but ya, let's try them here. Sure. As long as people like that are in our gov, I will always convert US currency into other assets, like equities. That has worked so far. 1 1
sherpa Posted March 22 Posted March 22 Trump announced that Boeing is going to build the "next generation air dominance," (NGAD) airplane, called the F-47. It will be manned, but the pilot will be more of a weapons system manager as it will probably fly autonomously. So in spite of Musk's incompletely formed view, there will be a human in it. 1
Doc Posted March 22 Posted March 22 1 hour ago, sherpa said: Trump announced that Boeing is going to build the "next generation air dominance," (NGAD) airplane, called the F-47. It will be manned, but the pilot will be more of a weapons system manager as it will probably fly autonomously. So in spite of Musk's incompletely formed view, there will be a human in it. Great.
Joe Ferguson forever Posted March 22 Posted March 22 for something that supposedly wasn't going to happen, the pentagon is going to great lengths to stop a similar future leak https://www.cnn.com/2025/03/22/politics/defense-department-polygraph-tests-leaks/index.html
JDHillFan Posted March 22 Posted March 22 6 minutes ago, Joe Ferguson forever said: for something that supposedly wasn't going to happen, the pentagon is going to great lengths to stop a similar future leak https://www.cnn.com/2025/03/22/politics/defense-department-polygraph-tests-leaks/index.html And?
Doc Posted Saturday at 10:29 PM Posted Saturday at 10:29 PM 2 hours ago, Joe Ferguson forever said: for something that supposedly wasn't going to happen, the pentagon is going to great lengths to stop a similar future leak https://www.cnn.com/2025/03/22/politics/defense-department-polygraph-tests-leaks/index.html Could be a trial balloon to see if (bogus) information would get out and then root out the person or people leaking it.
Joe Ferguson forever Posted Sunday at 05:37 AM Posted Sunday at 05:37 AM 6 hours ago, Doc said: Could be a trial balloon to see if (bogus) information would get out and then root out the person or people leaking it. OK. I've been to a wonderful;l wedding. Gives me strength. Gives me hope. Everything else can disappear.
Orlando Buffalo Posted Sunday at 11:12 AM Posted Sunday at 11:12 AM 6 hours ago, Homelander said: You actually don't know the reason that the topic of meetings are classified sometimes?
JDHillFan Posted Sunday at 11:16 AM Posted Sunday at 11:16 AM 5 hours ago, Joe Ferguson forever said: OK. I've been to a wonderful;l wedding. Gives me strength. Gives me hope. Everything else can disappear. Thanks for the update. Can’t wait to hear about what you are doing today.
Recommended Posts