sherpa Posted March 21 Posted March 21 Not that knowing anything means anything in this forum/thread, but having a top security clearance does not permit access to all TD data. You have to have a "need to know." You don't simply walk in and state you have a TS and are granted access to everything. That, friends, is uninformed nonsense.
JDHillFan Posted March 21 Posted March 21 8 minutes ago, Joe Ferguson forever said: No. It involves elections. We had one. The dumb f’s chose a fascist. Maybe we should have had our own Jan 6. But we’re just better than you. 29% approval rating for your party. Why?
Niagara Bill Posted March 21 Posted March 21 9 minutes ago, Joe Ferguson forever said: No. It involves elections. We had one. The dumb f’s chose a fascist. Maybe we should have had our own Jan 6. But we’re just better than you. Hope you all enjoyed it...last call. 1
Joe Ferguson forever Posted March 21 Posted March 21 (edited) 8 minutes ago, sherpa said: Not that knowing anything means anything in this forum/thread, but having a top security clearance does not permit access to all TD data. You have to have a "need to know." You don't simply walk in and state you have a TS and are granted access to everything. That, friends, is uninformed nonsense. Since when did trump follow laws/protocol/rules/traditions? Why would start now? 6 minutes ago, Niagara Bill said: Hope you all enjoyed it...last call. Not ready to throw in the towel yet. The cult isn’t comprised of the best and brightest. Hope Canadians realize that these are mostly the dregs. 40% are predisposed to authoritarianism. Some of them are on this board https://www.politico.com/news/magazine/2020/09/23/trump-america-authoritarianism-420681 Edited March 21 by Joe Ferguson forever 1
SectionC3 Posted March 21 Posted March 21 19 minutes ago, Orlando Buffalo said: Not over my head, why I called you a dope, but the fact that you did not realize that tells me everything about your lack of intelligence. That explains the substantive response you previously gave. Hoax. They should fire you first. Lots of people are saying that.
Orlando Buffalo Posted March 21 Posted March 21 7 minutes ago, Joe Ferguson forever said: Not ready to throw in the towel yet. The cult isn’t comprised of the best and brightest. Hope Canadians realize that these are mostly the dregs. Elon Musk isn't the best and brightest? I can't imagine your list of the "best and brightest"- but I think you will be disappointed to know that in Florida we recognize the "best and brightest" for ally and I receive it each and every year, with a ton of room to spare.
Joe Ferguson forever Posted March 21 Posted March 21 1 minute ago, Orlando Buffalo said: Elon Musk isn't the best and brightest? I can't imagine your list of the "best and brightest"- but I think you will be disappointed to know that in Florida we recognize the "best and brightest" for ally and I receive it each and every year, with a ton of room to spare. No doubt some here are living off disability or social security. Better stock up on dog food https://www.yahoo.com/news/trump-admin-threatens-stop-social-041848651.html
sherpa Posted March 21 Posted March 21 33 minutes ago, Joe Ferguson forever said: Since when did trump follow laws/protocol/rules/traditions? Why would start now? So...Take a claim is is undoubtedly false, and remarkably silly. Run with it in a manner that proves ignorance on the issue. Then suggest accuracy based on a political opponent you hate, without any evidence. This is what makes sense to you people?
AlBUNDY4TDS Posted March 21 Posted March 21 51 minutes ago, Joe Ferguson forever said: No. It involves elections. We had one. The dumb f’s chose a fascist. Maybe we should have had our own Jan 6. But we’re just better than you. Love your elitest attitude! It's a great look for you. 1
JDHillFan Posted March 21 Posted March 21 25 minutes ago, Joe Ferguson forever said: No doubt some here are living off disability or social security. Better stock up on dog food https://www.yahoo.com/news/trump-admin-threatens-stop-social-041848651.html Is it bad if people end up on disability or SS? I doubt anyone wishes for that but it happens. Your ideological pal 4th&wrong will be disappointed to hear of your position.
Joe Ferguson forever Posted March 21 Posted March 21 (edited) 25 minutes ago, sherpa said: So...Take a claim is is undoubtedly false, and remarkably silly. Run with it in a manner that proves ignorance on the issue. Then suggest accuracy based on a political opponent you hate, without any evidence. This is what makes sense to you people? You people? You mean non MAGA s? Undoubtedly false. And you know this because you’re a pilot? Edited March 21 by Joe Ferguson forever
sherpa Posted March 21 Posted March 21 12 minutes ago, Joe Ferguson forever said: You people? You mean non MAGA s? Undoubtedly false. And you know this because you’re a pilot? I don't get into the MAGA or non MAGA thing. Not interested. The issue is ridiculous. Not factual, and crazy. But you and the other two will do what you do here. Idiotic. Predictable and wacky. 1
Joe Ferguson forever Posted March 21 Posted March 21 9 minutes ago, sherpa said: I don't get into the MAGA or non MAGA thing. Not interested. The issue is ridiculous. Not factual, and crazy. But you and the other two will do what you do here. Idiotic. Predictable and wacky. Id rather be wacky following a WSJ story than one from you or any other right wing blogger. I’m not interested in those. 49 minutes ago, AlBUNDY4TDS said: Love your elitest attitude! It's a great look for you. I wonder why MAGAs made this into a bad thing e·lite /iˈlēt/ noun 1.a select group that is superior in terms of ability or qualities to the rest of a group or society:
sherpa Posted March 21 Posted March 21 13 minutes ago, Joe Ferguson forever said: Id rather be wacky following a WSJ story than one from you or any other right wing blogger. I’m not interested in those. I am hardly a "right wing blogger." Don't respond. Easy.
Joe Ferguson forever Posted March 21 Posted March 21 7 minutes ago, sherpa said: I am hardly a "right wing blogger." Don't respond. Easy. I've never seen you question any of the myriad far right conspiracy theories posted here. You know, pizzagate and the like...but a story about an unelected "advisor" with massive influence and access is too far fetched.
sherpa Posted March 21 Posted March 21 3 minutes ago, Joe Ferguson forever said: I've never seen you question any of the myriad far right conspiracy theories posted here. You know, pizzagate and the like...but a story about an unelected "advisor" with massive influence and access is too far fetched. I don't post things that don't interest me. Pizzagate, or whatever, is one of those things. I post when I see something clearly wrong, or when I know something that is being misrepresented. What I have responded to is one of those things. It is idiotic to think that, in spite of public denials, that Musk is informed of specific plans by the US military to respond to Chinese moves in the western Pacific, which would change at a moment's notice based on real world events and US military circumstances. It is idiotic. You and the other two morons are of a different opinion, and that is fine. Not my issue. 1
Joe Ferguson forever Posted March 21 Posted March 21 (edited) 12 minutes ago, sherpa said: I post when I see something clearly wrong, or when I know something that is being misrepresented. and pizza gate or any of the other Q nonsense posted all over this forum don't meet those criteria? I know, you have no interest...you're a selective do gooding, fact checker. Does the "deep state" interest you? plenty of posts about it in virtually every aspect of our govt including the military. and in this case you have no more proof of your concrete belief that the story has no merit than mine, that it might. Edited March 21 by Joe Ferguson forever
sherpa Posted March 21 Posted March 21 3 minutes ago, Joe Ferguson forever said: and pizza gate or any of the other Q nonsense posted all over this forum don't meet those criteria? Nope. Don't care. What I do care about is refuting nonsense about things I am familiar with. I am not at all interested in the politics that causes people like you to politicize every single issue. I know a lot about aviation, and the FAA. I know a lot about 9-11. I think I know a lot about the stock market and the economy, and at least enough to know it can't be predicted. Other than that, or the Bills, which I follow on a daily basis, and this site does a great job on, not interested. 1
Joe Ferguson forever Posted March 21 Posted March 21 4 minutes ago, sherpa said: Nope. Don't care. What I do care about is refuting nonsense about things I am familiar with. I am not at all interested in the politics that causes people like you to politicize every single issue. I know a lot about aviation, and the FAA. I know a lot about 9-11. I think I know a lot about the stock market and the economy, and at least enough to know it can't be predicted. Other than that, or the Bills, which I follow on a daily basis, and this site does a great job on, not interested. you didn't mention deep knowledge of the workings of the highest levells of the pentagon under trump and hegseth nor the latitude trump has or will show musk. those would seem salient in this discussion. I'm confident the reporters from NYT and WSJ do or at a minimum know sources that do. hence the threat to punish the"leakers'.
sherpa Posted March 21 Posted March 21 1 minute ago, Joe Ferguson forever said: you didn't mention deep knowledge of the workings of the highest levells of the pentagon under trump and hegseth nor the latitude trump has or will show musk. those would seem salient in this discussion. I'm confident the reporters from NYT and WSJ do or at a minimum know sources that do. hence the threat to punish the"leakers'. I would have no way of knowing that, but I am not worried about Musk I should have added that I do know a great deal about Naval Aviation and at sea tactics. Left that out. 1
Recommended Posts