Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
52 minutes ago, Joe Ferguson forever said:

did you work in the pentagon?  Were you privy to "OP's" at this level?  Do you believe such a plan including potential Chinese targets exists today?  Because I do...

 

 

No. I didn't work at the Pentagon. Had the opportunity to just before I got out  as the aid to the three star admiral who buys all Naval Air stuff, ie weapons and airplanes, but nobody wants to work there, especially a newly wed west coast Navy guy.

And of course we were privy to those plans.

As I said, when we sailed into threat areas we would look at them. Again, when near Korea we would go over the North Korea stuff. When sailing through the Strat of Malacca we would not fly for those days and go over the Iranian stuff along with other middle east options when entering the Indian Ocean.

We would adjust them based on the weapons and updates to those weapons that we had and what we knew they had, because these things change a lot.

 

Of course a general plan on China exists, but it would include their known capability at the time, and how a general strategy would be carried out.

But it would have very little specificity, as that would depend on the day and time of hostilities, and what assets we had and where they were on that day.

  • Haha (+1) 2
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted
Just now, Doc said:

 

Then I guess it was never a real thing, right?

 

Let's find out. Invite George Soros to the briefing, too

  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted
1 minute ago, Homelander said:

Note: The acting president lacks the necessary security clearance and Senate confirmation required for the sharing of such data.

 

 

 

 

54 minutes ago, Joe Ferguson forever said:

 

Don't you find it alarming that an unelected billionaire with ties to nearly every major military power stands next to the prez in the oval office and spouts policy?  with his son X at his side.  Do you trust the WSJ?  let's see what the market thinks....

The same people who praised the last administration for not having an actual president, who 2 months ago said Trump was a dictator, are now telling me that Elon Musk is the acting president and Trump should go back to claim his power? i don't believe any news sources anymore without confirmation, far too much race to be first vs race to correct. 

  • Like (+1) 2
  • Awesome! (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, Orlando Buffalo said:

 

The same people who praised the last administration for not having an actual president, who 2 months ago said Trump was a dictator, are now telling me that Elon Musk is the acting president and Trump should go back to claim his power? i don't believe any news sources anymore without confirmation, far too much race to be first vs race to correct. 

So you don’t find it alarming?  Not at all?  So ready to swallow his shyte. Maybe you secretly want a militaristic autocracy run by fascist oligarchs. 

7 minutes ago, Homelander said:

No conflict at all.  None.

 

Feb 11, 2025 - Tesla opens Megapack battery factory in China amid nascent trade war

 

 

Which is why he has no business in the Oval Office 

Posted
6 minutes ago, Joe Ferguson forever said:

Maybe you secretly want a militaristic autocracy run by fascist oligarchs. 

You’re doing great! 
 

A couple days ago Roundy was whining because someone wondered why people like him and you are all-in on hyperbole. Good stuff. 

  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted (edited)
12 minutes ago, Joe Ferguson forever said:

So you don’t find it alarming?  Not at all?  So ready to swallow his shyte. Maybe you secretly want a militaristic autocracy run by fascist oligarchs. 

6 minutes ago, Homelander said:

:oops:

 

 

What's the source of the story claiming to know the agenda of the meeting and that specifics about China will be discussed? 

Edited by All_Pro_Bills
Posted
7 minutes ago, JDHillFan said:

You’re doing great! 
 

A couple days ago Roundy was whining because someone wondered why people like him and you are all-in on hyperbole. Good stuff. 


Any time you want to answer my question RE: educational standards, that would be fine. 
 

Why, I almost get the feeling that you’re talking out of your ass and don’t have an actual answer!

Posted
2 minutes ago, All_Pro_Bills said:

What's the source of the story claiming to know the agenda of the meeting and that specifics about China will be discussed? 

 

If you're skeptical, feel free to check out other outlets to help you cope and seethe.

 

  • Awesome! (+1) 1
Posted (edited)

Musk is already weighing in on military operations:  “fighter jets are outdated and will just get pilots killed”

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world/musk-to-receive-top-secret-briefing-on-us-war-plans-for-china/ar-AA1Bm0bb

 

He has weighed in recently on defense acquisitions, calling on the Pentagon to stop buying Lockheed Martin’s F-35 fighter jets and to shift to a large fleet of drones. “Manned fighter jets are obsolete in the age of drones anyway,” he posted to X, his social-media site, in November. “Will just get pilots killed.”

Lockheed Martin owns half of a rocket company that is one of SpaceX’s biggest competitors in space launch.

 

nah, no conflict of interest 

Edited by Joe Ferguson forever
Posted
21 minutes ago, Joe Ferguson forever said:

So you don’t find it alarming?  Not at all?  So ready to swallow his shyte. Maybe you secretly want a militaristic autocracy run by fascist oligarchs. 


Again, we are more alarmed at the fact that Biden was senile, the Democrat party and MSM knew it and lied about it and goodness knows what unelected people were running the show.  

Posted
3 minutes ago, Homelander said:

 

If you're skeptical, feel free to check out other outlets to help you cope and seethe.

 

Other outlets are merely repeating, not verifying, the original anonymously sourced NYT story. Which proves nothing about the validity of the original report. So I ask again. What or who is the source of the original NYT story? 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
Just now, Doc said:


Again, we are more alarmed at the fact that Biden was senile, the Democrat party and MSM knew it and lied about it and goodness knows what unelected people were running the show.  


You do that, we will worry about the right wing’s new fascination with deleting judicial review and allowing the president to do whatever he wants unchecked.

Posted
1 minute ago, sherpa said:

 

An opinion piece, and not at all completely informed on the issue.

Has no impact.

 

Everyone has opinions.

 

 

 

  • Agree 1
Posted
22 minutes ago, Joe Ferguson forever said:

So you don’t find it alarming?  Not at all?  So ready to swallow his shyte. Maybe you secretly want a militaristic autocracy run by fascist oligarchs. 

Which is why he has no business in the Oval Office 

 

This is about Tesla.

Anecdotally, there is a Tesla dealership in Beijing across the street from the silk market.

I have been in there with a guy who owned a Tesla.

He said the Beijing prices were 50% higher in Beijing becasue of Chinese anti US tariffs.

  • Shocked 2
×
×
  • Create New...