B-Man Posted April 7 Posted April 7 Transcript Between Activist Judge Boasberg and DOJ Attorney About Trump Admin 'Defying Him' Is Nuts The more we hear about this Judge Boasberg guy, the more we start to think he may not be all that worried about justice. While we're certainly not experts on these matters, Boasberg's conversation with DOJ Attorney Drew Ensign about the Trump administration sure seems pretty biased, angry, and even a little activist-y https://twitchy.com/samj/2025/04/07/ensign-boasberg-exchange-n2411053
The Frankish Reich Posted April 7 Posted April 7 the DOJ attorney was put on the spot. He was likely going to be cited for contempt himself. He's an attorney; he has no power to "order" anyone in DHS to do anything. All he can do is advise them about how to comply with the judge's order or how to seek a stay of it. He also has a duty of candor to the court. That's in every attorney's ethics pledge. He can lose his license if he violates that duty. So he told the truth: Q. Why can't you bring him back? A. I've asked that question of people with decision-making authority, and I haven't received an adequate response. DOJ's response? Pam Bondi puts him on "administrative leave." And accuses him of not vigorously advocating for her position. For telling the truth. She is free to go before that judge and lie to him if that's what she wants to do, putting her own bar license on the line. I hate when these people try to throw a decent, hard-working lesser government employee under the bus. That's what they did here. Shameful.
BillsFanNC Posted Saturday at 02:59 PM Author Posted Saturday at 02:59 PM 17 minutes ago, B-Man said: . The only card they had to play before the mid terms. But they'd never politicize the judiciary! 😆 They're friggin Marxists. The revolution is the only goal. This is exactly why Biden was nominating Marxists to the federal bench for democrats to rubber stamp.
BillsFanNC Posted Saturday at 04:31 PM Author Posted Saturday at 04:31 PM This. and Martha's Vineyard etc. It's an MS13 holiday extravaganza for wacky leftists!
Big Blitz Posted Saturday at 04:35 PM Posted Saturday at 04:35 PM Step #1: America elects a president with a specific expectation of how he will exercise his powers under Article II of the Constitution. Step #2: Judiciary decides its exercise of its Article III Constitutional powers includes an unconstitutional right to deny the president exercise of his lawful Article II powers. Step #3: Judiciary decides that its unlawful execution of its Article III powers in Step #2 is actually lawful, and nobody can challenge that. This is what Democrats call "democracy," i.e., unelected judges negating the lawful democratic will of the American electorate. Houston, we have a problem. The judiciary is doing the executive equivalent of it telling the justices how to do their jobs - and hindering their work.
Homelander Posted Saturday at 07:34 PM Posted Saturday at 07:34 PM Where’s Judge Cannon when you need her most?
Bill51390 Posted Saturday at 09:32 PM Posted Saturday at 09:32 PM Judges are out of control at the state and local level as well. I see it all the time, judge says I don’t really like this law, dismiss. Or judge dismisses cases because of there personal assumptions without any legal bases. Judges just do whatever they want. It’s insane. 1 1 1
The Frankish Reich Posted Sunday at 01:20 AM Posted Sunday at 01:20 AM We knew it was coming. In light of last night's 7-2 decision, even Trump's 3 Supreme Court appointees are officially Marxists.
Recommended Posts