The Frankish Reich Posted March 18 Posted March 18 Who knew? Article II, Section 2, Clause 1: The President shall be Commander in Chief of the Army and Navy of the United States, and of the Militia of the several States, when called into the actual Service of the United States; he may require the Opinion, in writing, of the principal Officer in each of the executive Departments, upon any Subject relating to the Duties of their respective Offices, and he shall have Power to grant Reprieves and Pardons for Offences against the United States, except in Cases of Impeachment. Got that? Grant Reprieves and Pardons. Not "sign documents with quill pen and ink bottle rendering pardons unto his relatives ..." 1 1
Westside Posted March 18 Posted March 18 Your opinion change’s depending on if there is a R or D in front of it.
Kelly to Allen Posted March 18 Posted March 18 (edited) 1 hour ago, The Frankish Reich said: Who knew? Article II, Section 2, Clause 1: The President shall be Commander in Chief of the Army and Navy of the United States, and of the Militia of the several States, when called into the actual Service of the United States; he may require the Opinion, in writing, of the principal Officer in each of the executive Departments, upon any Subject relating to the Duties of their respective Offices, and he shall have Power to grant Reprieves and Pardons for Offences against the United States, except in Cases of Impeachment. Got that? Grant Reprieves and Pardons. Not "sign documents with quill pen and ink bottle rendering pardons unto his relatives ..." If the left can justify abortion through a privacy clause made up out of thin air, then our side is also going to justify which pardons are permissible under a manner in which it's signed. Competency and all being required too.... In fact I remember a doctor saying under the Biden administration that Biden wasn't competent and his answers didn't make sense. Seems like a perfectly rational explanation for why any pardon he granted is not lawful or justified.... And if Biden wasn't competent, then under whose authority were those pardons granted ??? that needs to be investigated too Want to get silly, let's get silly Edited March 18 by Kelly to Allen 1
4th&long Posted March 18 Posted March 18 4 hours ago, Westside said: Your opinion change’s depending on if there is a R or D in front of it. Just like yours.
BillsFanNC Posted March 18 Posted March 18 It's really strange that this issue has come up to debate regarding a POTUS whose mental fitness is not to be questioned.
Roundybout Posted March 18 Posted March 18 I’m just glad that we’re going to, somehow, survive the greatest scandal of the last 10,000 years. I lost five pounds from stress. There was wailing and gnashing of teeth.
SectionC3 Posted March 18 Posted March 18 5 hours ago, Westside said: Your opinion change’s depending on if there is a R or D in front of it. How do you feel about the validity of the J6 pardons? Also, it's changes, not change's. And the textual reading of the constitution has nothing to do with politics. FYI. Nowhere is it mentioned that a pardon must be signed, or signed in a certain way, or even written.
SectionC3 Posted March 18 Posted March 18 14 minutes ago, BillsFanNC said: ⬆️ Hoax Yeah, sure. Try reading the constitution. For once.
JFKjr Posted March 18 Posted March 18 Ultimately we'll have to determine if Biden had the capacity to do much of anything while president.
All_Pro_Bills Posted March 18 Posted March 18 (edited) 7 hours ago, The Frankish Reich said: Who knew? Article II, Section 2, Clause 1: The President shall be Commander in Chief of the Army and Navy of the United States, and of the Militia of the several States, when called into the actual Service of the United States; he may require the Opinion, in writing, of the principal Officer in each of the executive Departments, upon any Subject relating to the Duties of their respective Offices, and he shall have Power to grant Reprieves and Pardons for Offences against the United States, except in Cases of Impeachment. Got that? Grant Reprieves and Pardons. Not "sign documents with quill pen and ink bottle rendering pardons unto his relatives ..." In the case of the pardons, the issue is was Biden present and aware of the signing off on the pardons with his signature. Or was somebody else pushing the button and "granting" the pardons which would amount to forgery. That's it. Its not a question of constitutional powers. Edited March 18 by All_Pro_Bills 1 1
Recommended Posts