Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
40 minutes ago, Mr. WEO said:

 

the first one did and they (2.85 and 1.58) were actually slower than the second set of numbers (2.69 and 1.53) that dropped his score---and dropped him 81 spots on the "all time".

 

It's all fugazi anyway, these scores...


It’s also  called relative athletic score. His  RAS could have dropped if other LBs had better scores than he did in this class because it’s based on the historical data of the position. The more LBs that score better the more he drops. That’s the only other thing I can think of 

Posted
40 minutes ago, gonzo1105 said:


It’s also  called relative athletic score. His  RAS could have dropped if other LBs had better scores than he did in this class because it’s based on the historical data of the position. The more LBs that score better the more he drops. That’s the only other thing I can think of 

 

It just seemed strange that this guy posted Dolac's pro day data--- and then they changed.  Did he have another pro day after the first?   It also seems weird that with faster splits, he plummeted in rankings.  He's being compared against all LB  RAS data since the 1980's, not just to other guys who might have had pro days a week or 2 ago.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...