gonzo1105 Posted 17 hours ago Posted 17 hours ago 40 minutes ago, Mr. WEO said: the first one did and they (2.85 and 1.58) were actually slower than the second set of numbers (2.69 and 1.53) that dropped his score---and dropped him 81 spots on the "all time". It's all fugazi anyway, these scores... It’s also called relative athletic score. His RAS could have dropped if other LBs had better scores than he did in this class because it’s based on the historical data of the position. The more LBs that score better the more he drops. That’s the only other thing I can think of Quote
Mr. WEO Posted 16 hours ago Posted 16 hours ago 40 minutes ago, gonzo1105 said: It’s also called relative athletic score. His RAS could have dropped if other LBs had better scores than he did in this class because it’s based on the historical data of the position. The more LBs that score better the more he drops. That’s the only other thing I can think of It just seemed strange that this guy posted Dolac's pro day data--- and then they changed. Did he have another pro day after the first? It also seems weird that with faster splits, he plummeted in rankings. He's being compared against all LB RAS data since the 1980's, not just to other guys who might have had pro days a week or 2 ago. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.