Warriorspikes51 Posted yesterday at 08:42 PM Author Posted yesterday at 08:42 PM 1 hour ago, ngbills said: https://www.sportingnews.com/us/nfl/buffalo-bills/news/are-bills-close-signing-80-million-weapon-josh-allen-cooper-kupp-joey-bosa-nfl-los-angeles-rams/80d82c2252574ab64232a2a7 I’m trying to discern is is saying we are one of 5 teams with offers for him? Quote
Aussie Joe Posted yesterday at 08:51 PM Posted yesterday at 08:51 PM (edited) 19 minutes ago, Warriorspikes51 said: I’m trying to discern is is saying we are one of 5 teams with offers for him? It says expression of interest , not offers… Probably meant they rang up and enquired his desired salary range Edited yesterday at 09:01 PM by Aussie Joe Quote
Low Positive Posted yesterday at 09:00 PM Posted yesterday at 09:00 PM 16 minutes ago, Warriorspikes51 said: I’m trying to discern is is saying we are one of 5 teams with offers for him? That story says nothing. They are just speculating and they answer a question with another question, and then report that Kupp will make his decision soon. They have no evidence that the Bills have any interest, jus that they "could." It's the worst kind of story that reputable outlets post that's only purpose is to generate clicks. 1 1 Quote
Miyagi-Do Karate Posted yesterday at 09:04 PM Posted yesterday at 09:04 PM 20 minutes ago, Warriorspikes51 said: I’m trying to discern is is saying we are one of 5 teams with offers for him? 21 minutes ago, Warriorspikes51 said: I’m trying to discern is is saying we are one of 5 teams with offers for him? 12 minutes ago, Aussie Joe said: It says expression of interest , not offers… Probably meant they rang up and enquired his desired salary range 3 minutes ago, Low Positive said: That story says nothing. They are just speculating and they answer a question with another question, and then report that Kupp will make his decision soon. They have no evidence that the Bills have any interest, jus that they "could." It's the worst kind of story that reputable outlets post that's only purpose is to generate clicks. A lot of the sporting news and SI articles now are AI-generated too. Just churning out stuff. 1 Quote
Aussie Joe Posted yesterday at 09:08 PM Posted yesterday at 09:08 PM Just now, Miyagi-Do Karate said: A lot of the sporting news and SI articles now are AI-generated too. Just churning out stuff. Yeah … I do hate these kinda stories … the Bills seem to get linked to everybody on the market … I heard Beane say something that they enquire about a lot of players with other teams and agents … so easy for some juorno to spin that into saying they are “interested “ when they are just doing due diligence.. 1 Quote
ngbills Posted yesterday at 09:15 PM Posted yesterday at 09:15 PM 6 minutes ago, Aussie Joe said: Yeah … I do hate these kinda stories … the Bills seem to get linked to everybody on the market … I heard Beane say something that they enquire about a lot of players with other teams and agents … so easy for some juorno to spin that into saying they are “interested “ when they are just doing due diligence.. Sad state of the media. Most is just copycat material or misleading headlines that are all speculation. 1 1 Quote
HappyDays Posted yesterday at 09:20 PM Posted yesterday at 09:20 PM No more WRs past their prime. We need to draft one by the end of day two and keep the youth pipeline going. Kupp makes no sense for us IMO. 2 2 2 Quote
Warriorspikes51 Posted 23 hours ago Author Posted 23 hours ago 6 minutes ago, HappyDays said: No more WRs past their prime. We need to draft one by the end of day two and keep the youth pipeline going. Kupp makes no sense for us IMO. we could do both? I don’t expect him to sign here…. but it’s a player Josh could view as a souped up Beasley that’s also played almost 40% of his snaps lined up out wide…. Quote
HappyDays Posted 23 hours ago Posted 23 hours ago 17 minutes ago, Warriorspikes51 said: we could do both? We keep 5 WRs every year. I don't see that changing. 2 Quote
Einstein's Dog Posted 23 hours ago Posted 23 hours ago 2 minutes ago, HappyDays said: We keep 5 WRs every year. I don't see that changing. C Kupp or A Cooper > rookie Quote
Warriorspikes51 Posted 23 hours ago Author Posted 23 hours ago 4 minutes ago, HappyDays said: We keep 5 WRs every year. I don't see that changing. fine, trade Samuel if we were to land Kupp and draft a speedy rookie Quote
Aussie Joe Posted 23 hours ago Posted 23 hours ago 33 minutes ago, HappyDays said: No more WRs past their prime. We need to draft one by the end of day two and keep the youth pipeline going. Kupp makes no sense for us IMO. Completely agree with this …. They gotta keep trying to find a decent guy in the draft …. No guarantees about Coleman so far .. Quote
Warriorspikes51 Posted 23 hours ago Author Posted 23 hours ago 2 minutes ago, Aussie Joe said: Completely agree with this …. They gotta keep trying to find a decent guy in the draft …. No guarantees about Coleman so far .. there’s no doubt landing a speed WR with at least decent size should be the goal assuming we do nothing else there Quote
TheWeatherMan Posted 22 hours ago Posted 22 hours ago 1 hour ago, HappyDays said: No more WRs past their prime. We need to draft one by the end of day two and keep the youth pipeline going. Kupp makes no sense for us IMO. How about a WR on this roster, other than Shakir, that’s worthy of seeing meaningful minutes? We still have no #1 WR. 1 Quote
HappyDays Posted 21 hours ago Posted 21 hours ago 1 hour ago, TheWeatherMan said: How about a WR on this roster, other than Shakir, that’s worthy of seeing meaningful minutes? We still have no #1 WR. Kupp is not a #1 at this point in his career, and what we really need is a boundary WR. Metcalf was the big fish to go after. Since we didn't get him there's no sense just throwing bad money at the position. I'm as pro-WR as anyone on here but the move still has to make sense for the team. No #1 WR is coming. Draft someone relatively high and hope that Coleman develops, the rookie hits the ground running, and/or Palmer proves he is more than just a baseline starter. I'm not too happy about it but that's where we're at. 2 Quote
Warriorspikes51 Posted 21 hours ago Author Posted 21 hours ago 5 minutes ago, HappyDays said: Kupp is not a #1 at this point in his career, and what we really need is a boundary WR. Metcalf was the big fish to go after. Since we didn't get him there's no sense just throwing bad money at the position. I'm as pro-WR as anyone on here but the move still has to make sense for the team. No #1 WR is coming. Draft someone relatively high and hope that Coleman develops, the rookie hits the ground running, and/or Palmer proves he is more than just a baseline starter. I'm not too happy about it but that's where we're at. I can see Tee Higgins being a draft day deal (likely not us though) if they get a WR they want Quote
Warriorspikes51 Posted 21 hours ago Author Posted 21 hours ago Adam said Denver, Seattle, Jags, Pats are among the teams and “he doesn’t know the whole list” Quote
RichRiderBills Posted 19 hours ago Posted 19 hours ago I think Kupp likely has some spirit left in him, but no way would I get in any bidding war for him. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.