Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
6 minutes ago, gonzo1105 said:


Im not arguing that  fact I’m just prefacing that there will be value in taking a RB late in the draft versus other positions and I could see Beane adding a guy if he’s at the top of the board. These guys look beyond just next season when drafting. Johnson may have gotten two years but it might only be a 1 year deal for all we know 


Yes …there might be value in a strong class getting a guy say in the 6th that might be a 4th in most years   …but they only put 3 on the team …so if the guy shows anything its going to be hard to keep him on the PS if there are no injuries..

Posted
1 minute ago, SoonerBillsFan said:

100%.  That is why I have no problem packaging Cook and 30 to say Dallas at 12.

The thing I do like about trading Cook is whoever trades for him would likely give him a nice new fat contract as part of the deal. A trade gets us something in return as well as some say so over where he ends up (someplace like Dallas over someplace like KC or NE perhaps) and we avoid losing a good weapon to a rival real ala Barkley to the Eagles 

  • Agree 1
Posted
12 minutes ago, SoonerBillsFan said:

Thanks for the find and post.  I linked this in the FA thread for you.

PSA: X/Twitter had a planned shutdown for a few hours yesterday. Now, if you want to post a link, only the link address will show when you copy & paste. Surprise Surprize! For $11/mo you can have this option restored.. 🤦‍♂️ So be on our best behavior and only link X videos you believe everyone would like to see.

  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, gonzo1105 said:

2 years 5 million is apparently the numbers 

Perfect.  Was thinking someone might offer him 3-4 after seeing Perines contract. 

Posted (edited)
6 minutes ago, BuffaloBillyG said:

The thing I do like about trading Cook is whoever trades for him would likely give him a nice new fat contract as part of the deal. A trade gets us something in return as well as some say so over where he ends up (someplace like Dallas over someplace like KC or NE perhaps) and we avoid losing a good weapon to a rival real ala Barkley to the Eagles 

It gives Beane a better shot odds wise to get a top Defensive talent

Edited by SoonerBillsFan
  • Agree 1
Posted
9 minutes ago, SoonerBillsFan said:

100%.  That is why I have no problem packaging Cook and 30 to say Dallas at 12.

Cook and 30 isn’t nearly enough.  Imo

Posted
9 hours ago, boyst said:

there is a contract for Ty Johnson written. It's sitting on the desk. He can choose it or he can walk. Don't be surprised if he signs it.

🤔

  • Awesome! (+1) 2
Posted (edited)
8 minutes ago, NewEra said:

Cook and 30 isn’t nearly enough.  Imo

 

Not even close.

 

Cook's value isn't what most fans think it is. Running Backs take a hit when it comes to trade value. Guys on the last year of their deal take a hit when it comes to trade value. Guys who want a massive new contract take a hit on trade value.

 

He's probably worth a 4th. A 3rd if we're *really* lucky.

Edited by BillsFanForever19
  • Agree 1
Posted
Just now, BillsFanForever19 said:

 

Not even close.

 

Cook's value isn't what most fans think it is. Running Backs take a hit when it comes to trade value. Guys on their last deal take a hit when it comes to trade value. Guys who want a massive new contract take a hit on trade value.

 

He's probably worth a 4th. A 3rd if we're really lucky.

I agree that it's not enough, but in this case Cook is not being traded for a pick. He's being traded along with a first to sweeten an offer to move up in the draft. The Bills would be trading Cook AND 30 for 12. But I agree that won't get you 12. It could get a pick in the 20's, but teams that need a RB would have to weigh paying the proven Cook over drafting the cost-controlled Hampton. I think Denver at 20 would be a good spot to look. That places Cook's value at a high 3rd, according to the draft value chart. But Dallas might also take 30, 56, and Cook for 12. 

 

https://www.drafttek.com/NFL-Trade-Value-Chart.asp

Posted
7 minutes ago, MikePJ76 said:

Perfect.

 

They are all set for the draft.  

Absolutely not. We have a minimum of four positions on defense that need upgrades, and maybe another WR. There is no way we hit the first 4 or 5 picks outta the park.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...