MrEpsYtown Posted 18 hours ago Posted 18 hours ago I feel like Tyrell Shavers can do everything he can do at a fraction of the cost. I think he can take over that role, especially on special teams. The reality is Hollins played too much. Good role player who was asked to do too much. If we gave him 8 million I would be concerned. 1 Quote
Aussie Joe Posted 18 hours ago Posted 18 hours ago Hate him going to the Patriots… but opens a spot to take a swing in the draft with one of those Top 60 picks 1 Quote
KOKBILLS Posted 18 hours ago Posted 18 hours ago This opens the door for Jayden Higgins... Just saying... 1 Quote
SoonerBillsFan Posted 18 hours ago Posted 18 hours ago 1 minute ago, Victory Formation said: Josh Palmer > Mack Hollins Plus, I don’t think we’re done at WR yet. We can't be. With Hollins gone we are still down 1-2 WR. Quote
klos63 Posted 18 hours ago Posted 18 hours ago 4 minutes ago, Process said: We paid Deonte Harty $5M. Not sure how you let him leave for that.... Doesn't make much sense You know that we cut Harty sheet one season. He obviously wasn't worth the money. Quote
Evansfan322 Posted 18 hours ago Posted 18 hours ago I just wonder if Josh was consulted ? Felt like they had chemistry plus his blocking and special teams 1 Quote
The Firebaugh Kid Posted 18 hours ago Posted 18 hours ago I am shocked that he wouldn’t stay here. There’s no way the bills were gonna pay him a ton but damn this really hurts. 1 Quote
RichRiderBills Posted 18 hours ago Posted 18 hours ago 4 minutes ago, Low Positive said: The Pats had over 120M to spend. They are spending all of it. They did this a few years ago ...just threw out huge contracts day 1 . They regretted a huge chunk of them. Quote
julian Posted 18 hours ago Posted 18 hours ago Can’t blame Mack for taking the Brinks truck load of cash… he may never lead a championship contender, 2 seed in TDs all the way to the title game ever again. I hope we can replace the production. Quote
Shortchaz Posted 18 hours ago Posted 18 hours ago 4 minutes ago, Victory Formation said: Josh Palmer > Mack Hollins Maybe, I bet Hollins is better value. 1 1 2 1 Quote
Brianmoorman4jesus Posted 18 hours ago Posted 18 hours ago Ahhhh that sucks. Cmon man. I was such a dick about Hollins last offseason and then was happily proven wrong. I wanted him back. Hollins has done more then Palmer in my eyes 1 1 Quote
Gunsgoodtime Posted 18 hours ago Posted 18 hours ago 5 minutes ago, notpolian said: It's a bummer. Hope Palmer works out because their stats haven't been all that different. This, we can pay him 12m per year but can't pay Hollins 4? Don't make sense to me 1 1 Quote
No_Matter_What Posted 18 hours ago Posted 18 hours ago (edited) I think this could be an indication that we plan to draft the fifth WR. We have met with quite a few, at least 3 who are expected to go in the first two rounds, and another 3 who are late 3rd/ early 4th projections (we have Bears pick there). I am fine with it. Edit: Unless we somehow land bigger fish, which I am fine with too Edited 18 hours ago by No_Matter_What 1 Quote
Low Positive Posted 18 hours ago Posted 18 hours ago 1 minute ago, RichRiderBills said: They did this a few years ago ...just threw out huge contracts day 1 . They regretted a huge chunk of them. The fact that this is happening again tells you that it's ownership dictating quick fixes to systemic problems. 1 Quote
Jerboski Posted 18 hours ago Posted 18 hours ago Not convinced today made us better… I’ll take Hollins over anyone we signed today 1 1 1 2 Quote
Jrb1979 Posted 18 hours ago Posted 18 hours ago 7 minutes ago, ProcessTruster said: fun player. too expensive for Beane in all likelihood Every one is too expensive for this regime. 1 Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.