billsfan89 Posted 16 hours ago Posted 16 hours ago 12 minutes ago, Bruffalo said: I’m pretty surprised by the fan reaction about this one. Mack was the epitome of a JAG. Fun personality, but not a particularly good WR. Good luck to him, I seriously doubt he has another season as productive as the one he just had. He was an ST Ace that added some punch as a WR4/5. He had 5 TD's and just under 400 yards on limited targets. I wouldn't classify him as a JAG but he was a high end role player. But the Bills simply couldn't justify paying a contract worth up to 5+ million for a high end role player. If this was 2019 and Josh was on a rookie deal yeah over pay for the margins of the roster. But the Bills simply can't overpay a role player even if he's a really fun personality. 1 Quote
quincy Posted 16 hours ago Posted 16 hours ago 14 minutes ago, Bruffalo said: I’m pretty surprised by the fan reaction about this one. Mack was the epitome of a JAG. Fun personality, but not a particularly good WR. Good luck to him, I seriously doubt he has another season as productive as the one he just had. I just hope our next JAG WR can make plays like this when the season is on the line. https://youtu.be/K5Dva8aPEwE 1 Quote
blacklabel Posted 16 hours ago Posted 16 hours ago That's a bummer. I liked Mack. Dude caught nothing but touchdowns or first downs this year. Seriously, of his 31 receptions like 25 were first downs and five others were TDs. Quote
frostbitmic Posted 16 hours ago Posted 16 hours ago With Hollins it's possible that the Bills wanted him back but he wanted to move on ... Maybe he was in the mood for some oysters and lobster rolls. Quote
AlCowlingsTaxiService Posted 16 hours ago Posted 16 hours ago I hope he steps on a piece of glass 😡 1 Quote
MrEpsYtown Posted 16 hours ago Posted 16 hours ago Didn’t realize he was a Josh McDaniels guy with the Raiders. Makes sense there is a connection there as he wants to establish culture with his offense. 2 Quote
ColoradoBills Posted 16 hours ago Posted 16 hours ago 6 minutes ago, billsfan89 said: He was an ST Ace that added some punch as a WR4/5. He had 5 TD's and just under 400 yards on limited targets. I wouldn't classify him as a JAG but he was a high end role player. But the Bills simply couldn't justify paying a contract worth up to 5+ million for a high end role player. If this was 2019 and Josh was on a rookie deal yeah over pay for the margins of the roster. But the Bills simply can't overpay a role player even if he's a really fun personality. But he took more offensive snaps than any other WR/TE/RB. With that many opportunities he had some plays. Bills need other guys to take over those snaps. I don't think the Bills were considering bringing him back. I wish him luck and enjoyed him on the team but it's time for something different this year IMO. 2 Quote
Alphadawg7 Posted 16 hours ago Posted 16 hours ago I’m happy he got the most he could on what could be his last deal. I’m gonna miss the vibe he brought and tenacity. But truth is, with Keon here his skill set became redundant since Keon is a good blocker himself. This is a vote of confidence in Keon IMHO to where they want to see Keon stay in the field and have someone like Palmer, Samuel, a rookie be opposite and pressure downfield more. Thanks for the fun year Mack! 1 1 Quote
tigerthelion Posted 16 hours ago Posted 16 hours ago He definitely showed up against KC in the playoffs. Great touchdown catch. Made a lot more plays during the season than I expected. I think I would not have minded bringing him back at that rate. You know what you are getting with him, at least. 1 Quote
Old Coot Posted 16 hours ago Posted 16 hours ago Pats probably agreed to pay him enough so he could afford shoes. Quote
Low Positive Posted 16 hours ago Posted 16 hours ago 12 minutes ago, MrEpsYtown said: Didn’t realize he was a Josh McDaniels guy with the Raiders. Makes sense there is a connection there as he wants to establish culture with his offense. His best year, by far, was with McDaniels in LV. 690 yards with 4 TDs. This year, he had 378 yards. It did feel like a lot more. 1 Quote
billsfan89 Posted 16 hours ago Posted 16 hours ago 4 minutes ago, ColoradoBills said: But he took more offensive snaps than any other WR/TE/RB. With that many opportunities he had some plays. Bills need other guys to take over those snaps. I don't think the Bills were considering bringing him back. I wish him luck and enjoyed him on the team but it's time for something different this year IMO. Hollins snap counts were influenced by the fact that he was the only WR that played in all 17 games. Shakir missed 2 games, Keon missed 4 games, Samuel was dinged up and missed 3 games. Of course Cooper was traded mid-season and got banged up. Also Hollins was the teams best run blocking WR, so I would imagine that given how run heavy the Bills were he was likely on the field often in running situations. He didn't get many targets so his added pop was noticeable. If Hollins was younger I would have strongly liked the Bills to have made a competitive offer but at age 32 and given where the Bills are at they just weren't in position to pay a premium on what is a high end role player. 1 Quote
Since1981 Posted 16 hours ago Posted 16 hours ago That sucks. the guy was entertaining in every way. Dude smashed on special teams. 1 Quote
rajinka Posted 16 hours ago Posted 16 hours ago 19 minutes ago, quincy said: I just hope our next JAG WR can make plays like this when the season is on the line. https://youtu.be/K5Dva8aPEwE Well if you look at the number of jags that make amazing plays against us every game odds are in our favor Quote
DallasBillsFan1 Posted 16 hours ago Posted 16 hours ago This and Justin Fields to Jets. We're doomed. 1 Quote
ShakAttack Posted 16 hours ago Posted 16 hours ago Never in my life did I think losing a receiver with 500 yards and 4 tds would ruin my vibe on day 1 of free agency, but here we are 1 1 Quote
Doc Brown Posted 16 hours ago Posted 16 hours ago That's a lot. Good for him. The barefoot thing weirded me out though. Quote
Kornfed Posted 16 hours ago Posted 16 hours ago Mack Hollins the man, will flourish wherever he goes in his life. It sure was great having him here for a while though. 1 Quote
ColoradoBills Posted 16 hours ago Posted 16 hours ago 7 minutes ago, billsfan89 said: Hollins snap counts were influenced by the fact that he was the only WR that played in all 17 games. Shakir missed 2 games, Keon missed 4 games, Samuel was dinged up and missed 3 games. Of course Cooper was traded mid-season and got banged up. Also Hollins was the teams best run blocking WR, so I would imagine that given how run heavy the Bills were he was likely on the field often in running situations. He didn't get many targets so his added pop was noticeable. If Hollins was younger I would have strongly liked the Bills to have made a competitive offer but at age 32 and given where the Bills are at they just weren't in position to pay a premium on what is a high end role player. Good points on the injuries of the WRs. Even so, it seems to me you want your skill players to have a better numbers than what his were. He was good at blocking (also good to hear that Palmer is a decent down field blocker). I just see Coleman, Samuel, Palmer and I suspect a speedy rookie getting more of the snaps. I have nothing bad to say about Hollins, just think he is not needed anymore. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.