Doc Brown Posted March 9 Posted March 9 I just laughed. In the end it's usually about the money. Lol. 2 Quote
stuvian Posted March 9 Posted March 9 I guess he can buy Plaxico Burress' Superbowl ring off ebay with that extension Quote
benderbender Posted March 9 Posted March 9 1 minute ago, Doc Brown said: I just laughed. In the end it's usually about the money. Lol. How many more examples do we need? DHop, JJ Watt, pretty much everyone who has ever said they want to go somewhere to win ends up taking the most money offered. Quote
RyanC883 Posted March 9 Posted March 9 25 minutes ago, Nitro said: Saved now from fans demanding Beane to make the trade. Deep draft on pass rushers so relax. I agree. A ploy to get more money to lose. not sure it’s a deep draft at pass rusher. Edge, sure, but most seem to be the edge setting type. That said, some FA’s left who would mix well with draft picks. Mack, Koonce, Sweat (my guess is Phl keeps him), and get a high upside guy like Ivey in the 2nd or get a few in the later rounds. Diggs may be a good grt from Cuse later as a pass rushing specialist. 1 Quote
JohnNord Posted March 9 Posted March 9 1 hour ago, SCBills said: I have no problem with a player like Garrett taking the contract but it makes him look like a hypocrite when he asked for trade and said it’s about winning a Super Bowl and not about money. He ain’t winning ***** in Cleveland over the next few season. It’s ALL about the money. He looks like a huge hypocrite Quote
Doc Brown Posted March 9 Posted March 9 Just now, benderbender said: How many more examples do we need? DHop, JJ Watt, pretty much everyone who has ever said they want to go somewhere to win ends up taking the most money offered. I'd pry have played it exactly the same way Garrett did. I can't blame them. Quote
FireChans Posted March 9 Posted March 9 I’m not shocked he didn’t leave but I think this is a bad football move for the Browns. They will trade him 2-3 years from now for a pittance. The playbook for these dudes is obvious. Get the money now and figure out an exit strategy after. 1 Quote
Doc Brown Posted March 9 Posted March 9 1 minute ago, JohnNord said: I have no problem with a player like Garrett taking the contract but it makes him look like a hypocrite when he asked for trade and said it’s about winning a Super Bowl and not about money. He ain’t winning ***** in Cleveland over the next few season. It’s ALL about the money. He looks like a huge hypocrite No. Don't worry. Watson will come back late in this year and turn into his 2020 self leading the Browns to the Super Bowl. 1 Quote
RyanC883 Posted March 9 Posted March 9 this is what bad teams do. overpay at DE when they lack a QB, RB, etc. Quote
FireChans Posted March 9 Posted March 9 15 minutes ago, davefan66 said: Old man!!?? 👴 I kinda thought it was just a ploy by the Seahawks to have him look for a trade. Always had hope it was for real.”. Now that Geno and Lockett are gone? Feel DK does want to leave. Couple all that with the fact the ‘Hawks supposedly reduced the ask from first and third to a second? All signs point to a departure. Yeah DK feels more likely to move than Garrett ever did. still a fair shot he gets paid and sticks around. Quote
RyanC883 Posted March 9 Posted March 9 (edited) 1 hour ago, SCBills said: Bigger worry for us should be DK doesn’t want to play in the cold because of his asthma and Hendrickson now costs 30M per year, at minimum, on extension with Garrett and Crosby’s deals. He won’t get paid like them, but like Saquon’s deal and Cook, they will be referenced. DK seemed fine in the Seattle cold. Bettis played at ND and Pittsburgh with asthma. Perhaps DK has it worse? Edited March 9 by RyanC883 Quote
davefan66 Posted March 9 Posted March 9 Just now, FireChans said: Yeah DK feels more likely to move than Garrett ever did. still a fair shot he gets paid and sticks around. Always a shot he stays. Who knows. Money trumps winning a lot in this league. Quote
ColoradoBills Posted March 9 Posted March 9 40 minutes ago, Warriorspikes51 said: But wait! I thought the Browns couldn’t afford to do this because of Watson right? what a joke. The cap is just a traffic cone you can drive around No. They shouldn't have because of Watson. They just pushed out his cap hit (now $54M and will be even more next year) into 2027 when he will no longer be on the team, and they will be FORCED to take the cap hit. The cap hit will not "disappear". https://www.spotrac.com/nfl/player/_/id/21753/deshaun-watson Quote
nucci Posted March 9 Posted March 9 1 hour ago, SCBills said: “I want to win” code switches real quick when a team pays you 35-40M per year as a pass rusher. it would for me Quote
BuffaloBillyG Posted March 9 Posted March 9 30 minutes ago, Stretch said: The Browns are so awful I thought Garrett might actually want out…it made sense. Metcalf on the other hand I think is just looking for the biggest pay day. I flipped that from the get go. Browns are run so awful I knew they would cave with a huge contract. I do think DK wants the big payday, but I think he knows he's not getting it in Seattle and frankly I don't think he likes the way the new staff uses him. I'm betting he's a Charger at some point soon. Quote
Nihilarian Posted March 9 Posted March 9 Micah Parsons and Trey Hendrickson are both talking to their agents now... Quote
DJB Posted March 9 Posted March 9 This guy doesn’t care about winning I guess and just the bag Screw him 1 Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.