Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
2 minutes ago, gonzo1105 said:


I don’t think so on Hendrickson but I agree he’d be very expensive with the extension. I do agree that Harold Landry would be more cost effective and would upgrade what we have at a more cost effective number between 10-12 mill

 

I don't think there is any chance you're getting landry for that low, he's an all pro who had 31.5 sacks the past 3 years, only missing 2 games. I'm going to assume around what Rousseau is getting.

Posted
14 minutes ago, Warriorspikes51 said:


Hendrickson will go to Commanders and DK will go to Chargers. Hope I’m wrong and we get one

I'll be pissed if either goes for cheap.  I hate it when teams over value picks.

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
5 minutes ago, BuffaloBillsGospel2014 said:

 

I don't think there is any chance you're getting landry for that low, he's an all pro who had 31.5 sacks the past 3 years, only missing 2 games. I'm going to assume around what Rousseau is getting.


Yea your probably right just hoping haha 

  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted

Well on to the draft.

 

I do want to hear Garrett complain when the Browns fail to make the playoffs every year of that deal.

Posted

Saved now from fans demanding Beane to make the trade.  Deep draft on pass rushers so relax.

10 minutes ago, Bills!Win! said:

I thought that Myles Garrett wanted to win a Super Bowl and go to the hall of fame? 
 

 Why can’t we have more people in the world like Josh Allen? Who just mean what they say

I agree.  A ploy to get more money to lose.  

Posted
2 minutes ago, NyQuil said:

Well on to the draft.

 

I do want to hear Garrett complain when the Browns fail to make the playoffs every year of that deal.

He can take a bath in cash like Scrooge McDuck. 

Posted
48 minutes ago, BuffaloBillyG said:

I called this early on in the original thread.

 

When are people gonna learn that more times than not this is the way these tactics end up with high level players? I swear y'all like Charlie Brown trying to kick the football year after year.

 

 

The Browns are so awful I thought Garrett might actually want out…it made sense.  Metcalf on the other hand I think is just looking for the biggest pay day.

Posted
1 hour ago, davefan66 said:

Oh well.

 

Get me Metcalf then.

Metcalf isn't going anywhere either. How many times do we have to teach you this lesson old man?

  • Eyeroll 2
  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted
Just now, Malazan said:

Metcalf isn't going anywhere either. How many times do we have to teach you this lesson old man?


Old man!!?? 👴

 

I kinda thought it was just a ploy by the Seahawks to have him look for a trade. Always had hope it was for real.”. Now that Geno and Lockett are gone?  Feel DK does want to leave.  Couple all that with the fact the ‘Hawks supposedly reduced the ask from first and third to a second?  All signs point to a departure.

  • Awesome! (+1) 1
Posted
58 minutes ago, Charles Romes said:

$123.5 guaranteed!  

So brownsie, 

Posted

Cowboys and Bengals most affected. 
 

Parsons is going to want more than 40M per year and the Bengals already stated that Ja’Marr Chase will be the highest paid non-QB when they get the deal done. 

  • Like (+1) 2

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...