Watkins90 Posted 8 hours ago Posted 8 hours ago 4 hours ago, Dr. Who said: No, he won't be blamed if the players aren't available. What this highlights is that a lot of rhetoric from players about wanting to play for a contender turns out to just be a negotiating tactic for more money, who knew? I think Garrett wanted to be traded and it isn't about the money, but more about the browns telling him we aren't teasing you so either play on your current contact, sit out and don't get to advance an a year, or become the highest paid non-qb in the league. Which he just is making best of a bad situation. Really, it's dumb of Cleveland to do this. They needed a hard reset and he would have gotten them a lot of assets to help rebuild. Quote
Dr. Who Posted 8 hours ago Posted 8 hours ago 2 minutes ago, Watkins90 said: I think Garrett wanted to be traded and it isn't about the money, but more about the browns telling him we aren't teasing you so either play on your current contact, sit out and don't get to advance an a year, or become the highest paid non-qb in the league. Which he just is making best of a bad situation. Really, it's dumb of Cleveland to do this. They needed a hard reset and he would have gotten them a lot of assets to help rebuild. That's possible, of course. They are just that dumb. Quote
Chicken Boo Posted 7 hours ago Posted 7 hours ago 5 hours ago, gonzo1105 said: Apparently money can solve problems It's the root of many, so there's that. Quote
Chicken Boo Posted 7 hours ago Posted 7 hours ago 5 hours ago, Special K said: Tired of players "demanding a trade"........ if all they want is more money.......sad that a lot of these guys truly do not care about winning. Would you rather have a Super Bowl ring or $123,000,000? It's an easy choice, really. 1 Quote
nucci Posted 7 hours ago Posted 7 hours ago 5 hours ago, Special K said: Tired of players "demanding a trade"........ if all they want is more money.......sad that a lot of these guys truly do not care about winning. it's negotiating Quote
danc Posted 6 hours ago Posted 6 hours ago 1 hour ago, eball said: I’m so &$@ing done with this team! Bye😁 Quote
Special K Posted 6 hours ago Posted 6 hours ago (edited) 17 minutes ago, Chicken Boo said: Would you rather have a Super Bowl ring or $123,000,000? It's an easy choice, really. How about 123 Million on a loser team or 90 Million and a chance to win multiple Super Bowls?? Truly, what can you do with 123 Million that you can't do with 90 Million??? No one is asking the guy to play for free, he would still get paid on a contender.....just not the maximum..... if its all about money, then don't act like you want a trade to a "winner"..... just shut up and let your agent handle it. Edited 6 hours ago by Special K 1 1 Quote
JakeFrommStateFarm Posted 6 hours ago Posted 6 hours ago Bills fans when they realize there's no Garrett, Hendrickson or Metcalf and Von gets resigned Quote
97bills Posted 5 hours ago Posted 5 hours ago 3 hours ago, Augie said: Haslam just has to get more outrageously stupid with every deal to get players to play for him. What idiotic thing is next??? 😂 In feel for Browns fans. They don’t deserve this. That franchise is so bad, it’s unbelievable, if you didn’t see it for your self Quote
Kirby Jackson Posted 5 hours ago Posted 5 hours ago 3 hours ago, Warcodered said: They could have both players it's definitely possible, Groot got extended because he's our best DE on the team right now and only 24, at that price it was a great deal. No they can’t. They aren’t and weren’t going to be able to allocate 35%-40% of the cap to the DL. That’s certainly true with Josh Allen. They can afford 1 more guy, maybe, in the Rousseau/Oliver range. They aren’t in the Garrett and Hendrickson range. Quote
Saint Doug Posted 5 hours ago Posted 5 hours ago So, Garrett chooses money over winning. I guess it’s fine not getting him. Quote
Chicken Boo Posted 5 hours ago Posted 5 hours ago 1 hour ago, Special K said: How about 123 Million on a loser team or 90 Million and a chance to win multiple Super Bowls?? Truly, what can you do with 123 Million that you can't do with 90 Million??? No one is asking the guy to play for free, he would still get paid on a contender.....just not the maximum..... if its all about money, then don't act like you want a trade to a "winner"..... just shut up and let your agent handle it. It's not about what you can or can't do with said amounts of money. Show me a billionaire that's content with what they have. $33M is a significant amount of money, and mutiple Super Bowl rings aren't guaranteed no matter where he may have landed. Everybody has a price. No one should be shocked. Quote
SoCal Deek Posted 5 hours ago Posted 5 hours ago Thank goodness we didn’t enter a bidding war for our long snapper. I’d have gone off if we made Ferguson the highest paid non-QB in history. 1 Quote
PonyBoy Posted 5 hours ago Posted 5 hours ago 3 hours ago, eball said: I’m so &$@ing done with this team! Ok.... Looking forward to your posts in September 😀 Quote
jaab1028 Posted 5 hours ago Posted 5 hours ago That's Ok,Dude was part of that 0-16 Season.Don't need his Karma,lol Quote
boater Posted 4 hours ago Posted 4 hours ago There are 31 other teams chasing elite talent like Garrett. And most of them have more money to throw at it. It's a bit arrogant or delusional to think that the Bills are always in the Top-5 to sign someone. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.