Jauronimo Posted yesterday at 04:12 PM Posted yesterday at 04:12 PM 13 hours ago, Buffalo716 said: Because our defense needs more than Gregg or Bernard to be good lol Like I'm not saying they're they're the best players in the NFL but if you think DK is better than both of them I don't know what to tell you that's your opinion If we put better defensive tackles around them and a better defensive end they would look better.. Bernard had a better AV then Nick Bolton has ever had in his career Even Ray Lewis didn't look as dominant when he didn't have the front in front of him... Like Bernard needs guys clogging Lanes to be effective.. we don't have a lot of good defensive linemen you can't get rid of your best defensive end who actually would have been in line for that contract with any team You need a lot more than two good players to have a good NFL defense You need 12-14 guys .. you need a starting 11 plus some guys you could put in in rotation We're not there I don't know why people think we're doing less with more.. McDermott's doing more with less His entire team has been built on mid round picks that he developed.. he's not getting a bunch of Blue Chip guys to work with Greg and Benford and Bernard would start on the majority of NFL football teams they just need good players around them... There's only one miles Garrett and one deion Sanders Every other player needs people around them that's why it's a team game.. McDermott took a Brown's castaway in poyer er and made him an All-Pro... Took a role player from Green Bay and hyde and made him an All-Pro Took a fifth round pick in Milano and made him an All-Pro Took a six round pick in Benford and made him a really good corner Sean McDermott develops players at a higher rate than any coach in the NFL beane hasn't given him enough Beane's biggest weakness has been the resources deployed to the D line which remains a weakness. Groot and Oliver were first round picks and both have been good but far from difference makers. The Miller signing was a bust. Injury related, but a bust nonetheless. We drafted AJE and Basham with second round picks and the return was a depth player and a guy who is nearly out of the league. Star was signed to a big contract in FA and his play remained a subject of hot debate on this board. So many free agent signings were completely lackluster from Poona, to Settle, Jefferson, Vernon Butler. Addison, floyd, and DaQuan were nice signings that panned out however briefly. 3 1 Quote
Mikey152 Posted yesterday at 04:26 PM Posted yesterday at 04:26 PM 1 hour ago, FireChans said: The Diggs trade is legitimately the second best move of Beane’s entire tenure. Second only to the Allen pick. Without debate. Without debate? That pick, the literal pick, was used to select Justin Jefferson. If anything, I think that highlights that doing the right thing doesn't necessarily always lead to the best outcomes. Quote
appoo Posted yesterday at 05:32 PM Posted yesterday at 05:32 PM Love Milton Williams + Derrick Brown on pass rush downs for Carolina Quote
FireChans Posted 23 hours ago Posted 23 hours ago @Magox are we starting to get a little nervous? Quote
Magox Posted 23 hours ago Posted 23 hours ago 10 minutes ago, FireChans said: @Magox are we starting to get a little nervous? I will let you know in about a week Quote
Shaw66 Posted 23 hours ago Posted 23 hours ago 1 hour ago, Jauronimo said: Beane's biggest weakness has been the resources deployed to the D line which remains a weakness. Groot and Oliver were first round picks and both have been good but far from difference makers. The Miller signing was a bust. Injury related, but a bust nonetheless. We drafted AJE and Basham with second round picks and the return was a depth player and a guy who is nearly out of the league. Star was signed to a big contract in FA and his play remained a subject of hot debate on this board. So many free agent signings were completely lackluster from Poona, to Settle, Jefferson, Vernon Butler. Addison, floyd, and DaQuan were nice signings that panned out however briefly. I think your observations are good. I think that Beane's done a good job with the money he has to spend on d line. He needs 8-10 decent linemen to play McD's rotation. He can't afford to buy both depth and talent. On top of that,McD demands versatility. So, in the first round you get Rousseaus and Olivers, not boom or bust talents. Given those constraints, I think Beane has done well 1 Quote
McDeerInTheHeadlights Posted 22 hours ago Posted 22 hours ago Holding the same talent level while increasing the cost base is never a good move. The big bet here is on the player improving and taking that next step in his development. Not very likely for a DE entering his 4th of 5th season, especially when you consider that the part of the game where he is lacking is the one real talent is born with. Quote
HappyDays Posted 22 hours ago Posted 22 hours ago Josh Sweat ended up getting a slightly lower AAV: https://x.com/AdamSchefter/status/1899176064917873143?s=19 Tweets aren't embedding right now but he got 4 years $76.4M. In my mind they're approximately the same caliber of player, Sweat offers more pass rush Rousseau offers more edge setting. 2 Quote
LEBills Posted 22 hours ago Posted 22 hours ago 1 minute ago, HappyDays said: Josh Sweat ended up getting a slightly lower AAV: https://x.com/AdamSchefter/status/1899176064917873143?s=19 Tweets aren't embedding right now but he got 4 years $76.4M. In my mind they're approximately the same caliber of player, Sweat offers more pass rush Rousseau offers more edge setting. greg is three years younger too. 1 Quote
FireChans Posted 18 hours ago Posted 18 hours ago 6 hours ago, Mikey152 said: Without debate? That pick, the literal pick, was used to select Justin Jefferson. If anything, I think that highlights that doing the right thing doesn't necessarily always lead to the best outcomes. Yes without debate. It was the second most impact a singular addition had on wins of Beane’s career, second only to Josh. Is JJ even there if teams know we are WR needy in the first? Maybe, maybe not. If he is there, do we even take him? Maybe, maybe not. If we take JJ instead have the same or better impact? Maybe. We’ll never know. What we do know is that trading for Diggs is second in “wins added” CLEARLY imo. I don’t think you can make a reasonable debate for any other single player outside of Josh in Beane’s tenure, but you are welcome to try. Quote
Mikie2times Posted 18 hours ago Posted 18 hours ago 6 hours ago, Mikey152 said: Without debate? That pick, the literal pick, was used to select Justin Jefferson. If anything, I think that highlights that doing the right thing doesn't necessarily always lead to the best outcomes. Combined with one of the worst decisions to extend him early. He had the history and was showing the history before our eyes. We treated throwing money at him like a divorce ready couple having a kid. The conclusion sort of takes the appeal of the initial move (which I agree was good) but part of the game is recognizing when the deck is no longer in your favor and walking away. We doubled down and that was a mistake. Quote
FireChans Posted 18 hours ago Posted 18 hours ago 5 hours ago, Magox said: I will let you know in about a week I’ll tell you, I’m getting more nervous. Quote
Magox Posted 17 hours ago Posted 17 hours ago 22 minutes ago, FireChans said: I’ll tell you, I’m getting more nervous. Day 1, they got the WR I wanted. I posted about him quite a few times going back 2-3 weeks. If they don’t swing for the fences with Hendrickson then with what’s left I’m leaning Za’Darius Smith. He’s still producing well and probably can be had without breaking the bank. Quote
FireChans Posted 17 hours ago Posted 17 hours ago 22 minutes ago, Magox said: Day 1, they got the WR I wanted. I posted about him quite a few times going back 2-3 weeks. If they don’t swing for the fences with Hendrickson then with what’s left I’m leaning Za’Darius Smith. He’s still producing well and probably can be had without breaking the bank. Josh Palmer was your #1 offseason WR target? I think that may be enough to diagnose you with Stockholm syndrome 1 Quote
Warriorspikes51 Posted 14 hours ago Posted 14 hours ago https://x.com/nextgenstats/status/1899177547411423274?s=46 Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.