Low Positive Posted Saturday at 01:20 AM Posted Saturday at 01:20 AM Just now, Warriorspikes51 said: why because a few players express desire for warm weather when traded? Garrett already said he doesnt mind snow😉 Players not only demanding trades, but also forcing certain destinations. Quote
Warriorspikes51 Posted Saturday at 01:21 AM Posted Saturday at 01:21 AM Anyone else on the Seattle roster we should be interested in? Since they are in tear down mode Quote
davefan66 Posted Saturday at 01:23 AM Posted Saturday at 01:23 AM 20 minutes ago, playaction said: Doesn't change Sanders at 6. But gives some protection. I wouldn't take SS that high I wouldn’t take Sanders period. Not interested in the circus that his father will be. Quote
nosejob Posted Saturday at 01:25 AM Posted Saturday at 01:25 AM 9 minutes ago, frostbitmic said: We should've drafted Geno over EJ. Or some team can draft their kids. 1 Quote
YoloinOhio Posted Saturday at 01:27 AM Posted Saturday at 01:27 AM Just now, nosejob said: Or some team can draft their kids. We can draft genos cousin in 2027 Quote
Low Positive Posted Saturday at 01:28 AM Posted Saturday at 01:28 AM Just now, YoloinOhio said: We can draft genos cousin in 2027 The Bills would have to SUCK in 2026 for that to happen. 1 Quote
Don Otreply Posted Saturday at 01:34 AM Posted Saturday at 01:34 AM Welp, that’s the end of his career…, Quote
BuffaloBillyG Posted Saturday at 01:34 AM Posted Saturday at 01:34 AM What may make this make sense to me is if they go with a weapon on offense at 6. Try and sneak up in back of round 1 for Milroe. Let him sit and develop for a year or two behind Geno. Not that I think Milroe is going to be great in the NFL, but he may have a shot if he's got basically a red shirt year this year. Pete hid Wilson for years. I could see it Quote
playaction Posted Saturday at 01:40 AM Posted Saturday at 01:40 AM 33 minutes ago, Captain Hindsight said: If they just gave up a day 2 pick, they are not taking a QB at 6 This class is not good. Moves like this show what teams think of the top QBs Unless they think that Sanders will be gone by 6? I agree, even Ward is not that good. But the teams at the top of the selection process, sans *NE, really need QBs Quote
nosejob Posted Saturday at 01:41 AM Posted Saturday at 01:41 AM 5 minutes ago, BuffaloBillyG said: What may make this make sense to me is if they go with a weapon on offense at 6. Try and sneak up in back of round 1 for Milroe. Let him sit and develop for a year or two behind Geno. Not that I think Milroe is going to be great in the NFL, but he may have a shot if he's got basically a red shirt year this year. Pete hid Wilson for years. I could see it What? imo Milroe is not gonna cut it. Quote
BuffaloBillyG Posted Saturday at 01:44 AM Posted Saturday at 01:44 AM 1 minute ago, nosejob said: What? imo Milroe is not gonna cut it. Oh I fully agree. But in the right system, with the right coaching and a year or two working on his passing....he's got the athletic profile you want. Kid COULD develop into a star. He could also (and my bet) be Anthony Richardson 2.0. Quote
Herc11 Posted Saturday at 01:48 AM Posted Saturday at 01:48 AM 59 minutes ago, GETTOTHE50 said: Holy ***** ***** the raider fans must be so ***** excited I mean think about it.. geno vs Herbert? vs Mahomes?! dam raider fans must be chomping at the bit with those match ups. ***** #######s It was a smarter move than drafting one this year. 1 1 Quote
Steptide Posted Saturday at 01:57 AM Posted Saturday at 01:57 AM 1 hour ago, Mike in Horseheads said: Hell we got a 3rd for Tyrod! True, but he had just made the playoffs after a 17 year drought. Also, if I remember correctly, the Browns had a crap ton of draft picks that year 1 Quote
FireChans Posted Saturday at 02:37 AM Posted Saturday at 02:37 AM 1 hour ago, Warriorspikes51 said: A hilarious offer. Get an elite EDGE with no QB and 1 WR. 1 Quote
DCofNC Posted Saturday at 02:41 AM Posted Saturday at 02:41 AM Seems like a lot for him honestly. Quote
Low Positive Posted Saturday at 02:42 AM Posted Saturday at 02:42 AM Just now, DCofNC said: Seems like a lot for him honestly. He had over 4,000 passing yards last year. 1 Quote
DCofNC Posted Saturday at 02:56 AM Posted Saturday at 02:56 AM 13 minutes ago, Low Positive said: He had over 4,000 passing yards last year. Only about 1500 short of what he could have had if he had an ounce of pocket presence. 1 Quote
billsfan89 Posted Saturday at 03:14 AM Posted Saturday at 03:14 AM Wonder if this is a sign that Seattle is getting Darnold? Geno's not a franchise guy but he's a "starting" caliber QB. Carroll has a lot of familiarity with him so it makes sense for the Raiders who have nothing at QB to at least get competent QB play esp for a fairly modest price. It kind of allows the Raiders to "punt" on this years QB class which isn't the best and then when they make a move for a QB in 2026 they still have a veteran option in there in Geno to be a stop gap. Quote
Amaru523 Posted Saturday at 03:16 AM Posted Saturday at 03:16 AM 18 minutes ago, DCofNC said: Only about 1500 short of what he could have had if he had an ounce of pocket presence. Geno was awesome last year........ until they got in the red zone, at that point he would usually $h*t his pants. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.