Steptide Posted March 8 Posted March 8 This seems like a beane signing any other year. The fact that we haven't even heard the bills are interested makes me think they're doing all they can to get Garrett Quote
Aussie Joe Posted March 8 Posted March 8 7 minutes ago, Steptide said: This seems like a beane signing any other year. The fact that we haven't even heard the bills are interested makes me think they're doing all they can to get Garrett The Bills eventually get linked by someone in the media to every big name available player … it will come…. Just focusing on DK and Garrett first Quote
Warriorspikes51 Posted March 8 Posted March 8 13 minutes ago, Steptide said: This seems like a beane signing any other year. The fact that we haven't even heard the bills are interested makes me think they're doing all they can to get Garrett except the Browns are refusing to allow Garrett to seek a trade with no end in sight Hendrickson’s career took off in New Orleans under the Senior Defensive Asst we just added to our staff IMO that increases our chance of targetting him Quote
RichRiderBills Posted March 8 Posted March 8 14 minutes ago, Steptide said: This seems like a beane signing any other year. The fact that we haven't even heard the bills are interested makes me think they're doing all they can to get Garrett We tried to sign him when he left NO Quote
Warriorspikes51 Posted March 8 Posted March 8 1 minute ago, RichRiderBills said: We tried to sign him when he left NO really? Didn’t know that. That plus the D asst we just added makes me think he’s a strong target Quote
Steptide Posted March 8 Posted March 8 13 minutes ago, RichRiderBills said: We tried to sign him when he left NO Even more reason to think they're trying to get Garrett. If Garrett was completely off the table, I believe beane makes this signing immediately Quote
Warriorspikes51 Posted March 8 Posted March 8 1 minute ago, Steptide said: Even more reason to think they're trying to get Garrett. If Garrett was completely off the table, I believe beane makes this signing immediately signing? Hendrickson requires a trade 1 Quote
Aussie Joe Posted March 8 Posted March 8 Just now, Warriorspikes51 said: signing? Hendrickson requires a trade Yes … and that involves the Bengals agreeing to send him here … not a lot of chance of that happening when he will have a decent trade market Quote
Steptide Posted March 8 Posted March 8 19 minutes ago, Warriorspikes51 said: signing? Hendrickson requires a trade OK, regardless, I still think it's a good sign they're trying to get Garrett Quote
Warriorspikes51 Posted March 9 Posted March 9 I imagine he will get around 35 Mil per on a new deal Quote
Dr. Who Posted March 9 Posted March 9 Just now, Warriorspikes51 said: I imagine he will get around 35 Mil per on a new deal I'm not considering him as a legit option for us. If it turns out otherwise, great. 1 1 Quote
Warriorspikes51 Posted March 9 Posted March 9 4 minutes ago, Dr. Who said: I'm not considering him as a legit option for us. If it turns out otherwise, great. the only reason I am is because we hired a defensive assistant who Hendrickson credits for him becoming a very good Edge Quote
Dr. Who Posted March 9 Posted March 9 Just now, Warriorspikes51 said: the only reason I am is because we hired a defensive assistant who Hendrickson credits for him becoming a very good Edge I'd be surprised if the Bengals would consider trading him to us, but okay. 1 Quote
Low Positive Posted March 9 Posted March 9 Just now, Dr. Who said: I'd be surprised if the Bengals would consider trading him to us, but okay. He'll be a Commie before the week is through. The NFC North just played the NFC East this year so they can trade him and not have it blow up in their face. 1 Quote
SCBills Posted March 9 Posted March 9 (edited) Bengals people believe their FO has basically told Hendrickson to find a trade that blows them away or else he’s playing for Cinci next year. If I’m the Bills, I tell his agent that we will make an offer to tempt them but only if he’s willing to sign long term on a team friendly contract. His other option is playing in Cinci and then becoming a FA another year older. Similar to DK, I don’t know how many teams are willing to give away a premium asset(s) and extend at 30M+ per year. As pointed out above.. Commanders make sense. And if they’re involved, we’re not getting Hendrickson. Edited March 9 by SCBills 1 Quote
FLFan Posted March 9 Posted March 9 11 minutes ago, SCBills said: Bengals people believe their FO has basically told Hendrickson to find a trade that blows them away or else he’s playing for Cinci next year. If I’m the Bills, I tell his agent that we will make an offer to tempt them but only if he’s willing to sign long term on a team friendly contract. His other option is playing in Cinci and then becoming a FA another year older. Similar to DK, I don’t know how many teams are willing to give away a premium asset(s) and extend at 30M+ per year. As pointed out above.. Commanders make sense. And if they’re involved, we’re not getting Hendrickson. This is what I have thought from the beginning. Cincy has every intention of keeping him and making him play out his existing contract. They do not appear to be very interested in a lucrative extension. This is how the Bengals roll. Quote
BuffBillsForLife Posted March 9 Posted March 9 Cinci wouldn't trade him to us unless the offer is earth-shattering. I mean really, would a team really do that? Trade with its biggest rival? Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.