ColoradoBills Posted 3 hours ago Posted 3 hours ago I know this a touchy subject with Bills fans, but I'm OK giving Cook $12.5M AAV which makes him the 4th highest in the league. I wouldn't do anything more than that. Cook along with players like Spencer Brown and Shakir need to have their cap pushed out to make room for a 3-4 year run with Josh. 6 Quote
Buffalo_Stampede Posted 3 hours ago Author Posted 3 hours ago 1 minute ago, QCity said: That is not "resetting" the RB market 😂 It definitely does. 1 4 1 Quote
appoo Posted 3 hours ago Posted 3 hours ago Just now, Buffalo_Stampede said: It definitely does. Ain't no other Saquon Barkley's out there. I love Cook but he's probably two tiers below Barkley 6 2 Quote
Magox Posted 3 hours ago Posted 3 hours ago I made this case multiple times that Running backs are undervalued and you will see those valuations increased. Many disagreed. They were wrong. 2 2 1 1 1 Quote
Buffalo_Stampede Posted 2 hours ago Author Posted 2 hours ago Just now, appoo said: Ain't no other Saquon Barkley's out there. I love Cook but he's probably two tiers below Barkley $15 million is a lot less than $20 million. 1 Quote
Magox Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago 4 minutes ago, ColoradoBills said: I know this a touchy subject with Bills fans, but I'm OK giving Cook $12.5M AAV which makes him the 4th highest in the league. I wouldn't do anything more than that. Cook along with players like Spencer Brown and Shakir need to have their cap pushed out to make room for a 3-4 year run with Josh. I used to think he was going to get around $12m. Now I think it will be closer to $14m 1 Quote
FireChans Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago I think the Eagles are gonna make a player trade. Quote
Magox Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago Just now, Buffalo_Stampede said: $15 million is a lot less than $20 million. $20.6m to be exact 1 Quote
SCBills Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago (edited) Cook just changed his pinned post to 20M And no, this doesn't make it more sensical for us to pay a smaller, more slender, RB that can't play 3 downs anything more than 10-12M per year (and even that I wouldn't do, but I'm sure Beane would) Edited 2 hours ago by SCBills 1 Quote
TheBeaneBandit Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago 1 minute ago, Magox said: I made this case multiple times that Running backs are undervalued and you will see those valuations increased. Many disagreed. They were wrong. There's a legendary movie quote in there somewhere 😆. Well done. 2 Quote
Buffalo_Stampede Posted 2 hours ago Author Posted 2 hours ago Just now, Magox said: I used to think he was going to get around $12m. Now I think it will be closer to $14m His value is somewhere around 4-5% of the cap. $14 million is probably the right answer. 1 Quote
Magox Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago Just now, Buffalo_Stampede said: His value is somewhere around 4-5% of the cap. $14 million is probably the right answer. And with cap inflation and how contracts are valued it will never reach 4%. It will be closer to 2-3% the first 3 years if he were to be extended Quote
appoo Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago Just now, Process said: Lol BYE No one is going to give him $15M in the open market. Unless it's a team that;s not contending this year, has Cap to burn, and front load him now so he's got a smaller cap hit when they think they can contend 1 Quote
FireChans Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago 4 minutes ago, Magox said: I made this case multiple times that Running backs are undervalued and you will see those valuations increased. Many disagreed. They were wrong. Using your “extend Rousseau” logic, how does this change Barkley’s percentage of the cap? Quote
ColoradoBills Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago 2 minutes ago, Magox said: I used to think he was going to get around $12m. Now I think it will be closer to $14m It is a volatile subject. I still think for the Bills POV it's $12.5M max. The whole thing ends up how Cook reacts IF Beane doesn't sign him before camp. I don't see a trade in the making right now. Quote
SoonerBillsFan Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago 3 minutes ago, SCBills said: Cook just changed his pinned post to 20M And no, this doesn't make it more sensical for us to pay a smaller, more slender, RB that can't play 3 downs anything more than 10-12M per year (and even that I wouldn't do, but I'm sure Beane would) Yeah, package him as partofa trade. 2 2 Quote
Florida Bills Fanatic Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago There are James Cook equivalents in the draft almost every year. There are no equivalents for Barkley currently in the league nor in the draft this year. Paying Barkley money to lesser players is a fools errand. As much as I like James Cook, the Bills should either sign him to a reasonable contract or tag him for 2026 and draft his replacement. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.