Buffalo Barbarian Posted 5 hours ago Posted 5 hours ago 14 minutes ago, BillsFanForever19 said: He went 64th and we should have took him at 9? Sure, with the benefit of hindsight. Without it, Metcalf at 9 was insane take. Wasnt for me Quote
BillsFanForever19 Posted 5 hours ago Posted 5 hours ago 6 minutes ago, Buffalo Barbarian said: Wasnt for me Then you must be the type of guy who looks at a player who looks good at the Combine and thinks "Top 10 Pick!". He was a complete projection. He played a total of 21 games in college. Had one season where he had 646 yards and another where he had 569 yards. Great physical traits and of course ended up being a stud. But he was the epitome of boom/bust. He wasn't a Top 10 Pick. Quote
Buffalo Barbarian Posted 5 hours ago Posted 5 hours ago 5 minutes ago, BillsFanForever19 said: Then you must be the type of guy who looks at a player who looks good at the Combine and thinks "Top 10 Pick!". He was a complete projection. He played a total of 21 games in college. Had one season where he had 646 yards and another where he had 569 yards. Great physical traits and of course ended up being a stud. But he was the epitome of boom/bust. He wasn't a Top 10 Pick. No , i watched college football and saw athletic domination Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.