KRC Posted June 29, 2005 Posted June 29, 2005 Gee, where is OUR enemy on that list? Al Qaeda? 370903[/snapback] Funny, I didn't know that AQ was the only terrorist organization we should be concerned with in the GWOT. Clinton put Iraq on the State Sponsors of Terrorism list. The UN specifically mentioned them in the countless resolutions after the cease-fire agreement. Iraq was to give up all ties to terrorist activities. They did not and the UN specifically mentioned that they did not give up those activities, violating the cease-fire agreement.
KRC Posted June 29, 2005 Posted June 29, 2005 The fact is, he didn't have WMD and was not a threat. 370919[/snapback] First, you were talking about terrorism. Now you are talking about WMD. I know it is difficult to stay on topic when you are just repeating talking points, but please make some semblence of an effort. Thank you.
Reuben Gant Posted June 29, 2005 Posted June 29, 2005 Everyone please read this, I'm begging you. http://intelligence.senate.gov/iraqreport2.pdf
Alaska Darin Posted June 29, 2005 Posted June 29, 2005 Everyone please read this, I'm begging you.http://intelligence.senate.gov/iraqreport2.pdf 370953[/snapback] Sorry, man. It's 521 pages and contains the words "Senate" and "intelligence" together.
Gavin in Va Beach Posted June 29, 2005 Posted June 29, 2005 Sorry, man. It's 521 pages and contains the words "Senate" and "intelligence" together. 370961[/snapback] Another oxymoron...
SilverNRed Posted June 29, 2005 Posted June 29, 2005 At least you can light a furby on fire when it pisses you off. 370916[/snapback] Or when it doesn't. Any time is a good time to light a Furby on fire. Then again, I'm the guy who briefly considering killing a cat as part of a comprehensive revenge plan against an ex-girlfriend.
Alaska Darin Posted June 29, 2005 Posted June 29, 2005 Or when it doesn't. Any time is a good time to light a Furby on fire. Then again, I'm the guy who briefly considering killing a cat as part of a comprehensive revenge plan against an ex-girlfriend. 370971[/snapback] Nothing wrong with that, really.
Ghost of BiB Posted June 29, 2005 Posted June 29, 2005 The DCCI report is basically an indictment of the Intelligence analysis system, most specifically towards the CIA. It, in effect says no one was being provided decent information.
Crap Throwing Monkey Posted June 29, 2005 Posted June 29, 2005 The fact is, he didn't have WMD and was not a threat. 370919[/snapback] Reading this, I can't shake the suspicion that you're also one of those morons who was crying "But we gave Saddam WMDs!"
ExiledInIllinois Posted June 29, 2005 Posted June 29, 2005 The DCCI report is basically an indictment of the Intelligence analysis system, most specifically towards the CIA. It, in effect says no one was being provided decent information. 370978[/snapback] Including you?
Buckey Posted June 29, 2005 Posted June 29, 2005 Funny, I didn't know that AQ was the only terrorist organization we should be concerned with in the GWOT. Clinton put Iraq on the State Sponsors of Terrorism list. The UN specifically mentioned them in the countless resolutions after the cease-fire agreement. Iraq was to give up all ties to terrorist activities. They did not and the UN specifically mentioned that they did not give up those activities, violating the cease-fire agreement. 370934[/snapback] Your post all relates to Israel and the Palestinians. Why are you tying it into the USA and the terrosists who attacked us?
Alaska Darin Posted June 29, 2005 Posted June 29, 2005 Your post all relates to Israel and the Palestinians. Why are you tying it into the USA and the terrosists who attacked us? 371007[/snapback] GLOBAL WAR ON TERRORISM. Pinhead.
Buckey Posted June 29, 2005 Posted June 29, 2005 First, you were talking about terrorism. Now you are talking about WMD. So you are saying the two are not connected? Exactly my point.
Buckey Posted June 29, 2005 Posted June 29, 2005 GLOBAL WAR ON TERRORISM. Pinhead. 371008[/snapback] Then let Israel take care of their part of the globe... and THEIR enemies, we'll take care of ours. Oh wait, it's political... ok forget it.
BillsFanNC Posted June 29, 2005 Posted June 29, 2005 Then let Israel take care of their part of the globe... and THEIR enemies, we'll take care of ours. Oh wait, it's political... ok forget it. 371019[/snapback] BF is that you?
SilverNRed Posted June 29, 2005 Posted June 29, 2005 Then let Israel take care of their part of the globe... and THEIR enemies, we'll take care of ours. Oh wait, it's political... ok forget it. 371019[/snapback]
Alaska Darin Posted June 29, 2005 Posted June 29, 2005 Then let Israel take care of their part of the globe... and THEIR enemies, we'll take care of ours. Oh wait, it's political... ok forget it. 371019[/snapback] Yeah, it's always a good idea to ignore bad people doing bad things. How's your buddy Neville Chamberlain doing? Learn history.
Alaska Darin Posted June 29, 2005 Posted June 29, 2005 So you are saying the two are not connected? Exactly my point. 371014[/snapback] Seriously, is it so hard to reply to a message or are you really as dim as the character you're playing?
Crap Throwing Monkey Posted June 29, 2005 Posted June 29, 2005 Your post all relates to Israel and the Palestinians. Why are you tying it into the USA and the terrosists who attacked us? 371007[/snapback] What the hell? Ladies and Gentelemen, I present Buckey, the world's only living brain donor...
SilverNRed Posted June 29, 2005 Posted June 29, 2005 Yeah, it's always a good idea to ignore bad people doing bad things. How's your buddy Neville Chamberlain doing? 371037[/snapback] That's not fair, AD. There's about a zero in ten chance that he knows who Neville Chamberlain is.
Recommended Posts