Virgil Posted 19 hours ago Posted 19 hours ago (edited) If he's healthy now, I'd bring him back. He was solid depth. Edited 19 hours ago by Virgil 9 4 Quote
JP51 Posted 19 hours ago Posted 19 hours ago 1 minute ago, Virgil said: If he's healthy now, I'd bring him back. He was solid depth. Not against this at the right price 2 2 Quote
MiracleAtRich1393 Posted 19 hours ago Posted 19 hours ago 2 minutes ago, JP51 said: Not against this at the right price Vet minimum, non-guaranteed? Pick him up!! 2 4 Quote
GunnerBill Posted 19 hours ago Posted 19 hours ago 6 minutes ago, Virgil said: If he's healthy now, I'd bring him back. He was solid depth. Yea me too. Quote
FireChans Posted 19 hours ago Posted 19 hours ago 6 minutes ago, Virgil said: If he's healthy now, I'd bring him back. He was solid depth. You could squint your eyes, pay Benford, sign DJ and let the board come to you at CB in April. I’m all for it. Clearly a guy who benefitted from McD and his scheme but that’s okay. 7 2 1 Quote
gonzo1105 Posted 19 hours ago Posted 19 hours ago I think they’re going more to man so I don’t think it’s going to happen 1 2 Quote
GunnerBill Posted 19 hours ago Posted 19 hours ago 1 minute ago, FireChans said: You could squint your eyes, pay Benford, sign DJ and let the board come to you at CB in April. I’m all for it. Clearly a guy who benefitted from McD and his scheme but that’s okay. Yea that's my take. It stops you having to force it. 1 Quote
Simon Posted 19 hours ago Posted 19 hours ago 1 minute ago, gonzo1105 said: I think they’re going more to man so I don’t think it’s going to happen That's very very possible, but it might not matter as much. Jackson is a bit undersized but he's a legit gamer who's shown some ability to play physical, aggressive man in short areas. He'd certainly be a liability against faster receivers, but knowing McDermott, just because they want to play more man doesn't mean they're going to scheme it where chunk players are more available to offenses. He's risk-averse enough in that regard that Jackson might still be a good fit here at the right price. 2 Quote
Magox Posted 19 hours ago Posted 19 hours ago He is a decent man corner and played solid football with the Bills. Personally, I'd hope for someone better in FA but you could make it work as long as their is decent money spent for other positions. Quote
Mr. WEO Posted 19 hours ago Posted 19 hours ago Is it possible to only have backup CBs on a roster? 5 1 Quote
transient Posted 19 hours ago Posted 19 hours ago Here we go again with the former Panthers... 1 8 1 1 Quote
MiracleAtRich1393 Posted 19 hours ago Posted 19 hours ago 25 minutes ago, FireChans said: You could squint your eyes, pay Benford, sign DJ and let the board come to you at CB in April. I’m all for it. Clearly a guy who benefitted from McD and his scheme but that’s okay. Day 3 CB's FTW 1 Quote
FireChans Posted 19 hours ago Posted 19 hours ago 31 minutes ago, GunnerBill said: Yea that's my take. It stops you having to force it. Knowing how this staff values system familiarity, Jackson may have the best value-price point. He may not be the best CB on the market, but he’s probably the best CB we can get in our system for a super modest deal. 1 2 Quote
FireChans Posted 19 hours ago Posted 19 hours ago 29 minutes ago, Magox said: He is a decent man corner and played solid football with the Bills. Personally, I'd hope for someone better in FA but you could make it work as long as their is decent money spent for other positions. Who do you like that’s better in FA and at what price. Quote
First Round Bust Posted 19 hours ago Posted 19 hours ago scenario - trade Elam to a man intensive D like the Browns for a 6th next year or 7th this year just to dump the salary and then consider a vet min offer to D Jackson as backup with incentives for the amount of playing time in the event of injury to a starter..perhaps... 2 Quote
Sweats Posted 19 hours ago Posted 19 hours ago If we brought him in, i can't say i'd be against it. 1 Quote
FireChans Posted 19 hours ago Posted 19 hours ago 1 minute ago, First Round Bust said: scenario - trade Elam to a man intensive D like the Browns for a 6th next year or 7th this year just to dump the salary and then consider a vet min offer to D Jackson as backup with incentives for the amount of playing time in the event of injury to a starter..perhaps... Elam is getting a 7th round pick swap at this point at best. He is approaching negative value now. If you wanted anything substantial for him, he needed to be traded 2 years ago. 1 1 2 Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.