JaCrispy Posted February 21 Posted February 21 11 hours ago, SectionC3 said: Solid economy and no wars required saving, eh? What corruption, specifically, do you speak of? Have you been following the story about the Social Security Department- and how millions of people as old as 160 years old are receiving payments? 1
4th&long Posted February 21 Posted February 21 1 minute ago, JaCrispy said: Have you been following the story about the Social Security Department- and how millions of people as old as 160 years old are receiving payments? 😂You feel for that? Tell us you are stupid without telling us you are stupid. 🤣 Just like the $50 mil in condoms for Gaza? You bought that ***** too.
JaCrispy Posted February 21 Posted February 21 1 minute ago, 4th&long said: 😂You feel for that? Tell us you are stupid without telling us you are stupid. 🤣 Just like the $50 mil in condoms for Gaza? You bought that ***** too. Of course, there is ZERO corruption in our government- everything is on the up and up…Just like how half of the $300 billion dollars to Ukraine can’t be accounted for…😉 You can lead a horse to water, but you can’t make him drink…
4th&long Posted February 21 Posted February 21 14 minutes ago, JaCrispy said: Of course, there is ZERO corruption in our government- everything is on the up and up…Just like how half of the $300 billion dollars to Ukraine can’t be accounted for…😉 You can lead a horse to water, but you can’t make him drink… Fake news.
Roundybout Posted February 21 Author Posted February 21 1 hour ago, JaCrispy said: Of course, there is ZERO corruption in our government- everything is on the up and up…Just like how half of the $300 billion dollars to Ukraine can’t be accounted for…😉 You can lead a horse to water, but you can’t make him drink… Motte and Bailey fallacy
nedboy7 Posted February 21 Posted February 21 12 hours ago, BillsFanNC said: ⬆️ Hoax Trump trolling efforts always a 🎯 Why does a president need to troll the country he works for? WTF kind of reasoning is that? I think I know. You have no other way of rationalizing this moron. 1
JaCrispy Posted February 21 Posted February 21 (edited) 1 hour ago, 4th&long said: Fake news. Any thoughts on the Pentagon not being able to pass several audits that last decade? Do you feel there is any fraud and corruption in the government? Edited February 21 by JaCrispy
CoudyBills Posted February 21 Posted February 21 On 2/19/2025 at 4:20 PM, Trump_is_Mentally_fit said: That's what you voted for, the childish nonsense, right? He likes scaring people. And a lot of people are scared about this stupid POS, I mean he alredy violently tried undoing one election He has been talking about a third term openly You are mentally unfit, and a *****
Trump_is_Mentally_fit Posted February 21 Posted February 21 (edited) 1 hour ago, CoudyBills said: You are mentally unfit, and a ***** But you are MAGA, a lower life form Sub human Edited February 21 by Trump_is_Mentally_fit
SectionC3 Posted February 21 Posted February 21 4 hours ago, JaCrispy said: Have you been following the story about the Social Security Department- and how millions of people as old as 160 years old are receiving payments? The one that Martin O’Malley and various funeral directors debunked? 1
reddogblitz Posted February 21 Posted February 21 (edited) 4 hours ago, JaCrispy said: Have you been following the story about the Social Security Department- and how millions of people as old as 160 years old are receiving payments? Come on Ja. You're a little behind. The reason Musk thought that is cuz he and Big Balls don't do COBOL. Quote Part of the confusion comes from Social Security’s software system based on the COBOL programming language, which has a lack of date type. This means that some entries with missing or incomplete birthdates will default to a reference point of more than 150 years ago. The news organization WIRED first reported on the use of COBOL programming language at the Social Security Administration. Additionally, a series of reports from the Social Security Administration’s inspector general in March 2023 and July 2024 state that the agency has not established a new system to properly annotate death information in its database, which included roughly 18.9 million Social Security numbers of people born in 1920 or earlier but were not marked as deceased. This does not mean, however, that these individuals were receiving benefits. The agency decided not to update the database because of the cost to do so, which would run upward of $9 million. https://apnews.com/article/social-security-payments-deceased-false-claims-doge-ed2885f5769f368853ac3615b4852cf7 Edited February 21 by reddogblitz 1
Recommended Posts