Don Otreply Posted Tuesday at 04:42 AM Posted Tuesday at 04:42 AM 3 hours ago, Augie said: He is self-admitted or I wouldn’t have ventured there. I mean, I’ve never had anybody crap on my desk, but I don’t have a lot of friends either. Maybe there is a middle ground? 🤷♂️ I thought your comment was humorous, it made me chuckle to myself, 👍 Quote
Thrivefourfive Posted Tuesday at 07:43 AM Posted Tuesday at 07:43 AM 16 hours ago, Mr. WEO said: Rodney Peete was really bad....he can't be on this list lol Confused him with Andre Ware. Simple mistake. Quote
Sweats Posted Tuesday at 11:37 AM Author Posted Tuesday at 11:37 AM Look at the basic formula.........if you have a competent QB, RB, WR (the O trifecta), then you have the basics of being competitive. Quote
Mr. WEO Posted Tuesday at 12:28 PM Posted Tuesday at 12:28 PM 4 hours ago, Thrivefourfive said: Confused him with Andre Ware. Simple mistake. Ware would be Nate Peterman to Peete's Tom Brady Quote
GunnerBill Posted Tuesday at 12:28 PM Posted Tuesday at 12:28 PM 19 hours ago, Matt_In_NH said: Yeah I think the Pats are a counter example.....they had various good players but no "big three". in fact Wes Welker never won a SB. And Ridley only won one, in his final year there by which time he was basically a backup. He was never better than average in any case. I can't comment on New England's first dynasty - the 2001, 2003, 2004 team, but their second dynasty - the 2014, 2016, 2018 team - their three most important offensive skill players were Brady, Edelman and Gronk. Quote
Mr. WEO Posted Tuesday at 12:34 PM Posted Tuesday at 12:34 PM 51 minutes ago, Sweats said: Look at the basic formula.........if you have a competent QB, RB, WR (the O trifecta), then you have the basics of being competitive. Rodgers, Hall, Wilson Prescott, Dowdle, Lamb Quote
Matt_In_NH Posted Tuesday at 02:36 PM Posted Tuesday at 02:36 PM 2 hours ago, GunnerBill said: And Ridley only won one, in his final year there by which time he was basically a backup. He was never better than average in any case. I can't comment on New England's first dynasty - the 2001, 2003, 2004 team, but their second dynasty - the 2014, 2016, 2018 team - their three most important offensive skill players were Brady, Edelman and Gronk. Agreed. Gronk was special....Edelman was a great player with lots of clutch plays...I would argue Shakir is similar but the Bills have no Gronk. Quote
reddogblitz Posted yesterday at 05:09 AM Posted yesterday at 05:09 AM For Dallas I prefer to think of Staubach, Dorsett, Pearson Quote
GASabresIUFan Posted yesterday at 07:02 AM Posted yesterday at 07:02 AM For the Bills Kemp, Gilcrest, Dubenion Kelly, Thomas, Reed Allen, Cook, Shakir (so far) Quote
JP51 Posted 21 hours ago Posted 21 hours ago On 2/17/2025 at 10:41 AM, Sweats said: Ok, maybe not Peete, however, Mitchell threw for an average of 3,000 yards/season........he might be a better comparable than Peete. Yeah I was going Mitchell Carter Sanders... if we are taking Goff out of the equation Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.