AlBUNDY4TDS Posted February 14 Posted February 14 23 minutes ago, Roundybout said: No. Show me the road map before you make these cuts. No.
Wacka Posted February 14 Posted February 14 But "we have to pass the bill to see what's in it" was perfectly fine with the Libs. 1 1 2
sherpa Posted February 14 Posted February 14 24 minutes ago, Trump_is_Mentally_fit said: You know what it means. Playing dumb, love it No I don't. Just like I find no logic, knowledge, competency, informed view or anything else in your grossly political only offerings. You provide nothing, and you know nothing. You are a simple political fire hose who offers no information or reasonable perspective. 2 2 1
SoonerBillsFan Posted February 14 Posted February 14 1 hour ago, Roundybout said: The simple solution here is for Hochul to step up and remove Adams from office. Hochul is facing her own legal issues right now
The Frankish Reich Posted February 14 Posted February 14 (edited) So ... still no motion to dismiss the Adams indictment. Pam Bondi may need to sign it herself. Whoever signs it is gonna face an interesting set of questions from the judge.... It'll be dismissed, but not before a hearing where some "fool or coward" (the language used in the resignation letter from a different AUSA) falls on his/her sword for Donnie. Edited February 14 by The Frankish Reich
4th&long Posted February 14 Posted February 14 This country is *****en corrupt. It was bad before it's even worse under trump. If I was a foreign country there is no way I would trust the united States. 1
njbuff Posted February 14 Posted February 14 5 minutes ago, 4th&long said: This country is *****en corrupt. It was bad before it's even worse under trump. If I was a foreign country there is no way I would trust the united States. Quit whining, you p$ssy.
4th&long Posted February 15 Posted February 15 24 minutes ago, njbuff said: Quit whining, you p$ssy. ***** you scum.
Joe Ferguson forever Posted February 15 Posted February 15 5 hours ago, sherpa said: No I don't. Just like I find no logic, knowledge, competency, informed view or anything else in your grossly political only offerings. You provide nothing, and you know nothing. You are a simple political fire hose who offers no information or reasonable perspective. c'mon, you got the gist...but read the most recent federal prosecutor's words to his boss at Justice. That should provide some clarity "In short, the first justification for the motion -- that [former U.S. Attorney] Damian Williams's role in the case somehow tainted a valid indictment supported by ample evidence, and pursued under different U.S. attorneys is so weak as to be transparently pretextual," Scotten wrote. "The second justification is worse. No system of ordered liberty can allow the Government to use the carrot of dismissing charges, or the stick of threatening to bring them again, to induce an elected official to support its policy objectives," he added. Scotten, an Army veteran who served in Iraq and clerked under Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts and Brett Kavanaugh before he was appointed to the Supreme Court, chastised the president and the administration. "I can even understand how a Chief Executive whose background is in business and politics might see the contemplated dismissal-with-leverage as a good, if distasteful, deal," he wrote. "If no lawyer within earshot of the President is willing to give him that advice, then I expect you will eventually find someone who is enough of a fool, or enough of a coward, to file your motion. But it was never going to be me," he added. Just admit it, you're a maga.
All_Pro_Bills Posted February 15 Posted February 15 5 hours ago, The Frankish Reich said: Come on. This is the Mayor of the largest city in the country. It is an extremely well documented indictment in a public corruption case. As everyone knows, Adams is a Democrat (maybe not anymore, but that's for purely selfish reasons). The prosecution was set up by a Democratic administration. Trump could've just preemptively pardoned him, but then he'd have no leverage over him. So he did what prosecutors do when they want to have leverage over, say, a "cooperating witness"/informant - he directed the Acting US Attorney to dismiss "without prejudice," meaning they could fire up the charges again if Adams doesn't play ball with them. I've largely avoided the so-called discussion of most of Trump's law-stretching/law-breaking actions over these first few weeks. But he always comes up with a new and even more outrageous one. This one is it. Disgusting. The Feds leaned on Adams when he started gripping about the administration's immigrant policies and the negative impact on NYC. So they fired the first shot. So he sided with Trump. That's how politics works. Now they can complain all they want. Tough shitskyes.
njbuff Posted February 15 Posted February 15 37 minutes ago, 4th&long said: ***** you scum. Kiss my ass, wuss.
SectionC3 Posted February 15 Posted February 15 1 hour ago, njbuff said: Kiss my ass, wuss. Looks like we have another internet tough guy here. I bet you get all the chicks telling them about how tough you are on the internet and all of the owning of the lives that you do. Attitudes like that are why guys like you make their living on late night scrap and jelly rollers. You’re so tough!
Joe Ferguson forever Posted February 15 Posted February 15 (edited) 3 hours ago, All_Pro_Bills said: The Feds leaned on Adams when he started gripping about the administration's immigrant policies and the negative impact on NYC. So they fired the first shot. So he sided with Trump. That's how politics works. Now they can complain all they want. Tough shitskyes. yes, rule of law people, magas are...srick to your lack of principles. It suits you. Edited February 15 by Joe Ferguson forever
sherpa Posted February 15 Posted February 15 10 hours ago, Joe Ferguson forever said: Just admit it, you're a maga. Idiotic. This is the result of seeing the world as if looking through a telescope. People with a problematic political focus look at others as if they all have that issue. I don't. I don't like Trump, but I can see some of his views that make a good deal of sense, and I'm not in the "politics first" viewpoint group, as some clearly are. Capiche? Prolly not.
4th&long Posted February 15 Posted February 15 11 hours ago, njbuff said: Kiss my ass, wuss. FU ck you bi tch.
JDHillFan Posted February 15 Posted February 15 2 minutes ago, 4th&long said: FU ck you bi tch. 10 hours ago, SectionC3 said: Looks like we have another internet tough guy here. I bet you get all the chicks telling them about how tough you are on the internet and all of the owning of the lives that you do. Attitudes like that are why guys like you make their living on late night scrap and jelly rollers. You’re so tough!
BillsFanNC Posted February 15 Posted February 15 Let's go back to the infamous Biden quid pro quo that he laid out on camera for the world to see and highlight two things. 1. The 1 billion in loan guarantees? Those were USAID funds. 2. According to Biden, or if the Ukrainians chose to call him, Obama, the President/VP had the absolute authority to cancel the loans if the Ukranians didn't do what they were told. Receipts: 1
Joe Ferguson forever Posted February 15 Posted February 15 (edited) 3 hours ago, sherpa said: Idiotic. This is the result of seeing the world as if looking through a telescope. People with a problematic political focus look at others as if they all have that issue. I don't. I don't like Trump, but I can see some of his views that make a good deal of sense, and I'm not in the "politics first" viewpoint group, as some clearly are. Capiche? Prolly not. which maga policies do you oppose? i don't recall seeing one here. oh, and what do you think of the letter except from a NY fed prosecutor to the acting head of justice? did that change your opinion at all? Or are you just no longer interested in the topic? Edited February 15 by Joe Ferguson forever
Roundybout Posted February 15 Author Posted February 15 20 hours ago, Wacka said: But "we have to pass the bill to see what's in it" was perfectly fine with the Libs. Non sequitur. do ANY of you morons know how to come up with a coherent argument? 20 hours ago, AlBUNDY4TDS said: No. Then it’s not policy, it’s stupidity.
Recommended Posts