Special K Posted 7 hours ago Posted 7 hours ago (edited) With all the talk of the Eagles strong D-line, the other factor that contributed to the Eagles Defensive dominance of the Chiefs was the lockdown CB play from Slay and Mitchell. The Lockdown version of Tre White pre-injury, coupled with Benford as a future CB1 playing as a CB2 would have allowed the Bills to lockdown the Chiefs WR's in the same manner as the Eagles did on Sunday. Obviously the Bills pass rush is nothing like Philly, but I really would have liked the chance to see if a dominant White and Benford combo could have been the difference to get past the Chiefs. Edited 6 hours ago by Special K Quote
Stenbar Posted 7 hours ago Posted 7 hours ago Bad playcalling that gave up a fg with 13 seconds. Then it was V. Millers knee injury, and Milano's injury. We overcame Tre Whites injury pretty easy. Imo. 1 1 1 Quote
Buffalo_Stampede Posted 7 hours ago Posted 7 hours ago There’s been so much wasted cap space on defense due to injuries and poor signings. Some wasted high picks as well. 3 1 2 Quote
Simon Posted 7 hours ago Posted 7 hours ago [This is an automated response] As a courtesy to the other board members, please use more descriptive topic titles. A better title will help the community find information faster and make your topic more likely to be read. The topic starter can edit the topic title line to make it more appropriate. Thank you. Quote
GunnerBill Posted 5 hours ago Posted 5 hours ago I broadly agree with the premise. In 2021, the year they lost Tre on Thanksgiving, the Bills defense was: 1st in the NFL in yards 1st in points 1st in 3rd down % 1st in points per drive That D had a prime age elite corner for 2/3s of the season in White (26) and then Milano (27), Johnson (24), Hyde (30) and Poyer (29) fully healthy and in their peak performance window. Their rankings on defense have gradually worsened as that talent pool has suffered serious injuries (to White, Hyde and Milano) and aged out (Hyde and Poyer). 2022: 2nd in points 6th in yards 7th in 3rd down % 5th in points per drive 2023: 4th in points 9th in yards 19th in 3rd down % 7th in points per drive 2024: 11th in points 17th in yards 29th in 3rd down % 18th in points per drive I am on record as saying when Frazier stepped away that they would get worse on defense, and there was definitely an impact in that on what happened in 2023 and 2024, but the reality is the defensive performance has declined as the talent pool on defense has declined. They were at a point in 2022 pre-Tre's injury where they had one elite player and four very good ones in the back 7. As that has slowly been chipped away at the impact on performance has been clear. Interestingly the 3rd down drop off also coincides with the departure of Edmunds. And while I totally agreed with the decision to let him walk and he lacked splash impact plays... his length definitely helped on 3rd down where opposing QBs would see him sinking in the middle of the field and go away from him. Bernard makes more plays but to QB surveying the defense on 3rd and medium he isn't the same disincentive to throw in the middle of the field. 2 1 Quote
Billzgobowlin Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago I think if that's the issue it was only magnified by the lack of Elam living up to his first-round status. 2 Quote
H2o Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago I agree with much of what GB saying here. The 3rd down % is the most troubling stat imo. Poyer and Hyde also had gone into decline, couple with being the walking wounded. This year they were replaced with Hamlin (not a starter on most teams) and the brittle Taylor Rapp. Daquan is also declining. And yes, I like Bernard and was tired of seeing Edmunds lost on the field also, but Bernard is small out there. Milano's body has begun to fail him. I think it is just a drop off in talent across the board, as well as age catching up with others, and multiple injuries to key players, not just the one that started Tre's exit from Buffalo. So many of these things tied in together and now it's obvious that the defense needs a lot of tweaking to get us where we want to be. Quote
Charles Romes Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago You really can’t overstate what was lost with the white injury in his prime. He’s old now, can’t run anymore coming off two devastating injuries, and STILL was offered a 9 figure contract by one of the smartest organizations in football, then traded to another top organization who also thought he was worth 9 figures, then saw meaningful snaps with the season on the line in the playoffs against the league MVP quarterback. Quote
JohnNord Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago 6 hours ago, Special K said: With all the talk of the Eagles strong D-line, the other factor that contributed to the Eagles Defensive dominance of the Chiefs was the lockdown CB play from Slay and Mitchell. The Lockdown version of Tre White pre-injury, coupled with Benford as a future CB1 playing as a CB2 would have allowed the Bills to lockdown the Chiefs WR's in the same manner as the Eagles did on Sunday. Obviously the Bills pass rush is nothing like Philly, but I really would have liked the chance to see if a dominant White and Benford combo could have been the difference to get past the Chiefs. This can’t be understated enough. Bills re-signed Tre in 2020 believing they had a foundational piece to their defense for the next five seasons. They got about 1.5 years out of that deal. No one wants to hear this but thanks to coaching and the play of vets like Hyde and Poyer, Bills were able to get by with below average cornerbacks. But this was quite a drop off from Tre’s play prior to 2021. Also Tre’s struggle to recover created a massive need at CB ultimately forcing Buffalo to reach for Kaiir Elam - one of Beane’s biggest draft blunders Quote
Buffalo_Stampede Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago Good news is they don’t have much cap space invested on defense moving forward. Bad news is they’re about to spend a lot of cap space and high draft picks on defense again. Hopefully they don’t screw it up. 1 Quote
JerseyBills Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago Von signing as well. If he stays healthy, we have a SB imo Quote
Sweats Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago Oh, come on.........i've been trying to stay off the boards lately and this is what i walk back into?!? Nope......i'm out. Quote
BillsFan2313 Posted 53 minutes ago Posted 53 minutes ago 13 minutes ago, Sweats said: Oh, come on.........i've been trying to stay off the boards lately and this is what i walk back into?!? Nope......i'm out. Quote
Chaos Posted 10 minutes ago Posted 10 minutes ago The following all seem to be true Tre White was awesome The 2021 defense was better than the 2024 defense Not have Tre White is one reason why the 2021 defense was better than then 2024 defense. Calling White's injury "the beginning" seems to conjur the concept that getting worse was inevitible. Three years is a long time in the NFL. Entire teams have been rebuilt from non-playoff teams to championship contenders in that time frame. Here are the 2021 Starters If you look at the front 6 or 7, it seems their 2021 performance was not much different than the 2024 performance. The difference was in the back 4 Hyde, Poyer and White were perfect fits for the scheme the Bills wanted to run. Might have been genius. Might have been luck. In 2021 this scheme was somewhat novel. In 2024, its fairly common and has been studied the committment to the scheme seems fairly absolute the idea that Rapp, Hamlin, Benford are going to provide anything close to White/Hyde/Poyer seems to border on the preposterous. I think the biggest problem is the lack of adaptability. An absolute committment to the scheme, requires a Don Quixote like search for some very specific talent set. Elam did not fit the talent set, (he also may simply not be talented). This was an unforced error by the Bills. I am not a football coach and not a GM. I don't have the exact answers. But it seems to me the Bills should consider some of the following: Evaluate what talents/traits are most commonly available in the draft and free agency. Develop schemes (plural on purpose) that have a deeper pool of players to pull from to fit the schemes Retool the balance between "finding players for the scheme" to "fitting the scheme to the players". Right now it seems to be 99%/1% on finding players for the scheme. This does not seem sustainable. 1 Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.