Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)
5 minutes ago, MasterStrategist said:

KC pulled off a lot of close games, some aided by crucial calls.

 

They aren't as talented as advertised on offense.  

 

Point is on your original post, our defense lacks the talent up front and in secondary to do anything close to this.

 

It's not about Chiefs playing poorly, it's about fielding a talented defense.  Eagles went from basically worst to first, Beane needs to hit on FA/early in draft.


My point remains as I said  originally … they played their best game of the year against the Bills… I appreciate that the Eagles D is leaps and bounds better than the Bills … the Chiefs have still made self inflicted errors  today 

Edited by Aussie Joe
  • Agree 1
Posted
Just now, Roundybout said:


In fairness, Carter was a complete psychopath at Georgia. Maybe we could dial it back.

What's the point of building the culture if it isn't strong enough to bring in someone like Carter and keep him in line?  

Posted
6 minutes ago, Billsfanatic8989 said:

Eh....I don't see this Bills team defeating the Eagles. Maybe Allen doesn't throw a pick six. But our receivers vs that D would be disastrous.

We'd be able to run it.

  • Agree 1
Posted
3 minutes ago, Roundybout said:


To me, he represents a long-standing issue with this roster. Aging, average vets that we keep bringing back because our other options have failed. 
 

I don’t like Jones any more. Oliver is fine. 

Every team has aging, average vets who take up minutes because they know the system.   The salary cap necessitates that.   They arent supposed to be difference makers.   The Bills have a Von Miller, Daquan Jones, Dawson Knox and Matt Milano issue.   Guys who take up way too much of the cap who are either always injured or dont make enough of a difference.   

  • Agree 1
Posted
11 minutes ago, Brand J said:

While they certainly could’ve beaten the Bills, our OL would’ve held up better than KC’s, so the offense wouldn’t have been this bogged down. I think it would’ve been a hard fought game, score at half would be something like 17-13 in either direction.

Playing the if game, our run defense doesn't likely hold Barkley as well as KCs did in that first half. Plus we have started slow all year. I think it's more like 27-10 at this point Eagles.

  • Disagree 1
Posted
Just now, HappyDays said:

 

I just don't know how the voters can watch this game and say it's a QB led victory. Realistically it's the entire Philly defense at all three levels but they have to pick one player.

Therein lies the problem. Too many Eagles defenders are playing good. Cancel one another out. 

Posted
2 minutes ago, Success said:

The Chiefs DID NOT BELONG IN THIS GAME.

 

The Bills & Ravens were both better teams.  This KC team is being completely out-classed. They squeaked by all season, and it has caught up to them.

 

If that's not the dominant narrative after the game, it should be. 

  • Like (+1) 1

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...