Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
39 minutes ago, Roundybout said:


If the firm did a good job obtaining those 400 applications from a diverse pool of people and those 95 were proven best, then fine. 
 

So you clearly think that the FAA as currently constituted is racist since it definitely has valued diversity over ability because they did not take the best scoring candidates if they were white men? 

Posted
15 minutes ago, Orlando Buffalo said:

So you clearly think that the FAA as currently constituted is racist since it definitely has valued diversity over ability because they did not take the best scoring candidates if they were white men? 


It was a poor policy, yes. 

Posted
21 hours ago, Roundybout said:


Your “lowered standards” automatically being with the assumption that anyone not a white male is not fit for the job. 

 

Not that they're 'not fit' (necessarily), but that standards have to be LOWERED in order to shoehorn these DEI hires into the jobs. That may or may not have a bad result. Sometimes, unfortunately, it does. Depends on the profession. Do you want a DEI pilot? A DEI doctor? A DEI lawyer? Or accountant? It depends on how "invested" you are in the results.

 

 

Posted
2 minutes ago, JFKjr said:

 

Not that they're 'not fit' (necessarily), but that standards have to be LOWERED in order to shoehorn these DEI hires into the jobs. That may or may not have a bad result. Sometimes, unfortunately, it does. Depends on the profession. Do you want a DEI pilot? A DEI doctor? A DEI lawyer? Or accountant? It depends on how "invested" you are in the results.

 

 


Bet they fly planes better than your profile name did! 

Posted
29 minutes ago, 4th&long said:

Another near miss today.  Let's fire more at the faa, that should help! Chaos & clown show. 

The clown show is right here.

This has nothing to do with this Administration.

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted

This issue is directly linked to the current administration. With widespread cuts across federal agencies, we're seeing early warning signs of threats to both public safety and national security.

Posted
4 minutes ago, Homelander said:

This issue is directly linked to the current administration. With widespread cuts across federal agencies, we're seeing early warning signs of threats to both public safety and national security.

Not remotely close, but please TDS.

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted
27 minutes ago, Homelander said:

This issue is directly linked to the current administration. With widespread cuts across federal agencies, we're seeing early warning signs of threats to both public safety and national security.

 

Uninformed and idiotic.

  • Agree 3
Posted

By the way, for the sane and rational here, the little Citation was told to hold short of the runway.

That means don't cross until cleared.

They crossed without clearance, which caused the problem.

Nothing to do with anything administration related.

One more stupid attempt at making something political, which it isn't.

Tiresome and goofy, but it is what it is.

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted
1 hour ago, sherpa said:

By the way, for the sane and rational here, the little Citation was told to hold short of the runway.

That means don't cross until cleared.

They crossed without clearance, which caused the problem.

Nothing to do with anything administration related.

One more stupid attempt at making something political, which it isn't.

Tiresome and goofy, but it is what it is.

 

 

Agree with this.

 

It was NOT a systemic issue, but a human issue,

 

The Cessna pilot did not follow the instructions that he had repeated.

 

 

Only a fool would try to make more out of this. . . . . . . . . (as Homey proved so well)

 

 

.

Posted
3 hours ago, sherpa said:

The clown show is right here.

This has nothing to do with this Administration.

You keep telling yourself that. 

×
×
  • Create New...