Goodbye, Consumer Financial Protection Bureau. Crypto scammers rejoice

[Orlando Buffalo]

I am going to kinda of argue out both sides of my mouth here- it is definitely constitutional, and I would have said that before the SC stated it but what is it accomplishing? The big warning is that SBF could happen without it, but he did the biggest fraud of my lifetime right in the spotlight and it allowed it. 

[Homelander]

 

11 hours ago, aristocrat said:

Those people were living paycheck to paycheck before so what’s the difference? You act like the dems actually cared about them and we’re keeping them alive or something. 

 

Are you suggesting people are better served without the CFPB's independent oversight of banks, credit unions, payday lenders, mortgage servicers, foreclosure relief services, debt collectors, and for-profit colleges?

 

Who benefits when Corporate America face less accountability in their dealings with consumers?

 

 

[Orlando Buffalo]

1 minute ago, Homelander said:

 

 

Are you suggesting people are better served without the CFPB's independent oversight of banks, credit unions, payday lenders, mortgage servicers, foreclosure relief services, debt collectors, and for-profit colleges?

 

Who benefits when Corporate America face less accountability in their dealings with consumers?

 

 

Do you literally just copy and paste the Dems talking points? It is amazing how much power Congress delegates that is under their required oversight. BTW all of the things you listed had oversight before the CFPB, so that is not an actual selling point. 

[JDHillFan]

8 minutes ago, Homelander said:

Who benefits when Corporate America face less accountability in their dealings with consumers?

 

You have been acquitting yourself in a very interesting way since arriving on the scene. The way you word it, it sounds like Corporate America benefits. How terrifying. 
 

Now let’s reword your question to address a similar issue:

 

Who benefits when the US government faces less accountability in their dealings with American citizens?

[Coffeesforclosers]

On 2/9/2025 at 12:27 PM, JDHillFan said:

America has weighed in…after three weeks. Let’s see how it looks in three months. Or we can be excitable about eggs, starving the people of the world, or whatever the outrage of the day is. 
 

 

 

Unprecedented?

 

*Googles for 45 seconds*

 

Barack Obama's approval from February 9-15, 2009 was 64%.   George W Bush's approval from February 9-21, 2001 was between 57% and 62%

 

What's "unprecedented"?

[JDHillFan]

2 minutes ago, Coffeesforclosers said:

 

Unprecedented?

 

*Googles for 45 seconds*

 

Barack Obama's approval from February 9-15, 2009 was 64%.   George W Bush's approval from February 9-21, 2001 was between 57% and 62%

 

What's "unprecedented"?

Seems a poor choice of words from Bienvenido. I will contact him/her/them and register your dissatisfaction. My apologies for posting this disinformation. 

[BillsFanNC]

 

[Roundybout]

42 minutes ago, BillsFanNC said:

 

You can be programmed to believe ANYTHING, huh? 
 

CFPB has returned $20 billion to consumers’ pockets since 2011. 
 

The only people who want it gone are crypto scammers and con artists. 

[Homelander]

1 hour ago, JDHillFan said:

Who benefits when the US government faces less accountability in their dealings with American citizens?

 

No one but I'm not paranoid or programmed like you to disrespect the three equal branches of government. While I support a smaller, more efficient government, I oppose having unqualified people who don't understand what they're doing tampering with our digital infrastructure. Having inexperienced people meddling with them is beyond dangerous and stupid.

 

If accountability and transparency is so important, where is the MAGA outrage over Trump removing 17 independent inspectors general? Do you understand the crucial oversight role they're supposed to play?

 

If accountability and transparency is so important, why would House Republicans block efforts to subpoena Elon Musk over DOGE's access to government data?

 

Once again, you choose to believe those who refuse to testify under oath.

 

 

 

 

[Orlando Buffalo]

19 minutes ago, Homelander said:

 

No one but I'm not paranoid or programmed like you to disrespect the three equal branches of government. While I support a smaller, more efficient government, I oppose having unqualified people who don't understand what they're doing tampering with our digital infrastructure. Having inexperienced people meddling with them is beyond dangerous and stupid.

 

If accountability and transparency is so important, where is the MAGA outrage over Trump removing 17 independent inspectors general? Do you understand the crucial oversight role they're supposed to play?

 

If accountability and transparency is so important, why would House Republicans block efforts to subpoena Elon Musk over DOGE's access to government data?

 

Once again, you choose to believe those who refuse to testify under oath.

 

 

 

 

 

You believe that house Democrats are trying to get transparency on what Doge is doing? Please tell me you are in college, because if you are a grown man I have nothing but pity for you 

[JDHillFan]

13 minutes ago, Homelander said:

 

No one but I'm not paranoid or programmed like you to disrespect the three equal branches of government. While I support a smaller, more efficient government, I oppose having unqualified people who don't understand what they're doing tampering with our digital infrastructure. Having inexperienced people meddling with them is beyond dangerous and stupid.

 

If accountability and transparency is so important, where is the MAGA outrage over Trump removing 17 independent inspectors general? Do you understand the crucial oversight role they're supposed to play?

 

If accountability and transparency is so important, why would House Republicans block efforts to subpoena Elon Musk over DOGE's access to government data?

 

Once again, you choose to believe those who refuse to testify under oath.

 

 

 

 

 

No one? No one benefits when the government is unaccountable or scrutiny of it is discouraged? Surely you are joking. 
 

Inspectors General - I do understand the crucial role they are supposed to play as you phrased it. If what we’ve heard so far regarding outrageous expenditures in different agencies is even close to being true, were they actually  performing their crucial role? I think we will probably find out before too long. 
 

Re: Musk subpoena - what purpose at this point would it serve to have him appear before congress? So that dems can play act for the cameras? We all just witnessed the confirmation hearings. It’s a fkng clown show. No point in giving them the chance to bloviate. There’s work to be done. 

[Homelander]

7 minutes ago, JDHillFan said:

No one? No one benefits when the government is unaccountable or scrutiny of it is discouraged? Surely you are joking. 
 

Inspectors General - I do understand the crucial role they are supposed to play as you phrased it. If what we’ve heard so far regarding outrageous expenditures in different agencies is even close to being true, were they actually  performing their crucial role? I think we will probably find out before too long. 
 

Re: Musk subpoena - what purpose at this point would it serve to have him appear before congress? So that dems can play act for the cameras? We all just witnessed the confirmation hearings. It’s a fkng clown show. No point in giving them the chance to bloviate. There’s work to be done. 

 

For someone so vocal on government accountability, why not have Musk testify under oath to the American people about all this fraud and ask the DOJ to pursue charges based on this alleged evidence? What exactly are you afraid of?

 

 

[JDHillFan]

5 minutes ago, Homelander said:

 

For someone so vocal on government accountability, why not have Musk testify under oath to the American people about all this fraud and ask the DOJ to pursue charges based on this alleged evidence? What exactly are you afraid of?

 

 

Afraid of nothing and in due time it seems like a good idea. With democrats/liberals/progressives currently behaving in such an unhinged manner there’s no point. Need evidence of that? Watch Schumer, Waters, and the jackass from Connecticut for two minutes. Or look at your own posts here along with those of Tiberius. Your side is coming undone. 
 

Would be nothing but pinheaded congresspeople screeching all day. Nothing useful would come of it. 

[Homelander]

Just now, JDHillFan said:

Afraid of nothing and in due time it seems like a good idea. With democrats/liberals/progressives currently behaving in such an unhinged manner there’s no point. Need evidence of that? Watch Schumer, Waters, and the jackass from Connecticut for two minutes. Or look at your own posts here along with those of Tiberius. Your side is coming undone. 
 

Would be nothing but pinheaded congresspeople screeching all day. Nothing useful would come of it. 

 

How can you not see the danger in allowing inexperienced individuals to tamper with our digital infrastructure while simply hoping nothing goes wrong?
 

Your stance demonstrates a complete disregard for accountability.

 

 

 

[Homelander]

Anyone else notice a pattern?