Roundybout Posted February 14 Posted February 14 36 minutes ago, BillsFanNC said: And they didn't even give so much as the appearance of transparency. Unless I missed the PCs with Lisa Monaco or Ron Klain answering questions in the oval office next to President Brandon. So, it’s okay that Elon is acting as President because Trump is in the same room as him? That’s bizarre.
AlBUNDY4TDS Posted February 14 Posted February 14 1 minute ago, Roundybout said: So, it’s okay that Elon is acting as President because Trump is in the same room as him? That’s bizarre. Quick question who was running the government the last 4 years? Cause it sure as hell wasn't Biden.
Roundybout Posted February 14 Posted February 14 4 minutes ago, AlBUNDY4TDS said: Quick question who was running the government the last 4 years? Cause it sure as hell wasn't Biden. This has nothing to do with Elon. I find you guilty of deflection and sentence you to a rewatch of Bills/Browns 2009. 1 1
AlBUNDY4TDS Posted February 14 Posted February 14 Just now, Roundybout said: This has nothing to do with Elon. I find you guilty of deflection and sentence you to a rewatch of Bills/Browns 2009. Why does it bother you with Elon and not Biden? Clearly he was not running the country. Your bias is deteriorating you brain.
Roundybout Posted February 14 Posted February 14 Just now, AlBUNDY4TDS said: Why does it bother you with Elon and not Biden? Clearly he was not running the country. Your bias is deteriorating you brain. Because I can look with my own eyeballs right now and see that Elon has far more influence over the nation than any bureaucrat should.
AlBUNDY4TDS Posted February 14 Posted February 14 6 minutes ago, Roundybout said: Because I can look with my own eyeballs right now and see that Elon has far more influence over the nation than any bureaucrat should. You can't be serious.
Roundybout Posted February 14 Posted February 14 3 minutes ago, AlBUNDY4TDS said: You can't be serious. Dude he’s meeting with Modi.
Homelander Posted February 14 Author Posted February 14 5 hours ago, Doc said: No what's embarrassing is you guys can't quit Russia. All because you couldn't handle that Hillary lost and had to glom-onto anything to explain it. And the difference between the Afghanistan war is that was actually our war. But Biden didn't need to withdraw when he did, much less the way he did. Again if Ukraine and Europe end up being cutout of this agreement and neither of them like it, they don't have to accept it and the war can go on. Trump surrendered Afghanistan to the Taliban, rendering subsequent events irrelevant. Whether you believe Donald Trump works for Putin or not, his remarkably swift surrender to Putin's demands is undeniable.
Roundybout Posted February 14 Posted February 14 6 minutes ago, Homelander said: Trump surrendered Afghanistan to the Taliban, rendering subsequent events irrelevant. Whether you believe Donald Trump works for Putin or not, his remarkably swift surrender to Putin's demands is undeniable. And the fact that his initial negotiations have been "Russia gets whatever it wants" ... Or that Hegseth is out there blabbing that the US Navy isn't as strong as China or Russia's (though he may have been very drunk at the time)...
Pokebball Posted February 14 Posted February 14 4 hours ago, Roundybout said: So, it’s okay that Elon is acting as President because Trump is in the same room as him? That’s bizarre. He isn't
Homelander Posted February 15 Author Posted February 15 2 hours ago, Roundybout said: Hegseth is out there blabbing that the US Navy isn't as strong as China or Russia America First, of course. The U.S. Navy could defeat Russia's surface fleet and still have time for lunch. Why are these Fox News hires so subservient to Putin?
Joe Ferguson forever Posted February 15 Posted February 15 So Musk met with Modi in an executive branch building today. The trump was asked whether it was for business or gov't purposes, trump said he assumed it was for business. And maga's everywhere yawned. Is his business in India gonna improve maga's standard of living?
JDHillFan Posted February 15 Posted February 15 Just now, Joe Ferguson forever said: So Musk met with Modi in an executive branch building today. The trump was asked whether it was for business or gov't purposes, trump said he assumed it was for business. And maga's everywhere yawned. Is his business in India gonna improve maga's standard of living? Would it have been better if the bad magas ran screaming into the hallway? The overwrought schoolgirl bit is for your side aka, the losers. Elections have consequences, you know. 1
Doc Posted February 15 Posted February 15 (edited) 6 hours ago, Homelander said: Trump surrendered Afghanistan to the Taliban, rendering subsequent events irrelevant. Whether you believe Donald Trump works for Putin or not, his remarkably swift surrender to Putin's demands is undeniable. There is no end to the war that involves a) Ukraine being allowed to join NATO and b) a return to pre-2014 boundaries. Everyone should know this. Edited February 15 by Doc 1 1
Roundybout Posted February 15 Posted February 15 13 hours ago, aristocrat said: Holy non sequitur Batman
Doc Posted February 15 Posted February 15 (edited) Musk and Trump were interviewed by Hannity. He asked them about people trying to drive a wedge between them by claiming Musk is the real President. They talked about it, which means they know what the Dems are trying to do and are laughing at it. It's not a thing. Time to move on from this Dems. Edited February 15 by Doc
4th&long Posted February 15 Posted February 15 (edited) Now these #######s are trying to hire back the people they fired that keep the nukes safe. You can't make this up. These people will get a nice raise out of this. I wouldn't go back without a nice bonus and double the salary. Edited February 15 by 4th&long
Joe Ferguson forever Posted February 15 Posted February 15 18 hours ago, JDHillFan said: Would it have been better if the bad magas ran screaming into the hallway? The overwrought schoolgirl bit is for your side aka, the losers. Elections have consequences, you know. it would have been better if a powerful unelected official was not doing private business in an official government office, on the back of taxpayers without any potential upside to them. Is that what you voted for? To make Musk richer and more powerful?
Doc Posted February 15 Posted February 15 2 minutes ago, Joe Ferguson forever said: it would have been better if a powerful unelected official was not doing private business in an official government office, on the back of taxpayers without any potential upside to them. Is that what you voted for? To make Musk richer and more powerful? Versus unelected non-powerful people who would definitely be looking for ways to get rich? And I'll say this: if/when the ***** hits the fan, you'll be grateful that Musk is on our side.
Recommended Posts