Trump_is_Mentally_fit Posted February 4 Posted February 4 Don't forget, all this criminality, insanity and chaos will be front and center when Americans vote again. If the mid-terms happen or are not completely fouled up on purpose by the party in charge. I imagine their is going to be a fight after the Dems seize control of House and maybe Senate and all the investigations begin.
JFKjr Posted February 4 Posted February 4 36 minutes ago, Trump_is_Mentally_fit said: Don't forget, all this criminality, insanity and chaos will be front and center when Americans vote again. If the mid-terms happen or are not completely fouled up on purpose by the party in charge. I imagine their is going to be a fight after the Dems seize control of House and maybe Senate and all the investigations begin. Yes I'm looking forward to the Dems doubling down on the DEI. 1
Motorin' Posted February 4 Posted February 4 Just now, JFKjr said: Yes I'm looking forward to the Dems doubling down on the DEI. I can't wait for the media to be forced to cover the story of the Democrats funding the creation of COVID 19 at Wuhan. Should really help put them back on top during the mid-terms. 1 1
Artful Dodger Posted February 4 Posted February 4 After two years of Trump, the Democrats should do well in the midterms. However, that might depend on the quality of their candidates. If they continue down the insane road that they're on now, they're likely to underperform in 2026, just as the Republicans did in 2022, thanks to the terrible quality of Republican candidates that year. Assuming the Democrats win back the House, they'll probably impeach Trump four or five more times before the end of his term just for the hell of it.
JDHillFan Posted February 4 Posted February 4 49 minutes ago, Trump_is_Mentally_fit said: Don't forget, all this criminality, insanity and chaos will be front and center when Americans vote again. If the mid-terms happen or are not completely fouled up on purpose by the party in charge. I imagine their is going to be a fight after the Dems seize control of House and maybe Senate and all the investigations begin. You were 100% wrong on EVERYTHING regarding the most recent election. That said, you seem sober and well-reasoned. I shall trust your analysis of the 2028 election cycle. 1
Trump_is_Mentally_fit Posted February 4 Author Posted February 4 19 minutes ago, JDHillFan said: You were 100% wrong on EVERYTHING regarding the most recent election. That said, you seem sober and well-reasoned. I shall trust your analysis of the 2028 election cycle. I called Trump's win on election night before the polls closed, so I got that right. 1
Trump_is_Mentally_fit Posted February 4 Author Posted February 4 26 minutes ago, Artful Dodger said: After two years of Trump, the Democrats should do well in the midterms. However, that might depend on the quality of their candidates. If they continue down the insane road that they're on now, they're likely to underperform in 2026, just as the Republicans did in 2022, thanks to the terrible quality of Republican candidates that year. Assuming the Democrats win back the House, they'll probably impeach Trump four or five more times before the end of his term just for the hell of it. I'll disagree, I bet Dems run all sorts of queers, gays, bi, whatever, and win anyway. Most centrist people just don't give a sh it who you are doing
JDHillFan Posted February 4 Posted February 4 (edited) 10 hours ago, Trump_is_Mentally_fit said: I'll disagree, I bet Dems run all sorts of queers, gays, bi, whatever, and win anyway. Most centrist people just don't give a sh it who you are doing You are a rabid partisan. Why do you believe you know anything about centrists? when a centrist sees a picture of Mayor Pete chest-feeding, do you think they are more likely to identify with him or less likely? Edited February 5 by JDHillFan Rabid, not rapid. Smh 1
JFKjr Posted February 4 Posted February 4 1 hour ago, Trump_is_Mentally_fit said: I'll disagree, I bet Dems run all sorts of queers, gays, bi, whatever, and win anyway. Most centrist people just don't give a sh it who you are doing That isn't what the opposition to trans issues are about. They're about forcing that ideology on kids in schools, having 'trans' in the opposite bathrooms, trans women playing in women's sports and more.
Artful Dodger Posted February 4 Posted February 4 6 hours ago, Trump_is_Mentally_fit said: I'll disagree, I bet Dems run all sorts of queers, gays, bi, whatever, and win anyway. Most centrist people just don't give a sh it who you are doing True, but they do give sh it when you talk about it constantly and it seems to be your most important issue.
Doc Posted February 4 Posted February 4 6 hours ago, Trump_is_Mentally_fit said: I'll disagree, I bet Dems run all sorts of queers, gays, bi, whatever, and win anyway. Most centrist people just don't give a sh it who you are doing Doubtful, if the last election was any indication. 1
daz28 Posted February 4 Posted February 4 7 hours ago, Motorin' said: I can't wait for the media to be forced to cover the story of the Democrats funding the creation of COVID 19 at Wuhan. Should really help put them back on top during the mid-terms. Extremely misleading. The NIH is very broad, and I'd assume many republicans voted yes on that funding bill.
Motorin' Posted February 4 Posted February 4 31 minutes ago, daz28 said: Extremely misleading. The NIH is very broad, and I'd assume many republicans voted yes on that funding bill. It wasn't NIH. It was USAID.
daz28 Posted February 4 Posted February 4 (edited) 7 minutes ago, Motorin' said: It wasn't NIH. It was USAID. “Dr. Tabak,” asked Rep. Debbie Lesko (R-Ariz.) of the Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic, “did NIH fund gain-of-function research at the Wuhan Institute of Virology through [Manhattan-based nonprofit] EcoHealth [Alliance]?” “It depends on your definition of gain-of-function research,” Tabak answered. “If you’re speaking about the generic term, yes, we did.” Note: there's a bit of gotcha on the semantics here, as well. Politicians are REAL good at that. Edited February 4 by daz28
Motorin' Posted February 4 Posted February 4 (edited) 7 minutes ago, daz28 said: “Dr. Tabak,” asked Rep. Debbie Lesko (R-Ariz.) of the Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic, “did NIH fund gain-of-function research at the Wuhan Institute of Virology through [Manhattan-based nonprofit] EcoHealth [Alliance]?” “It depends on your definition of gain-of-function research,” Tabak answered. “If you’re speaking about the generic term, yes, we did.” Note: there's a bit of gotcha on the semantics here, as well. Politicians are REAL good at that. Yes, they're guilty. This is not something that Congress voted on to fund through NIH. Edited February 4 by Motorin' 1
daz28 Posted February 5 Posted February 5 3 hours ago, Motorin' said: Yes, they're guilty. This is not something that Congress voted on to fund through NIH. There were different grants from all over at that institute. Some cover some things specifically, and others generally. It's probably run just like Washington, where they rob Peter to pay Paul for projects.
SCBills Posted February 25 Posted February 25 (edited) Jon Ossoff is one of the better Democrats in the Senate. He’ll be up in ‘26 and whether he wins or loses really all depends on whether Brian Kemp runs. Edited February 25 by SCBills 1
JFKjr Posted February 25 Posted February 25 On 2/4/2025 at 8:46 PM, daz28 said: There were different grants from all over at that institute. Some cover some things specifically, and others generally. It's probably run just like Washington, where they rob Peter to pay Paul for projects. NIH Used Private Emails To Plot Deceptive Response To Protests of Cruel Experiments On Baby Monkeys
Recommended Posts