Buffalo_Stampede Posted 6 hours ago Posted 6 hours ago (edited) 1 minute ago, Big Blitz said: If Jacksonville wants him Cleveland will have the 2nd and 5th pick. We’re only getting him if he wants to be here. He’s only getting traded to a team he wants to go to. He controls everything. Obviously compensation will have to be fair, there will be multiple teams he okays. Edited 6 hours ago by Buffalo_Stampede 1 3 Quote
BillMafia716ix Posted 6 hours ago Posted 6 hours ago Going to cost at least two 1st rd picks and a player. Quote
SCBills Posted 6 hours ago Posted 6 hours ago 1 minute ago, Big Blitz said: If Jacksonville wants him Cleveland will have the 2nd and 5th pick. We’re only getting him if he wants to be here. Reading his trade request... Cleveland might as well fold up shop for Free Agents if they trade him to Jacksonville. Quote
ExWNYer Posted 6 hours ago Posted 6 hours ago 4 minutes ago, NewEra said: O/U on pages in this thread before he gets traded to the Ravens? I’ll say 250 But WNY has better "deers"! Quote
Kirby Jackson Posted 6 hours ago Posted 6 hours ago 5 minutes ago, Kelly to Allen said: Probably 2 1sts starts the discussion 4 minutes ago, BarleyNY said: Cleveland I don’t necessarily disagree. People may look at Rousseau as a young, Pro Bowlish type of DE. He’s definitely a starter. I don’t see the Bills wanting to pay the $17.5-M - $23M a year it’ll take to keep him. Cleveland COULD look at him as an asset and a suitable starting option. If he develops, it’s a good trade for them. I don’t see him as a negative asset. I feel like this is reasonable. 2 Quote
Trust The Process Posted 6 hours ago Posted 6 hours ago 1 minute ago, BillMafia716ix said: Going to cost at least two 1st rd picks and a player. well worth it 1 Quote
JP51 Posted 6 hours ago Posted 6 hours ago Just now, BarleyNY said: Cleveland will ship him to an NFC team unless an AFC team pays a big premium. Not so sure about that, I do not think they trade him in Division, I think in conference is really eliminating a lot of offers and handicapping yourself on the trade market... besides, Cleveland is not likely to be good until Garrett is in his 30s ... 1 Quote
BarleyNY Posted 6 hours ago Posted 6 hours ago (edited) 2 minutes ago, Kirby Jackson said: I don’t necessarily disagree. People may look at Rousseau as a young, Pro Bowlish type of DE. He’s definitely a starter. I don’t see the Bills wanting to pay the $17.5-M - $23M a year it’ll take to keep him. Cleveland COULD look at him as an asset and a suitable starting option. If he develops, it’s a good trade for them. I don’t see him as a negative asset. I feel like this is reasonable. Other teams will offer more than a late first, a late second and a good, but limited DE who needs a new, large contract. Calling with that offer is the same as calling the Browns and telling them you aren’t interested. Edited 6 hours ago by BarleyNY Quote
Kelly to Allen Posted 6 hours ago Posted 6 hours ago (edited) 4 minutes ago, Kirby Jackson said: I don’t necessarily disagree. People may look at Rousseau as a young, Pro Bowlish type of DE. He’s definitely a starter. I don’t see the Bills wanting to pay the $17.5-M - $23M a year it’ll take to keep him. Cleveland COULD look at him as an asset and a suitable starting option. If he develops, it’s a good trade for them. I don’t see him as a negative asset. I feel like this is reasonable. If they trade Rousseau to get him, if rather trade the inside player like Oliver. Regardless, if they do trade Rousseau to get Garrett, they need an opposite pass rusher similar to be Bennett opposite Bruce Myles Garrett specifically said he wants to go to a contender correct? This is big for us Edited 6 hours ago by Kelly to Allen 1 Quote
Toledo Bill Posted 6 hours ago Posted 6 hours ago Two firsts... Beane whiffs on those anyway. 1 2 3 Quote
Miyagi-Do Karate Posted 6 hours ago Posted 6 hours ago 1) scenario 1: after Bills land him for multiple 1sts and 2nds, thread: “well, worth it. Difference maker that will put us over the top.” 2) scenario 2: after another team land him, thread: ”wow, insane price. Will set them back years. And Garrett is washed anyway. Looks like another Von Miller situation.” 4 2 Quote
Kelly to Allen Posted 6 hours ago Posted 6 hours ago (edited) 1 minute ago, BarleyNY said: Other teams will offer more than a late first, a late second and a good, but limited player who needs a new, large contract. We are offering two number 1s to start. Edited 6 hours ago by Kelly to Allen Quote
ExWNYer Posted 6 hours ago Posted 6 hours ago 2 minutes ago, Brand J said: Garrett, Crosby, or Parsons. One could hope. Micah Parsons wants to stay in Dallas. "The star pass rusher said he'd like to ink a long-term extension before free agency kicks off in March." https://www.nfl.com/news/micah-parsons-hopes-new-contract-with-cowboys-comes-before-free-agency#:~:text=Micah Parsons hopes new contract with Cowboys comes before free agency,-Published: Dec 20&text=The Dallas Cowboys waited until,re willing to give me." Quote
Kelly to Allen Posted 6 hours ago Posted 6 hours ago 6 minutes ago, BillMafia716ix said: Going to cost at least two 1st rd picks and a player. Get it done Quote
78thealltimegreat Posted 6 hours ago Posted 6 hours ago They will want Rousseau and two firsts plus probably like a third next year which seems to be honest not too bad Quote
Brand J Posted 6 hours ago Posted 6 hours ago CLE gets: Rousseau, pick #30, pick #56, 2026 2nd round pick. BUF gets: Garrett, 2025 4th round pick. 4 1 Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.