aristocrat Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago Mack was traded for two firsts a third and a sixth. 1 Quote
3rdand12 Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago 17 minutes ago, Buffalo716 said: I will literally go over the falls if we trade for Garrett I'll broadcast it live and take donations for the hospital bill I will begin the go fund me as soon as the deal is done Go Bills 3 Quote
LEBills Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago Just now, aristocrat said: Mack was traded for two firsts a third and a sixth. Chicago got a second and a conditional fifth back along with Mack. Quote
Mikie2times Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago 2 minutes ago, aristocrat said: Mack was traded for two firsts a third and a sixth. Off a 6-10 year for the Raiders. Honestly, it would probably take two firsts, and two seconds for what our 1's and 2's are worth. 1 Quote
Sojourner Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago 34 minutes ago, aristocrat said: I think you have to take into account that he’s been on terrible teams that play from behind. We win lots of games and other teams throw more to catch up. He’d get more sacks and pressures this way. I thought the same but the stats say a different story. There’s a reason he led the league in total pressures, pass-rush win rate and pass-rush grade. Hence the DPOY talk. His pass rush snaps led the league @ 477… Theres a tweet to back it up: Does he get more pass rush snaps? Probably not. Does he get a better quality of pass rush snaps? Probably. 1 1 1 1 Quote
Lothar Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago I don't think it'll take more than a 1 and a 2. I'd rather see if we can get Crosby if we're giving up multiple firsts. Quote
Buffalo Barbarian Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago Is affordable according to Joe Marino,let's do it. 1 1 Quote
Mark Vader Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago 5 hours ago, Virgil said: A few thoughts on all of this: Do we think the helmet swinging incident makes him a culture fit? I could see that being the type of thing that McD wouldn't want around the locker room. With his contract and being 29 years old, are we sure he has enough good years in the tank to justify paying him. (Von Miller PTSD speaking here) Would Maxx Crosby make more sense, being 2 years younger and more experience and success against Mahomes If the price tag really includes a first round pick, would that really be worth it? To be fair, I realize that Garrett was just recently DPOY and would be amazing on the other side of Groot, as well as the money from Miller coming off the books, but I don't want to see ourselves trap ourselves in another aging bad contract. Your points are valid, it's just that right now I don't give a damn! The Bills need to do something drastic, and a player like Garrett is worth the risk. The Bills should be on the phone asking about Garrett, Maxx Crosby, Dexter Lawrence & Jeffery Simmons. Players who are stuck on teams that are not winning and will not be winning anytime soon. See if they can get just one of those players. Any one of them would help our defense a lot. Draft picks be damned! We have the chance to win a championship now! We can worry about rookie players later. 3 1 1 Quote
Mikie2times Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago 1 minute ago, Sojourner said: I thought the same but the stats say a different story. There’s a reason he led the league in total pressures, pass-rush win rate and pass-rush grade. Hence the DPOY talk. His pass rush snaps led the league @ 477… Theres a tweet to back it up: Does he get more pass rush snaps? Probably not. Does he get a better quality of pass rush snaps? Probably. The bend and agility he shows his out world for a man his size. He's going to be a first ballot HOF player if he even comes close to maintaining this pace for a few more years. I just think what would KC really not want us doing? WR? Meh...I don't think they care about an arms race. DB? Meh....I think they feel good about scheming guys open. Myles Garrett? Yup. No game plan for that. 1 1 Quote
ExWNYer Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago 6 minutes ago, london_bills said: Are these trades ever truly worth it? Only one way to find out... 1 1 Quote
aristocrat Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago 8 minutes ago, LEBills said: Chicago got a second and a conditional fifth back along with Mack. Good call 1 Quote
Sojourner Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago 2 minutes ago, Mikie2times said: The bend and agility he shows his out world for a man his size. He's going to be a first ballot HOF player if he even comes close to maintaining this pace for a few more years. I just think what would KC really not want us doing? WR? Meh...I don't think they care about an arms race. DB? Meh....I think they feel good about scheming guys open. Myles Garrett? Yup. No game plan for that. Splitting hairs if I’m honest in terms of who I’d personally have. But that’s not me making the decision. If the price is the same you probably do Garrett given the history. If the price is less than Crosby it’s a no brainer. Maxx is the feel good story who’s relentlessly making the most of his chances which have put him on par with Garrett without the history of continued high end production. Either is a win for Buffalo and us fans. 🤞🙏🤞 3 Quote
quincy Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago If he was to come aboard we would have the first two picks from the 2017 draft on our 2025 roster assuming Trubisky isn't cut. At a minimum there will be at least 5 Hall of Famers from that draft. Every podcaster seems to want him on their team, realistic or not. 4 Time First Team All-Pro and a true difference maker. Now or never to decide whether you want a player of his caliber and what you are willing to pay in draft capital and contract reworking/extension. Quote
PauleeeWalnuts Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago 8 hours ago, Gregg said: This would be a great start to the offseason if Beane can pull this off. I think back to the Ravens playoff game. The play where Jackson threw the TD which cut the Bills lead to two points. He had what seemed like an eternity to just scan the field and complete the TD pass. If they traded for him I think it would be the entire offseason, not just the start haha He’s going to require a haul 1 Quote
TheWeatherMan Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago 8 hours ago, Miyagi-Do Karate said: what’s the price tag? Anyone have an idea? Two 1st rounders? I would assume something comparable + to what the Bears gave the Raider for Khalil Mack. 18 minutes ago, london_bills said: Are these trades ever truly worth it? No, a 3rd string CB, a TE that can’t catch and a WR that can’t separate > generational game wrecking DE. 1 Quote
97bills Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago 8 hours ago, Big Blitz said: If Jacksonville wants him Cleveland will have the 2nd and 5th pick. We’re only getting him if he wants to be here. Jacksonville isn’t winning no Super Bowl. But sometimes a big bag and playing in Florida, changes ones mine. Quote
AlCowlingsTaxiService Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago 8 hours ago, EmotionallyUnstable said: I’d do my first and some change. If they start ever asking for 2 firsts, I’m out. We need elite blue chip play makers, and we’ve seen how putting all your eggs in one basket can work out for you (Diggs, Von). Because we’ve drafted so many blue chip play makers in the first? 1 Quote
mannc Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago 3 minutes ago, TheWeatherMan said: I would assume something comparable + to what the Bears gave the Raider for Khalil Mack. Garrett is considerably older than Mack was when he was traded to Chicago...and he's probably going to sign a four-year contract with $100 million in guarantees. The Mack trade would seem to represent the absolute most Cleveland could get. 1 Quote
Warriorspikes51 Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago If he’s healthy, this is best player we could possibly acquire we don’t have a true game changing talent on Defense. Myles along with a massive hungry rookie NT and our DL goes from average to top tier 4 Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.