nosejob Posted Sunday at 11:27 PM Posted Sunday at 11:27 PM One thing I've learned about Beane is that you never know what he's gonna do. I could see him maybe doing Trey Hendrickson who is currently on a 1 yr. deal between 19 and 21 mil. I think he would be an easier get on a 2-3 yr. deal and spreading the money out. 17.5. sacks the last 2 yrs. Cincy has been drafting guys (ie. Myles Murphy) and will probably deal. Shouldn't cost high picks. Then he can go get SexyDexy... 1 1 Quote
Warriorspikes51 Posted yesterday at 12:47 AM Posted yesterday at 12:47 AM 1 hour ago, nosejob said: One thing I've learned about Beane is that you never know what he's gonna do. I could see him maybe doing Trey Hendrickson who is currently on a 1 yr. deal between 19 and 21 mil. I think he would be an easier get on a 2-3 yr. deal and spreading the money out. 17.5. sacks the last 2 yrs. Cincy has been drafting guys (ie. Myles Murphy) and will probably deal. Shouldn't cost high picks. Then he can go get SexyDexy... you’re telling me acquiring Trey Hendrickson from an AFC competitor won’t cost high picks? What?? He will go for a 1st + if traded 1 1 Quote
Chicken Boo Posted yesterday at 04:36 PM Posted yesterday at 04:36 PM Kamara to the Chiefs would be a nightmare. 2 1 Quote
Ya Digg? Posted yesterday at 04:47 PM Posted yesterday at 04:47 PM 9 minutes ago, Chicken Boo said: Kamara to the Chiefs would be a nightmare. Kamara to the Chiefs a couple of years ago would've been a nightmare. Don't get me wrong, he would certainly help them out, but his best days are past him 1 Quote
Goin Breakdown Posted yesterday at 04:49 PM Posted yesterday at 04:49 PM 1 minute ago, Ya Digg? said: Kamara to the Chiefs a couple of years ago would've been a nightmare. Don't get me wrong, he would certainly help them out, but his best days are past him Same was said about Henry last year when he went to the ravens. Not saying you're wrong but we never know Quote
SCBills Posted yesterday at 05:09 PM Posted yesterday at 05:09 PM (edited) I'm open to Hendrickson, depending on cost.. which probably means I'm not open to it given what the Bengals would likely want to trade him to us. Adding a couple years to his deal to pair with Rousseau while not giving up a ton could be just what we need but I don't think we'd get him that easily from CIN. As for the Cook, Kincaid, 1st for Parsons deal.. I do that in a second. Davis, Johnson and a 4th Round Pick is "good enough" for what we need at RB. Knox & Davidson is "good enough" for what we need at TE. Rousseau, Epenesa & Solomon is NOT good enough at DE.. and adding Parson to that group for Cook, Kincaid and 1st, immediately takes it from a below average room to an above average (potentially elite) room, while keeping both of our 2nds to add at DT if we want to further build up the DL. And I would have zero issue paying big money to Rousseau if he proves he can be a monster opposite a true 1 EDGE. Pay QB, OL, DL and then constantly draft WR's, RB's, LB's, DB's and Safeties. Edited yesterday at 05:13 PM by SCBills Quote
Chicken Boo Posted yesterday at 05:35 PM Posted yesterday at 05:35 PM 45 minutes ago, Ya Digg? said: Kamara to the Chiefs a couple of years ago would've been a nightmare. Don't get me wrong, he would certainly help them out, but his best days are past him I disagree. He still produced 1493 yards from scrimmage in 14 games on a ***** NO team. 1 Quote
3rdand12 Posted 22 hours ago Posted 22 hours ago 21 hours ago, Warriorspikes51 said: you’re telling me acquiring Trey Hendrickson from an AFC competitor won’t cost high picks? What?? He will go for a 1st + if traded all the ones we want at edge will cost 1st round picks ! Quote
3rdand12 Posted 21 hours ago Posted 21 hours ago 5 hours ago, SCBills said: I'm open to Hendrickson, depending on cost.. which probably means I'm not open to it given what the Bengals would likely want to trade him to us. Adding a couple years to his deal to pair with Rousseau while not giving up a ton could be just what we need but I don't think we'd get him that easily from CIN. As for the Cook, Kincaid, 1st for Parsons deal.. I do that in a second. Davis, Johnson and a 4th Round Pick is "good enough" for what we need at RB. Knox & Davidson is "good enough" for what we need at TE. Rousseau, Epenesa & Solomon is NOT good enough at DE.. and adding Parson to that group for Cook, Kincaid and 1st, immediately takes it from a below average room to an above average (potentially elite) room, while keeping both of our 2nds to add at DT if we want to further build up the DL. And I would have zero issue paying big money to Rousseau if he proves he can be a monster opposite a true 1 EDGE. Pay QB, OL, DL and then constantly draft WR's, RB's, LB's, DB's and Safeties. I sure would like the chance to see Rousseau with a monster on the other side and and Fat Man in the Middle ( fat man is a compliment for 1 tech and or a dude who can play honest nose Tackle on a few plays.) May not have all those luxuries though to assess Gregg's ceiling Parson is not my 1st choice btw unless jerry wants to make it happen. If we cannot a deal Then you have to draft the stud DE early and beast DT asap. McD can do his thing with CB and Safety. FA would also work there Quote
GunnerBill Posted 21 hours ago Posted 21 hours ago (edited) 23 hours ago, Warriorspikes51 said: you’re telling me acquiring Trey Hendrickson from an AFC competitor won’t cost high picks? What?? He will go for a 1st + if traded Hendrickson isn't getting a 1st. If they can't renegotiate his deal they will cut him. Everyone knows that. Cincy doesn't have the leverage. Edited 20 hours ago by GunnerBill Quote
nosejob Posted 21 hours ago Posted 21 hours ago 17 minutes ago, GunnerBill said: Hendrickson is getting a 1st. If they can't renegotiate his deal they will cut him. Everyone knows that. Cincy doesn't have the leverage. I think he has 1 year left between 19 and 21? but less than 3 mil dead cap. Give them pick 30 and AJE. Sign BJ Hill short term as well. 1 Quote
GunnerBill Posted 20 hours ago Posted 20 hours ago 39 minutes ago, nosejob said: I think he has 1 year left between 19 and 21? but less than 3 mil dead cap. Give them pick 30 and AJE. Sign BJ Hill short term as well. Yea typo. Should have been "isn't" getting a first. 1 Quote
Utah John Posted 19 hours ago Posted 19 hours ago Once the 2024 season started and it was clear how bad the Browns were, I actually posted here that the Browns would be better off if they traded Garrett, and that the Bills should try to get him. People said no way, we'd have to give up two first rounders. Well here we are, not making the SB largely because our pass rush is so bad. And the Browns have a lousy record anyway. And we're talking about sending them two first rounders. A year wasted where we could have had Garrett and who knows how that would have turned out. Quote
ColoradoBills Posted 3 hours ago Posted 3 hours ago A "Post June 1st" trade with Cleveland for Myles Garrett would work out great for all parties involved. Git er dun Beane! Quote
JerseyBills Posted 3 hours ago Posted 3 hours ago On 2/24/2025 at 11:36 AM, Chicken Boo said: Kamara to the Chiefs would be a nightmare. Going to be 30 this season, hasn't had an elite year in 3 seasons. Hope they overpay for him Quote
cle23 Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago 1 hour ago, ColoradoBills said: A "Post June 1st" trade with Cleveland for Myles Garrett would work out great for all parties involved. Git er dun Beane! Except then the draft would be over and the picks would all be future picks, so it makes everything a lot less clear. Cleveland would have nothing to show for the trade until next year. Might as well wait until next year at that point. Quote
MikePJ76 Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/6159189/2025/02/25/browns-no-interest-trading-myles-garrett/ Cleveland Browns general manager Andrew Berry has doubled down on his previous stance regarding Myles Garrett, repeating that the four-time All-Pro pass rusher is not available via trade. Berry spoke to reporters Tuesday afternoon at the NFL Scouting Combine, saying that the team’s stance “has not changed” and that doing what’s best for the organization involves keeping Garrett. “We respect and appreciate Myles,” Berry said. “We’re not interested in moving him.” 1 Quote
NewEra Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago On 2/23/2025 at 4:27 PM, nosejob said: One thing I've learned about Beane is that you never know what he's gonna do. I could see him maybe doing Trey Hendrickson who is currently on a 1 yr. deal between 19 and 21 mil. I think he would be an easier get on a 2-3 yr. deal and spreading the money out. 17.5. sacks the last 2 yrs. Cincy has been drafting guys (ie. Myles Murphy) and will probably deal. Shouldn't cost high picks. Then he can go get SexyDexy... He’d be my second choice. Thank god their owner sucks. He’s a beast- get him Quote
Mark Vader Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago On 2/23/2025 at 3:27 PM, nosejob said: One thing I've learned about Beane is that you never know what he's gonna do. I could see him maybe doing Trey Hendrickson who is currently on a 1 yr. deal between 19 and 21 mil. I think he would be an easier get on a 2-3 yr. deal and spreading the money out. 17.5. sacks the last 2 yrs. Cincy has been drafting guys (ie. Myles Murphy) and will probably deal. Shouldn't cost high picks. Then he can go get SexyDexy... Who? Quote
Goin Breakdown Posted 43 minutes ago Posted 43 minutes ago 43 minutes ago, MikePJ76 said: https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/6159189/2025/02/25/browns-no-interest-trading-myles-garrett/ Cleveland Browns general manager Andrew Berry has doubled down on his previous stance regarding Myles Garrett, repeating that the four-time All-Pro pass rusher is not available via trade. Berry spoke to reporters Tuesday afternoon at the NFL Scouting Combine, saying that the team’s stance “has not changed” and that doing what’s best for the organization involves keeping Garrett. “We respect and appreciate Myles,” Berry said. “We’re not interested in moving him.” And then once they trade him they'll be like... "At the time we weren't interested in trading him, but we respect Myles and wanted to honor him and all he's done for us. Some felt this trade worked for both sides" How was that? Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.