Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

One thing I've learned about Beane is that you never know what he's gonna do. I could see him maybe doing Trey Hendrickson who is currently on a 1 yr. deal between 19 and 21 mil. I think he would be an easier get on a 2-3 yr. deal and spreading the money out. 17.5. sacks the last 2 yrs. Cincy has been drafting guys (ie. Myles Murphy) and will probably deal. Shouldn't cost high picks.

 

Then he can go get SexyDexy...

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Agree 1
Posted
1 hour ago, nosejob said:

One thing I've learned about Beane is that you never know what he's gonna do. I could see him maybe doing Trey Hendrickson who is currently on a 1 yr. deal between 19 and 21 mil. I think he would be an easier get on a 2-3 yr. deal and spreading the money out. 17.5. sacks the last 2 yrs. Cincy has been drafting guys (ie. Myles Murphy) and will probably deal. Shouldn't cost high picks.

 

Then he can go get SexyDexy...


you’re telling me acquiring Trey Hendrickson from an AFC competitor won’t cost high picks? What??

 

He will go for a 1st + if traded

  • Disagree 1
  • Agree 1
Posted
9 minutes ago, Chicken Boo said:

Kamara to the Chiefs would be a nightmare.

Kamara to the Chiefs a couple of years ago would've been a nightmare.  Don't get me wrong, he would certainly help them out, but his best days are past him

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
1 minute ago, Ya Digg? said:

Kamara to the Chiefs a couple of years ago would've been a nightmare.  Don't get me wrong, he would certainly help them out, but his best days are past him

Same was said about Henry last year when he went to the ravens. Not saying you're wrong but we never know

Posted (edited)

I'm open to Hendrickson, depending on cost.. which probably means I'm not open to it given what the Bengals would likely want to trade him to us.  Adding a couple years to his deal to pair with Rousseau while not giving up a ton could be just what we need but I don't think we'd get him that easily from CIN.

 

As for the Cook, Kincaid, 1st for Parsons deal.. I do that in a second.  

 

Davis, Johnson and a 4th Round Pick is "good enough" for what we need at RB.

 

Knox & Davidson is "good enough" for what we need at TE.

 

Rousseau, Epenesa & Solomon is NOT good enough at DE.. and adding Parson to that group for Cook, Kincaid and 1st, immediately takes it from a below average room to an above average (potentially elite) room, while keeping both of our 2nds to add at DT if we want to further build up the DL.

 

And I would have zero issue paying big money to Rousseau if he proves he can be a monster opposite a true 1 EDGE.  

 

Pay QB, OL, DL and then constantly draft WR's, RB's, LB's, DB's and Safeties.

 

 

Edited by SCBills
Posted
45 minutes ago, Ya Digg? said:

Kamara to the Chiefs a couple of years ago would've been a nightmare.  Don't get me wrong, he would certainly help them out, but his best days are past him

 

I disagree.  

 

He still produced 1493 yards from scrimmage in 14 games on a ***** NO team.  

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
21 hours ago, Warriorspikes51 said:


you’re telling me acquiring Trey Hendrickson from an AFC competitor won’t cost high picks? What??

 

He will go for a 1st + if traded

all the ones we want at edge will cost 1st round picks !

Posted
5 hours ago, SCBills said:

I'm open to Hendrickson, depending on cost.. which probably means I'm not open to it given what the Bengals would likely want to trade him to us.  Adding a couple years to his deal to pair with Rousseau while not giving up a ton could be just what we need but I don't think we'd get him that easily from CIN.

 

As for the Cook, Kincaid, 1st for Parsons deal.. I do that in a second.  

 

Davis, Johnson and a 4th Round Pick is "good enough" for what we need at RB.

 

Knox & Davidson is "good enough" for what we need at TE.

 

Rousseau, Epenesa & Solomon is NOT good enough at DE.. and adding Parson to that group for Cook, Kincaid and 1st, immediately takes it from a below average room to an above average (potentially elite) room, while keeping both of our 2nds to add at DT if we want to further build up the DL.

 

And I would have zero issue paying big money to Rousseau if he proves he can be a monster opposite a true 1 EDGE.  

 

Pay QB, OL, DL and then constantly draft WR's, RB's, LB's, DB's and Safeties.

 

 

I sure would like the chance to see Rousseau with a monster on the other side and  and Fat Man in the Middle

( fat man is a compliment for 1 tech and or a dude who can play honest nose Tackle on a few plays.)

May not have all those luxuries though to assess Gregg's ceiling

Parson is not my 1st choice btw unless jerry wants to make it happen.

 If we cannot a deal

 Then you have to draft the stud DE early and  beast DT asap.

McD can do his thing with CB and Safety. FA would also work there

Posted (edited)
23 hours ago, Warriorspikes51 said:


you’re telling me acquiring Trey Hendrickson from an AFC competitor won’t cost high picks? What??

 

He will go for a 1st + if traded

 

Hendrickson isn't getting a 1st. If they can't renegotiate his deal they will cut him. Everyone knows that. Cincy doesn't have the leverage.

Edited by GunnerBill
Posted
17 minutes ago, GunnerBill said:

 

Hendrickson is getting a 1st. If they can't renegotiate his deal they will cut him. Everyone knows that. Cincy doesn't have the leverage.

I think he has 1 year left between 19 and 21? but less than 3 mil dead cap.  Give them pick 30 and AJE.      Sign BJ Hill short term as well.

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
39 minutes ago, nosejob said:

I think he has 1 year left between 19 and 21? but less than 3 mil dead cap.  Give them pick 30 and AJE.      Sign BJ Hill short term as well.

 

Yea typo. Should have been "isn't" getting a first.

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted

Once the 2024 season started and it was clear how bad the Browns were, I actually posted here that the Browns would be better off if they traded Garrett, and that the Bills should try to get him.  People said no way, we'd have to give up two first rounders.  Well here we are, not making the SB largely because our pass rush is so bad.  And the Browns have a lousy record anyway.  And we're talking about sending them two first rounders.  A year wasted where we could have had Garrett and who knows how that would have turned out.

Posted
On 2/24/2025 at 11:36 AM, Chicken Boo said:

Kamara to the Chiefs would be a nightmare.

Going to be 30 this season,  hasn't had an elite year in 3 seasons.  Hope they overpay for him

Posted
1 hour ago, ColoradoBills said:

A "Post June 1st" trade with Cleveland for Myles Garrett would work out great for all parties involved.

 

Git er dun Beane!

 

Except then the draft would be over and the picks would all be future picks, so it makes everything a lot less clear.  Cleveland would have nothing to show for the trade until next year.  Might as well wait until next year at that point.

Posted

https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/6159189/2025/02/25/browns-no-interest-trading-myles-garrett/

 

Cleveland Browns general manager Andrew Berry has doubled down on his previous stance regarding Myles Garrett, repeating that the four-time All-Pro pass rusher is not available via trade.

Berry spoke to reporters Tuesday afternoon at the NFL Scouting Combine, saying that the team’s stance “has not changed” and that doing what’s best for the organization involves keeping Garrett.

“We respect and appreciate Myles,” Berry said. “We’re not interested in moving him.”

  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted
On 2/23/2025 at 4:27 PM, nosejob said:

One thing I've learned about Beane is that you never know what he's gonna do. I could see him maybe doing Trey Hendrickson who is currently on a 1 yr. deal between 19 and 21 mil. I think he would be an easier get on a 2-3 yr. deal and spreading the money out. 17.5. sacks the last 2 yrs. Cincy has been drafting guys (ie. Myles Murphy) and will probably deal. Shouldn't cost high picks.

 

Then he can go get SexyDexy...

He’d be my second choice.  Thank god their owner sucks.  He’s a beast- get him

Posted
On 2/23/2025 at 3:27 PM, nosejob said:

One thing I've learned about Beane is that you never know what he's gonna do. I could see him maybe doing Trey Hendrickson who is currently on a 1 yr. deal between 19 and 21 mil. I think he would be an easier get on a 2-3 yr. deal and spreading the money out. 17.5. sacks the last 2 yrs. Cincy has been drafting guys (ie. Myles Murphy) and will probably deal. Shouldn't cost high picks.

 

Then he can go get SexyDexy...

Who?

Posted
43 minutes ago, MikePJ76 said:

https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/6159189/2025/02/25/browns-no-interest-trading-myles-garrett/

 

Cleveland Browns general manager Andrew Berry has doubled down on his previous stance regarding Myles Garrett, repeating that the four-time All-Pro pass rusher is not available via trade.

Berry spoke to reporters Tuesday afternoon at the NFL Scouting Combine, saying that the team’s stance “has not changed” and that doing what’s best for the organization involves keeping Garrett.

“We respect and appreciate Myles,” Berry said. “We’re not interested in moving him.”

And then once they trade him they'll be like...

"At the time we weren't interested in trading him, but we respect Myles and wanted to honor him and all he's done for us. Some felt this trade worked for both sides"

How was that?

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...