BillsFanNC Posted February 4 Author Posted February 4 Yup. The blatant money laundering and waste of USAID is reason enough to shut it down Their real mission was far more sinister. 1 1
Niagara Bill Posted February 4 Posted February 4 Let's make two things perfectly clear. 1. Rethinking how the US government spends tax payers money is a great great thing. Institutions that go decades without reinventing by the people who supply the funds are bound to be bias and potentially corrupt. None of these organizations should ever have a leadership more than 2 or 3 years without change. 2. You can tell Mr Trump and all American citizens that the claims that Canada receives US subsidizes not one penny of the billions and billions spent since 1961 from this organization came to Canada.
aristocrat Posted February 4 Posted February 4 13 hours ago, daz28 said: All the maggats were saying Biden was corrupt withholding money for Ukraine, but now trump can withhold money from anyone he wants, and it's "what he campaigned on". LOLZ the difference here would be the quid pro quo. is trump looking for something in return? or is she just shutting off the cash? we call agree sending money for food is a valuable cause. a lot of the rest of the stuff just looks it came out of the minds of snl writers. we're sending money to someone to write a comic book! you'd think some random celebrity interested in promoting the arts would just invest in that right?
Motorin' Posted February 4 Posted February 4 1 hour ago, aristocrat said: the difference here would be the quid pro quo. is trump looking for something in return? or is she just shutting off the cash? we call agree sending money for food is a valuable cause. a lot of the rest of the stuff just looks it came out of the minds of snl writers. we're sending money to someone to write a comic book! you'd think some random celebrity interested in promoting the arts would just invest in that right? A lot of it is a way to skirt oversight for black ops. A former CIA director will be the President of some NGO, and then will use the USAID funds to the NGO to do shady ops through an internation org that has no oversight. Like the US based org that funded COVID 19 in Wuhan. 1 1
BillsFanNC Posted February 4 Author Posted February 4 9 minutes ago, Motorin' said: A lot of it is a way to skirt oversight for black ops. A former CIA director will be the President of some NGO, and then will use the USAID funds to the NGO to do shady ops through an internation org that has no oversight. Like the US based org that funded COVID 19 in Wuhan. Also like using US taxpayer dollars to award grants to NGOs via USAID to fund censorship programs in foreign lands. 1
Doc Posted February 4 Posted February 4 16 hours ago, daz28 said: All the maggats were saying Biden was corrupt withholding money for Ukraine, but now trump can withhold money from anyone he wants, and it's "what he campaigned on". LOLZ No, people were saying that Biden withheld funds from Ukraine unless/until they fired a prosecutor looking into Burisma after Trump got impeached for withholding funds from Ukraine until he was sure they weren't as corrupt as before. Funny how after several years...
Motorin' Posted February 4 Posted February 4 1 hour ago, BillsFanNC said: Also like using US taxpayer dollars to award grants to NGOs via USAID to fund censorship programs in foreign lands. This is all stuff that Democrats used to eviscerate the Republicans and the CIA over. 2
Tommy Callahan Posted February 4 Posted February 4 10 minutes ago, IrishLass said: The pardons make more sense by the hour. 1 2
BillsFanNC Posted February 4 Author Posted February 4 If you had been listening to Mike Benz for the past year you would be way ahead of the curve on USAID.
daz28 Posted February 4 Posted February 4 8 hours ago, Orlando Buffalo said: Only to a dishonest person is a statement of fact, "framing". As for the second part, you do have a point since I doubt there is anything to stop Trump from doing exactly what Biden has done when he was vice president and president. In your statement of "fact", they in fact wanted Shokin dismissed for NOT thoroughly enough probing corruption. You may not agree with that, but it was the official policy. 6 hours ago, aristocrat said: the difference here would be the quid pro quo. is trump looking for something in return? or is she just shutting off the cash? we call agree sending money for food is a valuable cause. a lot of the rest of the stuff just looks it came out of the minds of snl writers. we're sending money to someone to write a comic book! you'd think some random celebrity interested in promoting the arts would just invest in that right? If he decides what does/doesn't get spent, then he certainly can be wide open to the nefarious action, that Biden was accused of. The "quid pro quo" you're accusing Biden of was actually the US policy.
daz28 Posted February 4 Posted February 4 4 hours ago, Doc said: No, people were saying that Biden withheld funds from Ukraine unless/until they fired a prosecutor looking into Burisma after Trump got impeached for withholding funds from Ukraine until he was sure they weren't as corrupt as before. Funny how after several years... You think it's unusual that the USA may have demands on countries before they receive funding? They even do that with Israel. trump was accused of, and impeached for withholding funds, concurrent with an investigation of a political rival of his.
Recommended Posts