daz28 Posted February 13 Posted February 13 54 minutes ago, BillsFanNC said: No, it was restored, because the sane, smart people showed the dumb, hasty people their mistake. That's the part Fox would leave out.
Doc Posted February 13 Posted February 13 1 hour ago, Roundybout said: Not yet. We have, however, made remarkable strides in treatment. HIV is basically a nuisance at this point because of the treatment regime. Yeah, it's a nuisance at this time. But likely have reached the limits of what he can do against it, i.e. eradicating it from the body is unlikely.
daz28 Posted February 13 Posted February 13 (edited) Just watched a funny video where Jamie Raskin had to remind Gym Jordan, that he was cheering on the guy that was brought in to do the job that he was supposed to do in the first place. I got a REAL strong feeling that the amount of fraud found and reported is going to drop off considerably after they're done with the culture war aspect of it. It will be republicans admitting that all the waste is from the budget they wrote passed. Not gonna happen. Hope you enjoyed the extended campaign bigotry rhetoric, though. LOL Edited February 13 by daz28
aristocrat Posted February 14 Posted February 14 10 hours ago, Roundybout said: Thanks President Elon 🙏 That medication has a shelf life of two years. So either it’s been sitting there for two years or they have some time to get it to people who need it. If it’s expiring then it’s been there two years lol. How long has trump been in office? I can’t remember please answer
Doc Posted February 14 Posted February 14 Just now, aristocrat said: That medication has a shelf life of two years. So either it’s been sitting there for two years or they have some time to get it to people who need it. If it’s expiring then it’s been there two years lol. How long has trump been in office? I can’t remember please answer Good catch. Actually it's good for about a year longer than the expiration date, a pharmacist once told me (one time when he was checking for outdates at my center, having dinged us in the past for ones expired by a month).
Roundybout Posted February 14 Posted February 14 1 hour ago, Doc said: Yeah, it's a nuisance at this time. But likely have reached the limits of what he can do against it, i.e. eradicating it from the body is unlikely. “We set sail on this new sea because there is new knowledge to be gained, and new rights to be won, and they must be won and used for the progress of all people.”
aristocrat Posted February 14 Posted February 14 10 hours ago, Roundybout said: Cutting $25,000 from USAID to turn around and raise the debt ceiling $4 trillion and then give Elon $400 million for his awful trucks is a very odd form of fiscal responsibility. In other words, it ain’t happening. You voted for the 400 mil bud. lol this is hilarious
Roundybout Posted February 14 Posted February 14 11 hours ago, aristocrat said: You voted for the 400 mil bud. lol this is hilarious It was changed during the transition period, for one thing, and another - why did they suddenly scrub “Tesla” from the procurement order?
JDHillFan Posted February 14 Posted February 14 25 minutes ago, Roundybout said: It was changed during the transition period, for one thing, and another - why did they suddenly scrub “Tesla” from the procurement order? This is a manufactured crisis to keep you foaming at the mouth. The obvious answer to your question is that listing Tesla specifically created the appearance of impropriety. A no-no. Despite the excitability of you and Maddow, there is no procurement order or contract. https://fortune.com/2025/02/13/armored-tesla-state-department-millions-elon-musk-ceo-doge/ the Biden administration asked it to scout interest from private companies to obtain armored electric vehicles. Accordingly, the department issued a request for information and only one company responded at the time. The next step was intended to be an official solicitation
Roundybout Posted February 14 Posted February 14 12 minutes ago, JDHillFan said: This is a manufactured crisis to keep you foaming at the mouth. The obvious answer to your question is that listing Tesla specifically created the appearance of impropriety. A no-no. Despite the excitability of you and Maddow, there is no procurement order or contract. https://fortune.com/2025/02/13/armored-tesla-state-department-millions-elon-musk-ceo-doge/ the Biden administration asked it to scout interest from private companies to obtain armored electric vehicles. Accordingly, the department issued a request for information and only one company responded at the time. The next step was intended to be an official solicitation Good! Let’s hope it stays that way, because otherwise it seems a bit corrupt wouldn’t you say?
JDHillFan Posted February 14 Posted February 14 10 minutes ago, Roundybout said: Good! Let’s hope it stays that way, because otherwise it seems a bit corrupt wouldn’t you say? One would need insight to the bidding to declare it corrupt. As it is, you and Maddow have gone after a non-story.
Roundybout Posted February 14 Posted February 14 7 minutes ago, JDHillFan said: One would need insight to the bidding to declare it corrupt. As it is, you and Maddow have gone after a non-story. No, I think Tesla on a purchase order for armored cyber trucks is a pretty good story to go after, given his status in the prominent and well-respected DOGE club.
Doc Posted February 14 Posted February 14 1 hour ago, Roundybout said: It was changed during the transition period, for one thing, and another - why did they suddenly scrub “Tesla” from the procurement order? Because it wasn't just Teslas being ordered.
All_Pro_Bills Posted February 14 Posted February 14 6 minutes ago, Doc said: Because it wasn't just Teslas being ordered. Because it was actually nothing being ordered. It was a Hail Mary attempt to discredit the investigation into government waste that won't work. The swamp is desperate to keep their gravy train rolling. I can't imagine anyone could be for continuing wasteful spending, fraud, and abuse of funding activities unless they're in on the take and their livelihood depends on it. 1 1
JFKjr Posted February 14 Posted February 14 53 minutes ago, Roundybout said: Good! Let’s hope it stays that way, because otherwise it seems a bit corrupt wouldn’t you say? What would you know about "a bit" of corruption when things in the billions and trillions don't faze you?
BillsFanNC Posted February 14 Author Posted February 14 Again, they want you focused on the ridiculous funding projects like transgender surgeries in Guatemala. It's the CIA regime change front and the mass censorship efforts that the democrats are really freaking out over. 1
All_Pro_Bills Posted February 14 Posted February 14 3 minutes ago, BillsFanNC said: Again, they want you focused on the ridiculous funding projects like transgender surgeries in Guatemala. It's the CIA regime change front and the mass censorship efforts that the democrats are really freaking out over. This guy sums up what's going on pretty well. https://www.kunstler.com/p/darkness-dying 2
Recommended Posts