JFKjr Posted February 11 Posted February 11 Just now, Roundybout said: Whomp whomp I would agree that four years ago very few people knew what USAID was really up to, including Tom Cotton. So many surprises! And many more to come. 1
Roundybout Posted February 11 Posted February 11 6 minutes ago, JFKjr said: I would agree that four years ago very few people knew what USAID was really up to, including Tom Cotton. So many surprises! And many more to come. Or it’s simply the new MAGA word of the day that programs you to be mad
AlBUNDY4TDS Posted February 11 Posted February 11 Just now, Roundybout said: Or it’s simply the new MAGA word of the day that programs you to be mad Or as the resident government ****, you just cannot admit our government just throws our tax dollars into the proverbial coal furnace.
Roundybout Posted February 11 Posted February 11 2 minutes ago, AlBUNDY4TDS said: Or as the resident government ****, you just cannot admit our government just throws our tax dollars into the proverbial coal furnace. Helping eradicate AIDS is a fine use of our money
JFKjr Posted February 11 Posted February 11 3 minutes ago, Roundybout said: Or it’s simply the new MAGA word of the day that programs you to be mad I'm not mad, I'm absolutely delighted at what's going on with Trump/Musk. Word is this is only the beginning of some massive stuff they'll be uncovering. So if YOU aren't mad, and I'm loving life, I guess nobody's mad and all is well! 1 1
Doc Posted February 11 Posted February 11 (edited) 6 minutes ago, Roundybout said: Helping eradicate AIDS is a fine use of our money HIV will likely never be eradicated. But since the arrival of protease inhibitors over 20 years ago, people with it can live a long life. Edited February 11 by Doc
BillsFanNC Posted February 11 Author Posted February 11 "Eradicating AIDS" one covert regime change op at a time. The always reliable Washington Post. 1
Roundybout Posted February 11 Posted February 11 9 minutes ago, Doc said: HIV will likely never be eradicated. But since the arrival of protease inhibitors over 20 years ago, people with it can live a long life. How do you think that research was funded?
Pokebball Posted February 11 Posted February 11 39 minutes ago, Roundybout said: Whomp whomp So your position is, since USAID does some good, everything it does is good?
daz28 Posted February 11 Posted February 11 10 minutes ago, Pokebball said: So your position is, since USAID does some good, everything it does is good? As usual the truth is somewhere between what both parties are selling you. The rotting crops, unpaid farmers, and starving people are empirical evidence that the gasoline and match approach wasn't wise.
Roundybout Posted February 11 Posted February 11 12 minutes ago, Pokebball said: So your position is, since USAID does some good, everything it does is good? Of course not. If Elon executed his plan as a systemic and careful review of spending, followed by a public report and recommendation to Congress, I’d really have no issue with it. His methods are unconstitutional, insipid nonsense designed to generate outrage. Why do you think Charlie Kirk and the like were foaming at the mouth watching the USAID signage come down? 1
AlBUNDY4TDS Posted February 11 Posted February 11 1 minute ago, Roundybout said: Of course not. If Elon executed his plan as a systemic and careful review of spending, followed by a public report and recommendation to Congress, I’d really have no issue with it. His methods are unconstitutional, insipid nonsense designed to generate outrage. Why do you think Charlie Kirk and the like were foaming at the mouth watching the USAID signage come down? The only one outraged is you, holy hell. 1
daz28 Posted February 11 Posted February 11 1 minute ago, Roundybout said: Of course not. If Elon executed his plan as a systemic and careful review of spending, followed by a public report and recommendation to Congress, I’d really have no issue with it. His methods are unconstitutional, insipid nonsense designed to generate outrage. Why do you think Charlie Kirk and the like were foaming at the mouth watching the USAID signage come down? It's almost comical how they paint anyone who wants a metered approach to be pro wasteful spending. 1 1
Roundybout Posted February 11 Posted February 11 3 minutes ago, AlBUNDY4TDS said: The only one outraged is you, holy hell. No, don’t think that’s true but thanks for trying.
Doc Posted February 11 Posted February 11 1 hour ago, Roundybout said: How do you think that research was funded? Was it by USAID?
Pokebball Posted February 12 Posted February 12 4 hours ago, Roundybout said: Of course not. If Elon executed his plan as a systemic and careful review of spending, followed by a public report and recommendation to Congress, I’d really have no issue with it. His methods are unconstitutional, insipid nonsense designed to generate outrage. Why do you think Charlie Kirk and the like were foaming at the mouth watching the USAID signage come down? Again, Musk isn't shutting anything down. He's identifying suspicious payments and Trump is making the decisions
Recommended Posts