Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
1 minute ago, Roundybout said:


Then tell Congress to reduce its funding. The way these things are supposed to be done, not through President Elon. 
 

Why do you support taking away tools to help our government run better? Weird.

What tool is being removed that helps out government run better?

Posted
9 minutes ago, Orlando Buffalo said:

What tool is being removed that helps out government run better?

Removing the Pro subscription is like keeping a stockbroker from buying a Bloomberg terminal 

Posted
6 minutes ago, Orlando Buffalo said:

What tool is being removed that helps out government run better?

I think the premise is Politicos subscription service at $10k per user has some value to government employees. Maybe so, but to me it sounds like a great way to launder USAID payments to fund a political activist journal that echos the views of the liberal establishment funding them to say what they're told to say. 

  • Thank you (+1) 4
Posted
22 minutes ago, Roundybout said:

Removing the Pro subscription is like keeping a stockbroker from buying a Bloomberg terminal 

I disagree, the Bloomberg terminal lets you see data that the common man can't find in real time. There is nothing in Pro that is special that the common man can't find, unless you want a political writers opinion.

Posted
11 minutes ago, Orlando Buffalo said:

I disagree, the Bloomberg terminal lets you see data that the common man can't find in real time. There is nothing in Pro that is special that the common man can't find, unless you want a political writers opinion.


Fair, but the point is that the Pro subscription provides analysis and data that would take a very long time otherwise to get. 

Posted
1 hour ago, Roundybout said:


Fair, but the point is that the Pro subscription provides analysis and data that would take a very long time otherwise to get. 


look at this objectively. People aren’t happy with how the government has been running. That’s why you got trump. So what they’ve been doing isn’t working. To sit here and be happy where we are is just ignorant. 

Posted
6 hours ago, dgrochester55 said:

 

He doesn't, you just hate anyone that thinks differently from you and want to go back to the days where dissenting views were censored. You also hate that you can't treat the country like.Veruca Salt treats her parents in Charlie and the chocolate factory ("I want a pony!") and that the country is exposing the wasteful spending."

 

Why do you hate freedom of speech and fiscal responsibility.?

 

You don't know me. This isn't about me. This isn't about freedom of speech or fiscal responsibility.

 

There's a reason they want to focus your attention here instead of on Musk's glaring conflict of interest, being a government contractor with over $20 billion while gaining control of our digital and financial infrastructure.

 

What could possibly go wrong?

Posted
25 minutes ago, Homelander said:

 

You don't know me. This isn't about me. This isn't about freedom of speech or fiscal responsibility.

 

There's a reason they want to focus your attention here instead of on Musk's glaring conflict of interest, being a government contractor with over $20 billion while gaining control of our digital and financial infrastructure.

 

What could possibly go wrong?

 

What exactly has been going right?

Posted
26 minutes ago, Homelander said:

 

You don't know me. This isn't about me. This isn't about freedom of speech or fiscal responsibility.

 

There's a reason they want to focus your attention here instead of on Musk's glaring conflict of interest, being a government contractor with over $20 billion while gaining control of our digital and financial infrastructure.

 

What could possibly go wrong?

 

RUSSIA!!!

Lebron James Sport GIF by NBA

Posted
2 hours ago, Roundybout said:


Fair, but the point is that the Pro subscription provides analysis and data that would take a very long time otherwise to get. 

Analysis maybe, but how would politico have data any quicker about government than the government employees? 

38 minutes ago, Homelander said:

 

You don't know me. This isn't about me. This isn't about freedom of speech or fiscal responsibility.

 

There's a reason they want to focus your attention here instead of on Musk's glaring conflict of interest, being a government contractor with over $20 billion while gaining control of our digital and financial infrastructure.

 

What could possibly go wrong?

 

Did you mean that Elon is worth 400 billion? I really am not sure your point but if you think a $20 billion is that big of deal for him I  doubt it. His best play for long term $1 trillion is to make American successful and the government less powerful. 

Posted
42 minutes ago, Homelander said:

 

You don't know me. This isn't about me. This isn't about freedom of speech or fiscal responsibility.

 

There's a reason they want to focus your attention here instead of on Musk's glaring conflict of interest, being a government contractor with over $20 billion while gaining control of our digital and financial infrastructure.

 

What could possibly go wrong?

 

I think we'll be fine, we lived thru 4 years of Biden and his lackeys bumblephuking their way under, around, and thru racist bridges.

Posted
28 minutes ago, Orlando Buffalo said:

Analysis maybe, but how would politico have data any quicker about government than the government employees? 

Did you mean that Elon is worth 400 billion? I really am not sure your point but if you think a $20 billion is that big of deal for him I  doubt it. His best play for long term $1 trillion is to make American successful and the government less powerful. 


Come on. Elon wants to destroy the world’s largest economy so that he dies in poverty along with his 15 kids. 

×
×
  • Create New...