JaCrispy Posted January 31 Posted January 31 (edited) RFK exposes the corruption rotting our government… Edited January 31 by JaCrispy 1
Joe Ferguson forever Posted January 31 Posted January 31 https://edition.cnn.com/2025/01/30/politics/video/rfk-confirmation-hearing-cassidy-concerns-digvid watch this Republican gastroenterologist school him on vaccines.
JaCrispy Posted January 31 Author Posted January 31 (edited) 10 minutes ago, Joe Ferguson forever said: https://edition.cnn.com/2025/01/30/politics/video/rfk-confirmation-hearing-cassidy-concerns-digvid watch this Republican gastroenterologist school him on vaccines. I wish the video included RFK’s response instead of just a monologue from the senator… Edited January 31 by JaCrispy
AlBUNDY4TDS Posted January 31 Posted January 31 9 minutes ago, Joe Ferguson forever said: https://edition.cnn.com/2025/01/30/politics/video/rfk-confirmation-hearing-cassidy-concerns-digvid watch this Republican gastroenterologist school him on vaccines. Cnn has lost all credibility. But look at you go.
Joe Ferguson forever Posted January 31 Posted January 31 (edited) 3 minutes ago, JaCrispy said: I wish the video included RFK’s response instead of just a monologue from the senator… look it up Einstein. Its public record Edited January 31 by Joe Ferguson forever
JaCrispy Posted January 31 Author Posted January 31 (edited) 7 minutes ago, Joe Ferguson forever said: look it up Einstein. Its public record I just think it odd that cnn would only post a senators monologue instead of including the witness’s response, almost like it didn’t fit the narrative, so they didn’t want to include it… Journalism at its finest, I see…😉 In the videos I posted Jimmy Dore had both the questions and responses…👍 Edited January 31 by JaCrispy 1
Joe Ferguson forever Posted January 31 Posted January 31 1 hour ago, JaCrispy said: I just think it odd that cnn would only post a senators monologue instead of including the witness’s response, almost like it didn’t fit the narrative, so they didn’t want to include it… Journalism at its finest, I see…😉 In the videos I posted Jimmy Dore had both the questions and responses…👍 as i said, it's public knowledge. you can even get a transcript! Cassidy is chair of the committee. he seems skeptical at best. And he's right. the guy's opinions change with the wind, not with the science. he's a crock.
Joe Ferguson forever Posted January 31 Posted January 31 7 minutes ago, B-Man said: rfk jrs answers are sponsored by his payments from his gardisal case...helping increase the incidence of cervical cancer everywhere!
JaCrispy Posted January 31 Author Posted January 31 (edited) Poor Joe, to lose all objectivity and ability to be skeptical of Big Pharma, only to be peddling their propaganda… I believe RFK listed a number of things he was called a conspiracy theorist on, only to be proven correct after further investigations, and yet you are still never skeptical of the Big Pharma narrative… Pfizer had to pay out the largest settlement ever, 20 years ago, for malpractice, and yet you continue to toe the line like a good little pawn, never curious, and never asking questions… Why do you think Big Pharma made it so people couldn’t bring lawsuits against them, for the Covid vax- because they were on the up and up with testing??? 🤣🤣🤣 Come on, man…please tell me you’re not that naive…please tell me you’re not such a partisan that you can’t see the forest through the trees… Edited January 31 by JaCrispy 1
Wacka Posted January 31 Posted January 31 Hey Quack, how much free stuff did you get from Big Pharma?
Steve O Posted January 31 Posted January 31 I might have to side with Bill O'Reilly on this one, who says Jr. isn't qualified for HHS secretary but would make a good nutrition czar.
JaCrispy Posted January 31 Author Posted January 31 (edited) 2 minutes ago, Steve O said: I might have to side with Bill O'Reilly on this one, who says Jr. isn't qualified for HHS secretary but would make a good nutrition czar. And the mentally ill transgender was qualified? 🤔 If that person was qualified, RFK is more than qualified…👍 Edited January 31 by JaCrispy
Joe Ferguson forever Posted January 31 Posted January 31 (edited) 26 minutes ago, JaCrispy said: Poor Joe, to lose all objectivity and ability to be skeptical of Big Pharma, only to be peddling their propaganda… I believe RFK listed a number of things he was called a conspiracy theorist on, only to be proven correct after further investigations, and yet you are still never skeptical of the Big Pharma narrative… Pfizer had to pay out the largest settlement ever, 20 years ago, for malpractice, and yet you continue to toe the line like a good little pawn, never curious, and never asking questions… Why do you think Big Pharma made it so people couldn’t bring lawsuits against them, for the Covid vax- because they were on the up and up with testing??? 🤣🤣🤣 Come on, man…please tell me you’re not that naive…please tell me you’re not such a partisan that you can’t see the forest through the trees… you don't know what you're talking about. the largest set5tlement was 7 billion from purdue pharma for oxycontin. And they deserved to be forced into bankruptcy. Pfizer just lost a much smaller case for kickbacks to prescribers. There's bad actors n every business. But overall, pharma companies are essential to keeping millions of people alive.. Edited January 31 by Joe Ferguson forever
JaCrispy Posted January 31 Author Posted January 31 1 minute ago, Joe Ferguson forever said: you don't know what you're talking about. the largest set5tlement was 7 billion from purdue pharma for oxycontin. And they deserved to be forced into bankruptcy. Pfizer just lost a much smaller case for kickbacks to prescribers. There's bad actors n every business. But overall, pharma companies are essential to keeping millions of people alive.. And yet RFK is the villain for questioning their testing of vaccines? Riiiiiight….
Steve O Posted January 31 Posted January 31 Just now, JaCrispy said: And the mentally ill transgender was qualified? 🤔 That's a good point. But we don't need another unqualified person in the position. Hey, I like most of Jr's ideas, but also respect Bill, who researches these things way more than I do.
Joe Ferguson forever Posted January 31 Posted January 31 (edited) 15 minutes ago, Wacka said: Hey Quack, how much free stuff did you get from Big Pharma? would you still be alive if big pharma didn't manufacture anti rejection drugs? I was a speaker a few times for drugs I thought worthy. It was work. It took time and preparation. Speaking to knowledgable colleagues can be challenging. But no as challenging as trying to convince dolts of obvious truths. 4 minutes ago, JaCrispy said: And yet RFK is the villain for questioning their testing of vaccines? Riiiiiight…. so you're not admitting u were incorrect....riiiight Edited January 31 by Joe Ferguson forever
JaCrispy Posted January 31 Author Posted January 31 4 minutes ago, Joe Ferguson forever said: would you still be alive if big pharma didn't manufacture anti rejection drugs? I was a speaker a few times for drugs I thought worthy. It was work. It took time and preparation. Speaking to knowledgable colleagues can be challenging. But no as challenging as trying to convince dolts of obvious truths. so you're not admitting u were incorrect....riiiight So I got the actual name of the company wrong…The premise of my argument still stands, in that we should be questioning Big Pharma at every turn and not just rubber stamping everything they want to do…wouldn’t you agree? 👍
Steve O Posted January 31 Posted January 31 3 minutes ago, JaCrispy said: And yet RFK is the villain for questioning their testing of vaccines? Riiiiiight…. Anyone who had the vaccine was the test group, anyone who thinks due diligence was done before releasing them is kidding themselves. The results can be found below, pretty eye opening. Data is taken from the government's own vaers world wide website. https://openvaers.com/ 1
JaCrispy Posted January 31 Author Posted January 31 1 minute ago, Steve O said: Anyone who had the vaccine was the test group, anyone who thinks due diligence was done before releasing them is kidding themselves. The results can be found below, pretty eye opening. Data is taken from the government's own vaers world wide website. https://openvaers.com/ Thank you…now tell this to Joe, because based on his arguments, you’d think he was being paid by Pfizer 😉 2
Joe Ferguson forever Posted January 31 Posted January 31 (edited) 22 minutes ago, Steve O said: Anyone who had the vaccine was the test group, anyone who thinks due diligence was done before releasing them is kidding themselves. The results can be found below, pretty eye opening. Data is taken from the government's own vaers world wide website. https://openvaers.com/ from the actual HHS VAERS site: VAERS accepts reports of adverse events that occur following vaccination. Anyone, including Healthcare providers, vaccine manufacturers, and the public can submit reports to the system. While very important in monitoring vaccine safety, VAERS reports alone cannot be used to determine if a vaccine caused or contributed to an adverse event or illness. Vaccine providers are encouraged to report any clinically significant health problem following vaccination to VAERS even if they are not sure if the vaccine was the cause. In some situations, reporting to VAERS is required of healthcare providers and vaccine manufacturers. VAERS reports may contain information that is incomplete, inaccurate, coincidental, or unverifiable. Reports to VAERS can also be biased. As a result, there are limitations on how the data can be used scientifically. Data from VAERS reports should always be interpreted with these limitations in mind. The strengths of VAERS are that it is national in scope and can often quickly detect an early hint or warning of a safety problem with a vaccine. VAERS is one component of CDC's and FDA's multifaceted approach to monitoring safety after vaccines are licensed or authorized for use. There are multiple, complementary systems that CDC and FDA use to capture and validate data from different sources. VAERS is designed to rapidly detect unusual or unexpected patterns of adverse events, also referred to as “safety signals.” If a possible safety signal is found in VAERS, further analysis is performed with other safety systems, such as the CDC’s Vaccine Safety Datalink (VSD) and Clinical Immunization Safety Assessment (CISA) Project, or in the FDA BEST (Biologics Effectiveness and Safety) system. These systems are less impacted by the limitations of spontaneous and voluntary reporting in VAERS and can better assess possible links between vaccination and adverse events. Additionally, CDC and FDA cannot provide individual medical advice regarding any report to VAERS. Key considerations and limitations of VAERS data: The number of reports alone cannot be interpreted as evidence of a causal association between a vaccine and an adverse event, or as evidence about the existence, severity, frequency, or rates of problems associated with vaccines. Reports may include incomplete, inaccurate, coincidental and unverified information. VAERS does not obtain follow up records on every report. If a report is classified as serious, VAERS requests additional information, such as health records, to further evaluate the report. VAERS data are limited to vaccine adverse event reports received between 1990 and the most recent date for which data are available. VAERS data do not represent all known safety information for a vaccine and should be interpreted in the context of other scientific information. VAERS data available to the public include only the initial report data to VAERS. Updated data which contains data from medical records and corrections reported during follow up are used by the government for analysis. However, for numerous reasons including data consistency, these amended data are not available to the public. Additionally, reports to VAERS that appear to be potentially false or fabricated with the intent to mislead CDC and FDA may be reviewed before they are added to the VAERS database. Knowingly filing a false VAERS report is a violation of Federal law (18 U.S. Code § 1001) punishable by fine and imprisonment. A little knowledge is a dangerous thing... Edited January 31 by Joe Ferguson forever
Recommended Posts