Buffalo03 Posted 6 hours ago Posted 6 hours ago We need a pass rush. Until we get one, we have no chance at stopping Mahomes in the playoffs. I don't care about salary cap and I don't care much about draft picks. Do what it takes to get Garrett out of Cleveland or at the very least Crosby out of Vegas. Crosby, I think will cost a little less but we have to take a swing. On top of that, Khalil Mack is a free agent. Again, I don't care about Salary cap and I don't trust finding the right player in the draft. We have already tried this numerous times and it isn't working. I would feel better with a known commodity. I know it's a long shot that we sign both. But if I'm Beane, I'm taking a swing on both. If we give up 2 first round picks for Garrett, I don't care. If there is a player to do that for, he is the guy. Crosby would probably be at least 1 first round pick. Make the moves, get to Mahomes and that's it. We will never get past them if we don't 2 2 Quote
TFBillsfan Posted 6 hours ago Posted 6 hours ago I’ve come to the conclusion the Bills should really lean into trading for a Dexter Lawrence, Jeffrey Simmons or Trey Hendrickson if possible. Particularly, Lawrence or Simmons as neither of those teams are going anywhere soon. They would instantly change the entire dynamic of the D. Unfortunately, Beane has missed on multiple picks in the draft. If the Bills can somehow find a disruptor on the DL and a ball hawk in the secondary, it would dramatically alter their D! Easier said than done but they have 10 picks in the upcoming draft. 6 1 Quote
GolfandBills Posted 6 hours ago Posted 6 hours ago 4 minutes ago, TFBillsfan said: I’ve come to the conclusion the Bills should really lean into trading for a Dexter Lawrence, Jeffrey Simmons or Trey Hendrickson if possible. Particularly, Lawrence or Simmons as neither of those teams are going anywhere soon. They would instantly change the entire dynamic of the D. Unfortunately, Beane has missed on multiple picks in the draft. If the Bills can somehow find a disruptor on the DL and a ball hawk in the secondary, it would dramatically alter their D! Easier said than done but they have 10 picks in the upcoming draft. Yeah I’m tired of drafting DL early it really hasn’t gone well. Make a trade for one of those guys you mentioned imo that’s way better use of a later 1st 1 1 Quote
Brianmoorman4jesus Posted 6 hours ago Posted 6 hours ago The QBs in the modern day offense get rid of the ball to fast. Expecting guys to get home isn’t realistic. Truly, you need to blitz. A lot. That’s the answer. Get up tight on WRs when the ball comes out fast and confuse them with blitzes. You are NOT going to get there with 4. It’s not 1975. The Qb is getting rid of the ball in 2 sec. That’s why this defense sucks. The guy is stuck in a different era. Those pass rushers will be neutralized. You need to send pressure and confuse the QB. The scheme Is the problem 1 2 2 Quote
Steptide Posted 6 hours ago Posted 6 hours ago It might be time to bring in an experienced defensive coordinator. Someone with years of experience. I know McDermott is technically that, but maybe someone from the outside. I wouldn't hate bringing back jim Schwartz. I would've loved selah as DC if he didn't go back to San Fran. I just think it might be time to make some big changes 1 Quote
SCBills Posted 6 hours ago Posted 6 hours ago (edited) In fairness, the 49ers have Nick Bosa and it hasn't mattered when they've had their shot at Kansas City. That said, they also don't have Josh Allen and with him cancelling out Patrick Mahomes, the main difference between their postseason defense and ours has been health, Spags and Chris Jones. We have to, at least, find our Chris Jones this offseason... and all the smoke points to Maxx Crosby. Dexter Lawrence, if we could make a move for him, would also make a lot of sense next to Ed Oliver.. essentially upgrading our DT position in two spots by upgrading one. Edited 6 hours ago by SCBills 1 Quote
Lost Posted 6 hours ago Posted 6 hours ago 1 minute ago, Brianmoorman4jesus said: The QBs in the modern day offense get rid of the ball to fast. Expecting guys to get home isn’t realistic. Truly, you need to blitz. A lot. That’s the answer. Get up tight on WRs when the ball comes out fast and confuse them with blitzes. You are NOT going to get there with 4. It’s not 1975. The Qb is getting rid of the ball in 2 sec. That’s why this defense sucks. The guy is stuck in a different era. Those pass rushers will be neutralized. You need to send pressure and confuse the QB. The scheme Is the problem I agree with this. No amount of elite pass rushers is going to have much effect against elite QBs like Mahomes or Burrow. They might dominate against bad to average teams and QBs but the ones who are getting the ball out that quick or just elusive from the pass rush are still making plays no matter what. 1 Quote
Orlando Buffalo Posted 6 hours ago Posted 6 hours ago 10 minutes ago, TFBillsfan said: I’ve come to the conclusion the Bills should really lean into trading for a Dexter Lawrence, Jeffrey Simmons or Trey Hendrickson if possible. Particularly, Lawrence or Simmons as neither of those teams are going anywhere soon. They would instantly change the entire dynamic of the D. Unfortunately, Beane has missed on multiple picks in the draft. If the Bills can somehow find a disruptor on the DL and a ball hawk in the secondary, it would dramatically alter their D! Easier said than done but they have 10 picks in the upcoming draft. Dexter Lawrence on this DL would be impressive. The other guys I don't think are as good but overall thought is good. Quote
KentuckyBillsFan Posted 6 hours ago Posted 6 hours ago (edited) 2 minutes ago, Steptide said: It might be time to bring in an experienced defensive coordinator. Someone with years of experience. I know McDermott is technically that, but maybe someone from the outside. I wouldn't hate bringing back jim Schwartz. I would've loved selah as DC if he didn't go back to San Fran. I just think it might be time to make some big changes It's very obvious McDermott needs to hand off the defense to someone else. That side of the ball needs a complete new way of thinking. No way McDermott does that though. Edited 6 hours ago by KentuckyBillsFan 1 Quote
T master Posted 6 hours ago Posted 6 hours ago 4 minutes ago, Brianmoorman4jesus said: The QBs in the modern day offense get rid of the ball to fast. Expecting guys to get home isn’t realistic. Truly, you need to blitz. A lot. That’s the answer. Get up tight on WRs when the ball comes out fast and confuse them with blitzes. You are NOT going to get there with 4. It’s not 1975. The Qb is getting rid of the ball in 2 sec. That’s why this defense sucks. The guy is stuck in a different era. Those pass rushers will be neutralized. You need to send pressure and confuse the QB. The scheme Is the problem Well that and that when your best pass rusher is getting held by the oppositions TE and it doesn't get called that kind of negates the pass rush so then there's that ... Quote
Don Otreply Posted 6 hours ago Posted 6 hours ago 2 minutes ago, Brianmoorman4jesus said: The QBs in the modern day offense get rid of the ball to fast. Expecting guys to get home isn’t realistic. Truly, you need to blitz. A lot. That’s the answer. Get up tight on WRs when the ball comes out fast and confuse them with blitzes. You are NOT going to get there with 4. It’s not 1975. The Qb is getting rid of the ball in 2 sec. That’s why this defense sucks. The guy is stuck in a different era. Those pass rushers will be neutralized. You need to send pressure and confuse the QB. The scheme Is the problem Agree, our soft zone D is, and has not worked particularly well for something like seven years…, the problem is that evidently it’s all Sean knows how to implement, and then we don’t have the personnel to have even a chance at making it work, Change has to happen, if not we have gotten as far as Sean’s scheme is gonna go, 1 Quote
Billz4ever Posted 6 hours ago Posted 6 hours ago 4 minutes ago, Brianmoorman4jesus said: The QBs in the modern day offense get rid of the ball to fast. Expecting guys to get home isn’t realistic. Truly, you need to blitz. A lot. That’s the answer. Get up tight on WRs when the ball comes out fast and confuse them with blitzes. You are NOT going to get there with 4. It’s not 1975. The Qb is getting rid of the ball in 2 sec. That’s why this defense sucks. The guy is stuck in a different era. Those pass rushers will be neutralized. You need to send pressure and confuse the QB. The scheme Is the problem While I would agree for the pass rush, but we still need to get better up front for stopping the run, especially when you have a team of smaller LBs and play a base nickel. I'm sick of seeing this defense get gashed for 10 yds a play at times on the ground throughout the season. 1 Quote
Negan Posted 6 hours ago Posted 6 hours ago You ever get the feeling, it seems no matter what we do it will never be enough. It will be shame for Josh Allen to never win a ring. Quote
BuffaloRebound Posted 6 hours ago Posted 6 hours ago Giants aren’t trading Lawrence. He’s their best player and those guys need to win now. Simmons is interesting. That’s a rebuild, his contract is tradable, and this defense desperately needs a guy with an edge. He’s kind of a young Ndamkong Suh just not as dirty. Quote
D. L. Hot-Flamethrower Posted 6 hours ago Posted 6 hours ago If you're going to blitz you need guys who can cover man. 1 Quote
Billz4ever Posted 6 hours ago Posted 6 hours ago 2 minutes ago, MPL said: Can we just trade for Steve Spagnuolo already? Spags D is very personnel dependent. KC has more talent on defense than the Bills do to be able to make it work. Last 3 playoff games against the Chiefs the combines score is 95-89. The Chiefs are 6 points better against what most would consider a clearly inferior defense in terms of both personnel and coaching. Is Spags really that great? Quote
Brianmoorman4jesus Posted 6 hours ago Posted 6 hours ago Just now, D. L. Hot-Flamethrower said: If you're going to blitz you need guys who can cover man. Well that’s fine but truly they need to cover less. The ball will be out faster Quote
D. L. Hot-Flamethrower Posted 6 hours ago Posted 6 hours ago Just now, Brianmoorman4jesus said: Well that’s fine but truly they need to cover less. The ball will be out faster If they're uncoverable then why blitz more. I'll tell you why, because zone leaves too much space for a guy like Burrow to slice and dice. You need guys who can cover immediately. No one can cover over a long period of time. Quote
Brianmoorman4jesus Posted 6 hours ago Posted 6 hours ago 2 minutes ago, D. L. Hot-Flamethrower said: If they're uncoverable then why blitz more. I'll tell you why, because zone leaves too much space for a guy like Burrow to slice and dice. You need guys who can cover immediately. No one can cover over a long period of time. That’s not what I’m saying. I feel like it’d be a lot easier on our corners. You’re saying uncover able. I don’t feel that at all. I feel like we’d be fine. We are playing way to soft and way to far off. I feel like up on the line and physical our corners will be in better shape. I think every single issue we have is this defensive scheme. I literally hate it. We have the complete opposite idea of what an effective defense should be. We should be fast, physical and setting the tone. Our offense plays that way. We are such absolute *****’s on defense because of McDermott 1 Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.