JerseyBills Posted Monday at 01:26 PM Posted Monday at 01:26 PM One of the biggest story lines not being talked about, already down our S, and we lose our CB1 . Essentially went from an advantage to Elam, who was a liability 3 1 7 3 1 Quote
davefan66 Posted Monday at 01:32 PM Posted Monday at 01:32 PM Elam better be outright released ASAP. He will never be a quality NFL corner…ever. Looked bewildered out there. Couple him with Damar on the field?? What did anyone expect. Rapp and Benford need to stay. Douglas didn’t look great but still believe he can be good. Damar can hit the bricks also…done with him. Need a new starting safety and better backups. Problem is you need a quality pass rush to give the dbacks a chance. Don’t get that from our line. 3 3 1 2 Quote
BuffaloRebound Posted Monday at 01:35 PM Posted Monday at 01:35 PM Please. Defenses always suffer some injuries especially soft undersized ones. It’s a garbage scheme when it depends on every single player being healthy or we completely crumble in big games. 5 2 2 Quote
oldmanfan Posted Monday at 01:38 PM Posted Monday at 01:38 PM (edited) It hurt. I thought Bishop played OK as did Hamlin. Kelce wasn't really a factor. I am surprised they didn't put Ingram in for Elam. Edited Monday at 01:39 PM by oldmanfan 2 4 Quote
NoSaint Posted Monday at 01:39 PM Posted Monday at 01:39 PM 12 minutes ago, JerseyBills said: One of the biggest story lines not being talked about, already down our S, and we lose our CB1 . Essentially went from an advantage to Elam, who was a liability should’ve swapped coverages sooner still we were fine enough once we did Quote
K D Posted Monday at 01:40 PM Posted Monday at 01:40 PM Elam is the worst draft pick I've ever seen. If he wasn't picked in round 1 he would have never made the team at any point. We have drafted and released late round and undrafted guys that are better. How can you miss THAT badly? 4 1 Quote
WNYFAN1 Posted Monday at 01:41 PM Posted Monday at 01:41 PM I sure hope they didn't "rush" him through the concussion protocol. Not saying they did, but boy that was was a BAD look. Hope he's ok 3 1 Quote
bmur66 Posted Monday at 01:41 PM Posted Monday at 01:41 PM (edited) Should have told Elam to just go get the ball. Edited Monday at 01:41 PM by bmur66 Quote
Buffalo_Stampede Posted Monday at 01:42 PM Posted Monday at 01:42 PM Elam was neutered by the coaching staff. Horrible development of the kid. 1 2 Quote
notpolian Posted Monday at 01:43 PM Posted Monday at 01:43 PM I was wondering if they would try Ingram yesterday at some point. I'm glad Benford has several months off. He didn't look good. Quote
dma0034 Posted Monday at 01:44 PM Posted Monday at 01:44 PM Injuries happen. In a week where Benford didn't practice much to have Elam not remotely ready is on coaching 1 Quote
T.E. Posted Monday at 01:46 PM Posted Monday at 01:46 PM We could've had an in-his-prime Deion Sanders replace him, and our coaching staff would've still put him in a position to not make any plays on the ball. 2 Quote
stlbills13 Posted Monday at 01:47 PM Posted Monday at 01:47 PM Elam was awful Bishop other than one or two plays was actually pretty solid I thought Hamlin was awful 1 2 Quote
Back2Buff Posted Monday at 01:48 PM Posted Monday at 01:48 PM I dont understand how Elam goes from consistently inactive to the 3rd CB. 1 1 Quote
St. Kitts Bills Cru Posted Monday at 01:48 PM Posted Monday at 01:48 PM 4 minutes ago, notpolian said: I was wondering if they would try Ingram yesterday at some point. I'm glad Benford has several months off. He didn't look good. He couldn't have played any worse than Elam did. 1 Quote
MasterStrategist Posted Monday at 01:50 PM Posted Monday at 01:50 PM 6 minutes ago, Buffalo_Stampede said: Elam was neutered by the coaching staff. Horrible development of the kid. For a coaching staff that has developed far less "pure talent", coaching isn't the problem. Elam has a slew of others problems, but on the field primarily it's his "handyiness". If anything, he needed those neutered. Quote
davefan66 Posted Monday at 01:51 PM Posted Monday at 01:51 PM 11 minutes ago, oldmanfan said: It hurt. I thought Bishop played OK as did Hamlin. Kelce wasn't really a factor. I am surprised they didn't put Ingram in for Elam. My son was screaming at the TV to put Ingram in every time Elam was on the end of a bad play. How much worse could he possibly have been?? Thought he’s played pretty well. Quote
Buffalo_Stampede Posted Monday at 01:52 PM Posted Monday at 01:52 PM Just now, MasterStrategist said: For a coaching staff that has developed far less "pure talent", coaching isn't the problem. Elam has a slew of others problems, but on the field primarily it's his "handyiness". If anything, he needed those neutered. From day one they said he was too physical with WRs. They neutered him. Now he’s bailing on everything. Quote
notpolian Posted Monday at 01:52 PM Posted Monday at 01:52 PM 3 minutes ago, T.E. said: We could've had an in-his-prime Deion Sanders replace him, and our coaching staff would've still put him in a position to not make any plays on the ball. I get your frustration. But we played a lot of man to man yesterday. Which is what we needed to do against KC. Problem is we don't have the players with sufficient talent to play man to man. Ol Prime was quite the man coverage dude. I was amused when I heard him say recently "Prime don't play no zone". Quote
JerseyBills Posted Monday at 01:53 PM Author Posted Monday at 01:53 PM 14 minutes ago, oldmanfan said: It hurt. I thought Bishop played OK as did Hamlin. Kelce wasn't really a factor. I am surprised they didn't put Ingram in for Elam. Ya I forgot about Ingram. Elam was getting smoked out there, unbelievable, what a bum. 1 Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.