Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
1 hour ago, RkFast said:

 

Totally fair. The NFL has a serious problem on their hands. But judging by Goodell's comments he doesn't care. 

If I remember correctly when the officials screwed the Saints the league admitted it was unacceptable and vowed to improve, but this time they are indicating that the problem is acceptable and they will continue this way. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
19 minutes ago, Orlando Buffalo said:

If I remember correctly when the officials screwed the Saints the league admitted it was unacceptable and vowed to improve, but this time they are indicating that the problem is acceptable and they will continue this way. 

 

When they vowed to improve, it was a flat-out lie. They wanted L.A. in the SB. The NFL has an obscene infatuation with the L.A. market. It's now clear to me that they're continuing to hand-pick teams. 

Posted
52 minutes ago, Orlando Buffalo said:

If I remember correctly when the officials screwed the Saints the league admitted it was unacceptable and vowed to improve, but this time they are indicating that the problem is acceptable and they will continue this way. 

 

Well, its backfiring BIG TIME. Been listening to a lot of Mad Dog Sports on Sirius, with all the interviews and what not and this is a MAJOR talking point. 

Posted
9 hours ago, Fleezoid said:

 

When they vowed to improve, it was a flat-out lie. They wanted L.A. in the SB. The NFL has an obscene infatuation with the L.A. market. It's now clear to me that they're continuing to hand-pick teams. 

Do you think if Lions didn't get bounced and made it... The calls in Chiefs game would have favored Bills?

 

MAYBE... Both championship games should be played at the same to kind put the brakes on these selected match ups?

 

 

 

Posted
8 hours ago, That's No Moon said:

It's not like a protest or something, I won't watch because I don't care.

 

Kind of where I am at right now.   I had absolute football fatigue after the championship game.   If the Chiefs win Mahomes or Brady will have been the winning QB in 7 of the last 10 Superbowls.   In the last 20 Superbowls ten teams have been present 31 of 40 times.   KC, Philadelphia, Pittsburgh, Seattle, LA, San Fran, New England, Denver, Indianapolis and the NYG have been present in 80% of the Super Bowls since 2005.   For a league that prides itself on parity, there really aren't any Cinderella stories in the NFL anymore. 

 

Posted

FYI, if you have a Roku, under Live Channels is ESPN 8, The Ocho.  On Sunday evening, starting at 6pm, you can watch the Wisconsin Auctioneers Championship, then Jelle’s Marble Runs, followed by USA Mullet Championships and finish with the USA Climbing National Championship.  

Posted

my heart wanted to boycott. I decided to succumb to family desire to  (as usual) make it a festive fun annual holiday type affair

 

which we did

 

and It was better than I could have imagined.

 

except the halftime shows ending was it's highlight for me lol geez

 

I did not drink. No stress . I was feeling bitter at the beginning "It should be us those rat *******s" but after the play commenced it was pure beauty.

 

I enjoyed it. Glad I watched.

 

POBRECITO chiiefs fans. they must feel like **** today. ha Ha HA

Posted

If it were not for the boxes, I wouldn't have cared much at all about the game. If the Chiefs went for one instead of two on their last TD, I would have made a large amount of money.

The boxes make the Super Bowl fun imo. Not the trite commercials nor the horrid halftime shows. 

Posted

What, EXACTLY, do the ratings measure? Is it just from kick off to the final whistle? How much of the advance garbage counts. 

 

I think more people than ever are waiting until kickoff. Five hours of hype is garbage with all the access we have to so much else that is available. 

Posted
8 hours ago, PromoTheRobot said:

 

2 hours ago, Jrb1979 said:

So much for the boycott. They set a new record with 137 million tuning in to the Super Bowl. 

 

https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/tv/tv-news/super-bowl-lix-tv-ratings-record-feb-9-2025-1236132107/

 

I'm confused. How did it set a record if there was a 5% drop in viewership?

Posted
10 hours ago, Dr Krentist said:

 

 

I'm confused. How did it set a record if there was a 5% drop in viewership?

 

Because TV Ratings are lies.  Seriously, major companies pay off Nielsen to be able to charge more for Ad revenue.  You will never see the NFL lose viewership in a SB.  They pay too much to have that headline.

  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted
13 hours ago, Jrb1979 said:

So much for the boycott. They set a new record with 137 million tuning in to the Super Bowl. 

The boycott bunch reminds me of the neighbor who complains about another neighbor but you always see them talking to them.

  • Haha (+1) 1
  • Awesome! (+1) 1

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...