Sojourner Posted 18 hours ago Posted 18 hours ago 3 hours ago, hondo in seattle said: If he wants to end his career on a cheap contract in Buffalo because he's a Bills fan, then I'm all for it. He had 6 sacks last year. The only Bill with more was Groot. Could be good in rotation. Yeah, agree. He was in a rotational role last year. 60% of the snaps so he’d fit right in. Better part is only the season before he was insanely productive for his age; 17 sacks, 74 tackles & 21 TFL’s with 5 FF. 1 Quote
Thrivefourfive Posted 18 hours ago Posted 18 hours ago Yes, pass. We don’t do this. Adds nothing to something. Quote
Buffalo Junction Posted 18 hours ago Posted 18 hours ago If he wants to ring chase here and take a substantial discount…. Sure. I don’t see it happening any other way. I’m sure Mack would be embraced by us fans if he signed for $12MM and incentives. Quote
SectionC3 Posted 18 hours ago Posted 18 hours ago 8 hours ago, Aussie Joe said: Pay someone younger Pay the guys that have been here. 2 Quote
nedboy7 Posted 18 hours ago Posted 18 hours ago I doubt Bean will make this decision with what’s gone on last 2 years with Von. Which is smart. 1 Quote
uticaclub Posted 18 hours ago Posted 18 hours ago Good replacement for Von and/or AJE next year 1 Quote
Aussie Joe Posted 18 hours ago Posted 18 hours ago 7 minutes ago, SectionC3 said: Pay the guys that have been here. Continue to do that as well Quote
Buffalo Ballin Posted 18 hours ago Posted 18 hours ago Nah we good, fam. Good luck to Khalil Mack where ever he goes. Quote
Aussie Joe Posted 18 hours ago Posted 18 hours ago 6 minutes ago, uticaclub said: Good replacement for Von and/or AJE next year AJE had his best game of the year against the Ravens 1 Quote
uticaclub Posted 16 hours ago Posted 16 hours ago 1 hour ago, Aussie Joe said: AJE had his best game of the year against the Ravens Enough to give him an extension? Quote
Aussie Joe Posted 15 hours ago Posted 15 hours ago 41 minutes ago, uticaclub said: Enough to give him an extension? No …but he is still contracted here next year so he doesn’t require one … I expect him back next season … Quote
HurlyBurly51 Posted 15 hours ago Posted 15 hours ago 6 hours ago, BillsFanForever19 said: And we need to free Cap Space. Do we? I thought that's what the purge last offseason was all about? I mean we could always use more space, and want to use it efficiently, but I thought we were heading into the new league year in a relatively healthy cap situation. (and that's with the understanding and agreement that Von is gone). Quote
uticaclub Posted 15 hours ago Posted 15 hours ago 34 minutes ago, Aussie Joe said: No …but he is still contracted here next year so he doesn’t require one … I expect him back next season … I thought the 2nd year was a void year and we save like $4M if we cut him Quote
BillsFanForever19 Posted 15 hours ago Posted 15 hours ago (edited) 22 minutes ago, HurlyBurly51 said: Do we? I thought that's what the purge last offseason was all about? I mean we could always use more space, and want to use it efficiently, but I thought we were heading into the new league year in a relatively healthy cap situation. (and that's with the understanding and agreement that Von is gone). The purge was because we were 54 million over the cap before it. According to Spotrac, we're 1.5 million over the cap right now. And that includes factoring in a Salary Cap bump to 277 million. Edited 15 hours ago by BillsFanForever19 Quote
Aussie Joe Posted 15 hours ago Posted 15 hours ago (edited) 26 minutes ago, uticaclub said: I thought the 2nd year was a void year and we save like $4M if we cut him He signed for two years … I think he is on a reasonable deal for his level of play …although I hoped he would have been better this year…. Im leaning towards not bringing back in 2026 though …. Edited 14 hours ago by Aussie Joe Quote
HurlyBurly51 Posted 13 hours ago Posted 13 hours ago 1 hour ago, BillsFanForever19 said: The purge was because we were 54 million over the cap before it. According to Spotrac, we're 1.5 million over the cap right now. And that includes factoring in a Salary Cap bump to 277 million. Bummer. I thought the late purge of Stef was made with an eye to eat it now, and the space that would've been used up next year was instead going to be freed up. Not to mention the sure to come Allen deal. Oh well, I'm certainly no capologist. I'm sure Beane will figure it out. Quote
Utah John Posted 12 hours ago Posted 12 hours ago We do need a difference maker at LB. And we have him! Milano is back! Quote
davefan66 Posted 11 hours ago Posted 11 hours ago 3 hours ago, HurlyBurly51 said: Do we? I thought that's what the purge last offseason was all about? I mean we could always use more space, and want to use it efficiently, but I thought we were heading into the new league year in a relatively healthy cap situation. (and that's with the understanding and agreement that Von is gone). We got out of cap hell with the purge to get to a place we could function daily. Last year (or two) Beane has had an issue with end of season moves because of restricted cap. Biggest problem? Upcoming free agents. Per Sportrac next season should be decent on FA’s - Rasul, Ty Johnson, Alex Anderson. Also Smoot and Hollins (both shouldn’t break the bank). Few others that would be year to year or find someone else. 2026 is going to be a tough year as Epenesa, Rousseau, Cook, Bernard, Shakir, Benford are all due. Epenesa could be gone. Rousseau will be big bucks. Bernard will be huge money. Shakir and Benford will most likely be big bucks also. Cook may be expendable if we keep Ty with Davis and Gore getting more carries. 2026 isn’t doom and gloom. Cap purge was a way to deal with it. Cap will go up next few years, and Beane can structure 2026 contracts to kick the can so to speak. Another Problem? Josh’s contract will most likely need to be dealt with for cap relief and larger numbers. Although not sure how you do both? That being said, Beane will be judicious about giving contracts to league free agents. Khalil Mack is a good player but will he want to give him a large contract at the expense of keeping his own? Especially a guy at the end of his career with the possibility of production drop off? Personally, I don’t think he would. Quote
QCity Posted 7 hours ago Posted 7 hours ago Sammy Watkins is available next year. Probably the year after that too unless we lock him up long term. Quote
scuba guy Posted 6 hours ago Posted 6 hours ago 12 hours ago, Solomon Grundy said: Wouldn't Von's money become available? I looked if Vin retired yes. But still some gets rolled over but not as much. Has to due with the original contract terms Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.