4th&long Posted January 23 Posted January 23 January 6 is a stain on trumps legacy and letting the terrorists out only adds to it. Nothing Maga can do about it. Live with it.
JDHillFan Posted January 23 Posted January 23 1 hour ago, 4th&long said: January 6 is a stain on trumps legacy and letting the terrorists out only adds to it. Nothing Maga can do about it. Live with it. A stain so horrific that Americans are giving him another crack at the most important job in the world. Zany! 1
BillsFanNC Posted January 23 Author Posted January 23 It's a stain on Trump's legacy! - 4th&schlong Meanwhile, here under a blue sky, justice is coming for the police state actors who weaponized the justice system to persecute fellow Americans. Read every word below. Then realize that this is a J6 case selected at random. There are hundreds more at least as bad or worse. Justice. Is. Coming. I picked a J6 case at random to review because I wanted to see how bad it was. And let me tell you the random one I picked did not disappoint. This defendant went into the capital and walked down the corridor. He was not accused of violence. He did not break anything. He did not hurt anybody. He was sentenced by a jury to 19 months in prison he was overcharged by the prosecutor to the point where it should be called malicious prosecution, and a judge rubber stamped every single thing the prosecutor asked for. The most egregious part of these filings was that the government introduced a 22 minute video montage that spliced together key breaches that occurred that day. They introduced that video to a jury even when the defendant in question is only shown on that video for less than 60 seconds. The defendant in question was not violent. He was walking through a hallway in the capital building with the crowd, he looked like it was a walking tour in the picture still shot. The remaining 21 minutes, shows the most violent portions of the event spliced together. Luckily, this defendant seems to have had competent attorneys who filed a motion to exclude this video. The defendant’s lawyers argued that this video montage is highly prejudicial because it shows a jury a 22 minute video where all they see are the most extreme parts of the whole day, but the defendant in question is only on that videotape for six seconds and is seen walking around peacefully. Further, attorneys for the defendant argued that the majority of the jury in Washington DC is made of a federal employees. This video is meant to inflame a jury, it has no probative value, and therefore is a violation of federal rule of evidence 401 (which by the way they teach like on the first day of criminal procedure in law school). District Court Judge Bates declined the motion and allowed the prosecutor to include the video montage. I would be willing to bet everything I own that submitting a 22 minute video montage that shows the most egregious acts of violence you can find from that day when the defendant in question is on that video for only six seconds and is seen walking calmly is highly prejudicial and a violation of the defendants due process rights. This person was found guilty and sentenced to 19 months in prison. Let me repeat that again, this person got 19 months in prison for walking through the capital for 8 minuets. It took me two hours to read through all of the documents that were in this case file. Every motion submitted by the defendant was denied, and every motion submitted by the government was granted. They turned a trespass misdemeanor that would have result in a $50 ticket into a 5 misdemeanors and a felony charge by charging the defendant with a statute that would have required the Secret Service to rope off the section he was in, which they did not, they also charged him with a statute that would have required them to prove Mike Pence was in the building at the time he walked through that corridor, he was not, and finally they used an Enron statue that the Supreme Court struck down. This defendant had to spend two years and probably hundreds of thousands of dollars in attorneys fees for spending 20 minutes in the building and walking through the corridors. And this is just the first case I dug into. Imagine if we had the time to dig into the details of each and every single one of these cases, read all the filings and compile a report on the amount of due process violations that were committed. You know it’s called journalism. Something that only Julie Kelly and a small few others seem to understand how to do as it relates to J6. People need to see the inside of jail cells. This is so far beyond prosecutorial discretion. This is straight up political persecution. But the biggest problem here are the judges that rubber stamped all of it.
4th&long Posted January 23 Posted January 23 40 minutes ago, JDHillFan said: A stain so horrific that Americans are giving him another crack at the most important job in the world. Zany! The crack at the job wasn't to pardon terrorists. Zany! 29 minutes ago, BillsFanNC said: It's a stain on Trump's legacy! - 4th&schlong Meanwhile, here under a blue sky, justice is coming for the police state actors who weaponized the justice system to persecute fellow Americans. Read every word below. Then realize that this is a J6 case selected at random. There are hundreds more at least as bad or worse. Justice. Is. Coming. I picked a J6 case at random to review because I wanted to see how bad it was. And let me tell you the random one I picked did not disappoint. This defendant went into the capital and walked down the corridor. He was not accused of violence. He did not break anything. He did not hurt anybody. He was sentenced by a jury to 19 months in prison he was overcharged by the prosecutor to the point where it should be called malicious prosecution, and a judge rubber stamped every single thing the prosecutor asked for. The most egregious part of these filings was that the government introduced a 22 minute video montage that spliced together key breaches that occurred that day. They introduced that video to a jury even when the defendant in question is only shown on that video for less than 60 seconds. The defendant in question was not violent. He was walking through a hallway in the capital building with the crowd, he looked like it was a walking tour in the picture still shot. The remaining 21 minutes, shows the most violent portions of the event spliced together. Luckily, this defendant seems to have had competent attorneys who filed a motion to exclude this video. The defendant’s lawyers argued that this video montage is highly prejudicial because it shows a jury a 22 minute video where all they see are the most extreme parts of the whole day, but the defendant in question is only on that videotape for six seconds and is seen walking around peacefully. Further, attorneys for the defendant argued that the majority of the jury in Washington DC is made of a federal employees. This video is meant to inflame a jury, it has no probative value, and therefore is a violation of federal rule of evidence 401 (which by the way they teach like on the first day of criminal procedure in law school). District Court Judge Bates declined the motion and allowed the prosecutor to include the video montage. I would be willing to bet everything I own that submitting a 22 minute video montage that shows the most egregious acts of violence you can find from that day when the defendant in question is on that video for only six seconds and is seen walking calmly is highly prejudicial and a violation of the defendants due process rights. This person was found guilty and sentenced to 19 months in prison. Let me repeat that again, this person got 19 months in prison for walking through the capital for 8 minuets. It took me two hours to read through all of the documents that were in this case file. Every motion submitted by the defendant was denied, and every motion submitted by the government was granted. They turned a trespass misdemeanor that would have result in a $50 ticket into a 5 misdemeanors and a felony charge by charging the defendant with a statute that would have required the Secret Service to rope off the section he was in, which they did not, they also charged him with a statute that would have required them to prove Mike Pence was in the building at the time he walked through that corridor, he was not, and finally they used an Enron statue that the Supreme Court struck down. This defendant had to spend two years and probably hundreds of thousands of dollars in attorneys fees for spending 20 minutes in the building and walking through the corridors. And this is just the first case I dug into. Imagine if we had the time to dig into the details of each and every single one of these cases, read all the filings and compile a report on the amount of due process violations that were committed. You know it’s called journalism. Something that only Julie Kelly and a small few others seem to understand how to do as it relates to J6. People need to see the inside of jail cells. This is so far beyond prosecutorial discretion. This is straight up political persecution. But the biggest problem here are the judges that rubber stamped all of it. Novice is reading your drivel. Don't waste your time.
LeviF Posted January 23 Posted January 23 Leftists just got done mourning the death of Jimmy Carter and how great he was and now want to whinge about Trump pardoning "terrorists." lol lmao 1
Trump_is_Mentally_fit Posted January 25 Posted January 25 Bravo! Only the best! 👏 Dirty people rejoice everywhere! Dykes, of Bluffton, South Carolina, was sentenced to 57 months in federal prison for stealing a police riot shield and twice using it against officers. He pleaded guilty to two felony counts of assaulting, resisting or impeding officers. Prosecutors accused Dykes of giving a “Sieg Heil!” (Hail to victory!) salute during the attack, which he denied. Prosecutors also said that Dykes quoted Adolf Hitler before the attack and that he had participated in a training for a neo-Nazi accelerationist group, The Base. Recommended When Dykes, who was discharged from the Marines for “participating in extremist behavior,” was taken into federal custody, he was serving a five-year sentence for his actions in the racist “Unite the Right” rally in Charlottesville, Virginia, in 2017.
daz28 Posted January 26 Posted January 26 10 hours ago, BillsFanNC said: If this guy was laughing and taking pictures, this is a GREAT story. If this guy was inciting violence, then this sucks. If you just kowtow to the GQP those two distinctions don't matter.
leh-nerd skin-erd Posted January 27 Posted January 27 (edited) On 1/22/2025 at 12:41 PM, 4th&long said: I'm glad you so butt hurt about my phone auto correct changing it to 15. Tells me all I need to know about you. And what you said about them being on you like white on rice wad the impression I got from the Doc, not the news. Like I said before, the guy said he had authorization to shoot, he didn't say he would automatically. I don't care about the news. But do me a favor and test your theory about it you will get shot. I want to know before I go there. Your auto-correct only goes to 15? Does your phone say “Fisher Price” on it anywhere? Be honest, please, I’m doing research. It’s for a project. Edited January 27 by leh-nerd skin-erd 2
4th&long Posted January 27 Posted January 27 5 hours ago, leh-nerd skin-erd said: Your auto-correct only goes to 15? Does your phone say “Fisher Price” on it anywhere? Be honest, please, I’m doing research. It’s for a project. I'm surprised you could spell research?
leh-nerd skin-erd Posted January 27 Posted January 27 2 minutes ago, 4th&long said: I'm surprised you could spell research? I didn’t even need auto-correct to screw it up!
4th&long Posted January 27 Posted January 27 1 minute ago, leh-nerd skin-erd said: I didn’t even need auto-correct to screw it up! But you did need Google to spell it.
JDHillFan Posted January 27 Posted January 27 5 hours ago, leh-nerd skin-erd said: Your auto-correct only goes to 15? Does your phone say “Fisher Price” on it anywhere? Be honest, please, I’m doing research. It’s for a project. mystery solved
leh-nerd skin-erd Posted January 27 Posted January 27 9 minutes ago, 4th&long said: But you did need Google to spell it. I can see why you would think that but it’s not as complicated as “51”. I’d say it was the exacting standards at Catholic School that brought me to the heights of spelling greatness. 6 minutes ago, JDHillFan said: mystery solved Ah, this explains it. I’m surprised the news people didn’t mix the two areas up. It’s pretty common I hear.
Recommended Posts