RiotAct Posted 5 hours ago Posted 5 hours ago 13 minutes ago, Straight Hucklebuck said: Last week we never got word Saturday that Davis cleared protocol, we just saw the practice squad elevations at 4:00 PM and saw no Frank Gore Jr and assumed he was clear. With Benford I don’t see a practice squad elevation because they’ll just have Elam active. 1 Quote
Pete Posted 5 hours ago Posted 5 hours ago 16 minutes ago, Special K said: Don't forget Ty Johnson......all he does is make big plays when he's in there! The best third down rb in the nfl 1 1 1 Quote
mbowman14 Posted 5 hours ago Posted 5 hours ago 2 minutes ago, Scott7975 said: I still think Benford will play. He will do the walkthrough practice Saturday. Sunday he will get checked and cleared by an independent. I agree with a fair amount of man-to-man and being aggressive vs sitting all game in a passive zone getting picked apart. The Baltimore success rate by coverage splits certainly backs that up as well. I hope if that is the plan, Douglas does not find his way on Worthy. Keep him on Juju or Hopkins. Worthy's speed vs Douglas will be no bueno in man-to-man and a big play waiting to happen. 2 Quote
Special K Posted 5 hours ago Posted 5 hours ago 1 minute ago, Gman10 said: Is Milano in for Sunday? All signs point to yes 1 Quote
RiotAct Posted 5 hours ago Posted 5 hours ago 1 minute ago, Gman10 said: Is Milano in for Sunday? should be… full go at practice. 1 Quote
3rdand12 Posted 5 hours ago Posted 5 hours ago 7 minutes ago, Scott7975 said: I still think Benford will play. He will do the walkthrough practice Saturday. Sunday he will get checked and cleared by an independent. Gosh I sure hope so. Elam plays man coverage , or so I heard.. ( ducks for cover ) if Benford isn't clear headed 3 minutes ago, Pete said: The best third down rb in the nfl How fun is it for SOME of us here , that we use a 3 running backs each game ! And Gilliam ! I love this stuff. If only they still played on grass and dusty dirt. Key to the game btw 2 Quote
Success Posted 5 hours ago Posted 5 hours ago Even if Benford can't play, it's not like we'd have a JAG coming in for either him or Rapp, or a situation like last year w/ Klein. We have high-round draft picks at each position who bring different strengths to the table & will hold it down fine. Elam has a nose for the ball - he might end up getting a game-changing pick if he's called upon. Bishop is fast & athletic and has gotten good experience in the regular and last week. Still, I feel confident Benford will be out there on Sunday. 1 Quote
Straight Hucklebuck Posted 5 hours ago Posted 5 hours ago Milano - "We'll see how (he) continues to trend towards game time" - "kind of like you'd expect sore there, dealing with it, still dealing with it, doing more today to test it out" ... "we'll see how it goes, kind of one of those things that's up in the air" Geez man, if he doesn't play. Quote
3rdand12 Posted 5 hours ago Posted 5 hours ago 4 minutes ago, mbowman14 said: I agree with a fair amount of man-to-man and being aggressive vs sitting all game in a passive zone getting picked apart. The Baltimore success rate by coverage splits certainly backs that up as well. I hope if that is the plan, Douglas does not find his way on Worthy. Keep him on Juju or Hopkins. Worthy's speed vs Douglas will be no bueno in man-to-man and a big play waiting to happen. so whom do you assign in man ? Just chuck him off the line btw and its over I hope Bills mix it up again as well as last weekend 4-3 , heavy nickel and standard , and dime personnel . Quote
Straight Hucklebuck Posted 4 hours ago Posted 4 hours ago 1 minute ago, Logic said: Yeah because they can hide him down in the box and not have him play in space deep - because he gets lost and gets cooked. Quote
Logic Posted 4 hours ago Posted 4 hours ago Just now, Straight Hucklebuck said: Yeah because they can hide him down in the box and not have him play in space deep - because he gets lost and gets cooked. To be fair, I watched Rapp get cooked deep for six on the very first drive against the Broncos. I don't think deep coverage is the strength of ANY of our safeties, Rapp included. 1 1 Quote
NickelCity Posted 4 hours ago Posted 4 hours ago We need to be able to run the ball on this game. Josh bailed us out last time against the chiefs converting a ton of 3rd and longs. Oh the other side it's all about getting to Mahomes quickly. 2 Quote
3rdand12 Posted 4 hours ago Posted 4 hours ago 2 minutes ago, Logic said: To be fair, I watched Rapp get cooked deep for six on the very first drive against the Broncos. I don't think deep coverage is the strength of ANY of our safeties, Rapp included. Rapp is a downhill player by nature. Saw that play and had my first freak out about the game 🙃 That was a miscommunication on the back end , I read somewhere. But yes , they aren't catching anyone from behind thats for sure ! 2 minutes ago, NickelCity said: We need to be able to run the ball on this game. Josh bailed us out last time against the chiefs converting a ton of 3rd and longs. Oh the other side it's all about getting to Mahomes quickly. Pressure and contain him. Make him work Quote
KingBoots8 Posted 4 hours ago Posted 4 hours ago Chiefs have put Josh on their tackle dummies. Looks like Josh tackled back in this picture lol 8 Quote
Dan Posted 4 hours ago Posted 4 hours ago 1 hour ago, HappyDays said: This is from Joe Buscaglia's review of the Ravens game:. More man coverage this week, please. Elite QBs tear up our zone defense annually in the playoffs. KC's receivers are pretty average overall. Don't be afraid to man them up and don't be afraid to blitz Mahomes. The book on stopping their offense has changed. 27 minutes ago, Scott7975 said: I still think Benford will play. He will do the walkthrough practice Saturday. Sunday he will get checked and cleared by an independent. I know that won’t.. and shouldn’t play all man. But they absolutely have to play more man coverage than in the past playoff losses and time the coverages better! Patty will eat the zone up! This may very well decide the game.. how much man vs zone they play. 1 1 1 Quote
Forward Progress Posted 4 hours ago Posted 4 hours ago 1 hour ago, Charles Romes said: Might be a blessing in disguise to get Bishop’s 4.4 speed out there. 1 hour ago, Straight Hucklebuck said: It's definitely not a blessing. His speed as not been an asset all year. Bishop's speed is only a blessing if he knows where to go with it. I hope he's been an A+ student of the game since he last took meaningful snaps. 1 Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.