Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
Just now, The Frankish Reich said:

Maybe nobody really has a handle on that "define woman" thing.

Everyone has a handle on it and always has. For some reason “progressives” have, in very recent times, decided to confuse the issue and agonize over definitions. How old were you when you started to struggle with the concept?

  • Agree 2
  • Awesome! (+1) 1
Posted (edited)
2 minutes ago, Biden is Mentally Fit said:

Everyone has a handle on it and always has. For some reason “progressives” have, in very recent times, decided to confuse the issue and agonize over definitions. How old were you when you started to struggle with the concept?

Could you then explain to me who the phrasing of this EO will clarify things?

I just gave you a few ways they could've done it, but they chose a totally circular definition. It simply won't advance their agenda because it is so poorly drafted. The only thing they've accomplished is to change the conversation from "define woman" to "define female."

Edited by The Frankish Reich
  • Haha (+1) 3
Posted
3 minutes ago, BillsFanNC said:

 ⬆️ 

 

Qanon!

 

***** moron.

 

Cope and seethe!

 

:lol:

I thought I was blocked? Your mother told me to say hi to you. 

Posted
10 minutes ago, The Frankish Reich said:

Could you then explain to me who the phrasing of this EO will clarify things?

I just gave you a few ways they could've done it, but they chose a totally circular definition. It simply won't advance their agenda because it is so poorly drafted. The only thing they've accomplished is to change the conversation from "define woman" to "define female."

Nobody cares about the wording with the exception of you and Roundy. Everyone knows man from woman even though there’s been a lot of pretending otherwise. Move on from the gender idiocy already. 

  • Agree 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted
2 hours ago, The Frankish Reich said:

Well there's an epic fail. Circular argument.

Other side: Yes. And a "female" is a person whose gender identification is as a woman."

 

I don't know why he didn't go with a chromosomal thing, or "has/doesn't have a penis," or at least "is a person registered by authorities as of the female sex at birth, such designation not having been officially changed by a registrar of vital records in the jurisdiction of that person's residence"

 

Maybe nobody really has a handle on that "define woman" thing.

Or maybe I need to volunteer to help these Trumpies with that whole law thing.

And you can only be a woman if you were born as female…👍

Posted
12 minutes ago, Roundybout said:


Honest question, why do you guys love Andrew Jackson so much? 

It’s just a symbolic part of undoing the disaster that was the Biden presidency. Surely you can understand that. Or will the Jackson portrait be today’s “flag code” outrage?
 

Posted
12 minutes ago, Biden is Mentally Fit said:

It’s just a symbolic part of undoing the disaster that was the Biden presidency. Surely you can understand that. Or will the Jackson portrait be today’s “flag code” outrage?
 


I am not following. Why Andrew Jackson? What is the connection here?

×
×
  • Create New...