JDHillFan Posted Monday at 11:51 PM Posted Monday at 11:51 PM Just now, The Frankish Reich said: Maybe nobody really has a handle on that "define woman" thing. Everyone has a handle on it and always has. For some reason “progressives” have, in very recent times, decided to confuse the issue and agonize over definitions. How old were you when you started to struggle with the concept? 2 1
The Frankish Reich Posted Monday at 11:53 PM Posted Monday at 11:53 PM (edited) 2 minutes ago, Biden is Mentally Fit said: Everyone has a handle on it and always has. For some reason “progressives” have, in very recent times, decided to confuse the issue and agonize over definitions. How old were you when you started to struggle with the concept? Could you then explain to me who the phrasing of this EO will clarify things? I just gave you a few ways they could've done it, but they chose a totally circular definition. It simply won't advance their agenda because it is so poorly drafted. The only thing they've accomplished is to change the conversation from "define woman" to "define female." Edited Monday at 11:53 PM by The Frankish Reich 3
BillsFanNC Posted Monday at 11:57 PM Author Posted Monday at 11:57 PM ⬆️ Qanon! ***** moron. Cope and seethe!
4th&long Posted yesterday at 12:00 AM Posted yesterday at 12:00 AM 3 minutes ago, BillsFanNC said: ⬆️ Qanon! ***** moron. Cope and seethe! I thought I was blocked? Your mother told me to say hi to you.
JDHillFan Posted yesterday at 12:05 AM Posted yesterday at 12:05 AM 10 minutes ago, The Frankish Reich said: Could you then explain to me who the phrasing of this EO will clarify things? I just gave you a few ways they could've done it, but they chose a totally circular definition. It simply won't advance their agenda because it is so poorly drafted. The only thing they've accomplished is to change the conversation from "define woman" to "define female." Nobody cares about the wording with the exception of you and Roundy. Everyone knows man from woman even though there’s been a lot of pretending otherwise. Move on from the gender idiocy already. 1 1
BillsFanNC Posted yesterday at 12:18 AM Author Posted yesterday at 12:18 AM Clarity for Finding. You ***** morons have learned ZERO. Because you're useful idiots and are incapable... 1
4th&long Posted 22 hours ago Posted 22 hours ago So still nothing useful? That's what I thought. The clown show is under way!
JDHillFan Posted 22 hours ago Posted 22 hours ago 2 minutes ago, 4th&long said: So still nothing useful? That's what I thought. The clown show is under way! What would qualify as useful for you? It’s not a trick question.
Coffeesforclosers Posted 22 hours ago Posted 22 hours ago 1 hour ago, B-Man said: So what if teleworking is protected by the worker's contracts and those contracts are in effect?
JaCrispy Posted 22 hours ago Posted 22 hours ago 2 hours ago, The Frankish Reich said: Well there's an epic fail. Circular argument. Other side: Yes. And a "female" is a person whose gender identification is as a woman." I don't know why he didn't go with a chromosomal thing, or "has/doesn't have a penis," or at least "is a person registered by authorities as of the female sex at birth, such designation not having been officially changed by a registrar of vital records in the jurisdiction of that person's residence" Maybe nobody really has a handle on that "define woman" thing. Or maybe I need to volunteer to help these Trumpies with that whole law thing. And you can only be a woman if you were born as female…👍
JaCrispy Posted 21 hours ago Posted 21 hours ago 31 minutes ago, 4th&long said: So still nothing useful? That's what I thought. The clown show is under way! 1
Roundybout Posted 12 hours ago Posted 12 hours ago 6 hours ago, B-Man said: Honest question, why do you guys love Andrew Jackson so much?
JDHillFan Posted 12 hours ago Posted 12 hours ago 12 minutes ago, Roundybout said: Honest question, why do you guys love Andrew Jackson so much? It’s just a symbolic part of undoing the disaster that was the Biden presidency. Surely you can understand that. Or will the Jackson portrait be today’s “flag code” outrage?
Roundybout Posted 12 hours ago Posted 12 hours ago 12 minutes ago, Biden is Mentally Fit said: It’s just a symbolic part of undoing the disaster that was the Biden presidency. Surely you can understand that. Or will the Jackson portrait be today’s “flag code” outrage? I am not following. Why Andrew Jackson? What is the connection here?
Recommended Posts